Ludusanu Andreea, Ciuntu Bogdan M, Tanevski Adelina, Fotache Marin, Radu Viorel D, Burlacu Alexandru, Tinica Grigore
Anatomy, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iași, ROU.
General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iași, ROU.
Cureus. 2024 Oct 23;16(10):e72210. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72210. eCollection 2024 Oct.
Background Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a common surgical intervention used to treat severe coronary artery disease. The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score has become a widely used prognostic index for assessing the severity of liver disease and prioritizing liver transplantation. However, its utility in predicting outcomes in cardiac surgery procedures has not been extensively evaluated. Methods This retrospective study gathered data on patients who underwent CABG or CABG combined with other concomitant surgical interventions, such as carotid common or external carotid artery endarterectomy, thoracic aortic aneurysm repair, and aortic or mitral valve replacement or decalcification procedures, at a single tertiary care facility from January 2011 to December 2020. Researchers collected demographic, clinical, and laboratory information, including MELD score and European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) data. The patients were divided into two groups: the first group included only those who underwent CABG, while the second group comprised patients who underwent CABG along with other concomitant cardiac interventions. Results The MELD score at discharge was significantly higher in the CABG and other interventions group compared to the CABG-only group (median = 14.09, IQR = 7.41-18.7 vs. median = 6.41, IQR = 4.61-9.44, p < 0.001). However, the difference in MELD score at admission between the two groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.328). A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically relevant, indicating that liver function worsened postoperatively in the patients with additional interventions. The EuroSCORE was also significantly higher in the CABG and other interventions group, suggesting a higher surgical risk as expected (median = 5.74, IQR = 3.54-11.47 vs. median = 3.34, IQR = 1.97-5.66, p < 0.001). Additionally, differences in laboratory parameters, especially coagulation and hemostasis indicators throughout the postoperative period, including the ICU stay (divided into four equal periods based on each patient's total ICU length of stay) and at discharge, indicate a more complex biological state in patients with additional interventions. These findings may have implications for perioperative management and long-term outcomes. Conclusions The elevated MELD score in patients undergoing CABG with additional interventions emphasizes the need for close monitoring of liver function and coagulation status. Evaluating hepatic status preoperatively would be beneficial, and incorporating liver-protective strategies could help mitigate postoperative repercussions. It may also be useful to include liver function parameters in existing cardiovascular risk scores to improve risk assessment.
背景 冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)是一种用于治疗严重冠状动脉疾病的常见外科手术。终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分已成为评估肝病严重程度和确定肝移植优先级的广泛使用的预后指标。然而,其在预测心脏手术结果方面的效用尚未得到广泛评估。
方法 这项回顾性研究收集了2011年1月至2020年12月在一家三级医疗中心接受CABG或CABG联合其他伴随手术干预(如颈总动脉或颈外动脉内膜切除术、胸主动脉瘤修复以及主动脉或二尖瓣置换或脱钙手术)的患者的数据。研究人员收集了人口统计学、临床和实验室信息,包括MELD评分和欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)数据。患者分为两组:第一组仅包括接受CABG的患者,而第二组包括接受CABG以及其他伴随心脏干预的患者。
结果 与仅接受CABG的组相比,CABG及其他干预组出院时的MELD评分显著更高(中位数 = 14.09,四分位间距 = 7.41 - 18.7 vs. 中位数 = 6.41,四分位间距 = 4.61 - 9.44,p < 0.001)。然而,两组入院时MELD评分的差异无统计学意义(p = 0.328)。p值 < 0.05被认为具有统计学相关性,表明接受额外干预的患者术后肝功能恶化。CABG及其他干预组的EuroSCORE也显著更高,表明手术风险如预期更高(中位数 = 5.74,四分位间距 = 3.54 - 11.47 vs. 中位数 = 3.34,四分位间距 = 1.97 - 5.66,p < 0.001)。此外,实验室参数的差异,特别是术后整个期间(包括重症监护病房停留期间(根据每位患者的重症监护病房总停留时间分为四个相等时间段))和出院时的凝血和止血指标,表明接受额外干预的患者的生物学状态更为复杂。这些发现可能对围手术期管理和长期结果有影响。
结论 接受额外干预的CABG患者中升高的MELD评分强调了密切监测肝功能和凝血状态的必要性。术前评估肝脏状态将是有益的,纳入肝脏保护策略有助于减轻术后影响。将肝功能参数纳入现有的心血管风险评分中以改善风险评估也可能是有用的。