Park Nancy, Medvecky Hugh, Moran Jay, Medvecky Michael J
Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2024 Dec 24;14(4). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00065. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.
For complete disruption of the posterolateral corner (PLC) structures, operative treatment is most commonly advocated, as nonoperative treatment has higher rates of persistent lateral laxity and posttraumatic arthritis. Some studies have shown that acute direct repair results in revision rates upwards of 37% to 40% compared with 6% to 9% for initial reconstruction. In a recent study assessing the outcomes of acute repair of PLC avulsion injuries with 2 to 7 years of follow-up, patients with adequate tissue were shown to have a much lower failure rate than previously documented. In the present video article, we demonstrate a transosseous Krackow pull-through technique for repair of acute avulsion-type PLC multiligamentous knee injuries with no midsubstance injury.
An incision is made along the lateral aspect of the knee from the epicondyle to the fibular shaft. The soft-tissue avulsion injury is identified and tagged with suture. Locking Krackow sutures are placed into the injured structures without separating the soft-tissue sleeve avulsion. With fibular avulsions, fibular and tibial transosseous tunnels are drilled with 2 Beath pins through the fibular head and tibia, exiting through the anteromedial tibial cortex. Lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and anterior biceps sutures are passed through the anterior tunnel, and popliteofibular ligament (PFL) and posterior biceps sutures are passed through the posterior tunnel. A small incision is made over the anteromedial tibial cortex in order to tie the sutures over the same metallic button. In fibular head avulsion fractures, high-strength suture placed through the fibular neck can provide additional compression. For proximal PLC injuries, the iliotibial band is incised at the lateral epicondyle, and the proximal attachment sites of the LCL and popliteus are localized. Krackow locking sutures are placed within the LCL and popliteus tendon. Transosseous tunnels are drilled with Beath pins through the native attachment sites of the LCL and popliteus on the lateral condyle and are directed anteriorly to avoid convergence with a potential anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) femoral tunnel. Sutures are pulled through the femoral attachment sites and tied over the same metallic button.
For acute PLC injuries, nonoperative treatment is not endorsed for the majority of cases. Surgical options include direct repair, repair with augmentation, or reconstruction.
The transosseous Krackow pull-through technique allows for an enhanced and secure soft-tissue repair while avoiding suture anchor pull-out from the metaphyseal fibular head bone, which can also be compromised by cortical avulsion fractures. This procedure avoids the cost of an allograft and the donor-site morbidity of an autograft that are associated with a reconstruction. For patients with midsubstance tears, chronic injuries, and/or inadequate tissue quality, reconstructions or augmentations are more appropriate. According to Moran et al., this technique can result in a similar failure rate (10.7%) to initial reconstruction and a far lower failure rate than seen in other PLC repair techniques. The present technique has a comparatively more reliable fixation method, as the suture is secured to dense tibial cortical bone, avoiding the suture anchor dislodgement that can occur with solely fibular fixation. This is advantageous when the fibular bone is fragile or fractured. Suture pull-out may be further prevented with multiple locking Krackow sutures.
At a mean follow-up of 2 years (range, 3 to 90 months), Moran et al. reported a failure rate of 10.7%, which was significantly lower than the failure rate of 38% reported in a 2016 systematic review of PLC repairs. On clinical examination, the procedure yielded a significant decrease in lateral compartment opening, from 9 mm preoperatively to 0 mm postoperatively.
For distal PLC injuries, perform a peroneal neurolysis to identify and decompress the peroneal nerve.Carefully evaluate the soft tissue proximal to the avulsed portion to determine if any midsubstance tearing is present.
PLC = posterolateral cornerLCL = lateral collateral ligamentPFL = popliteofibular ligamentACL = anterior cruciate ligamentALL = anterolateral ligamentMRI = magnetic resonance imagingAM = anteromedialPCL = posterior cruciate ligamentFU = follow-upPROM = patient-reported outcome measureTDWB = touch-down weight-bearing.
对于后外侧角(PLC)结构的完全断裂,由于非手术治疗导致持续性外侧松弛和创伤后关节炎的发生率较高,因此最常提倡手术治疗。一些研究表明,急性直接修复的翻修率高达37%至40%,而初次重建的翻修率为6%至9%。在最近一项评估PLC撕脱伤急性修复结果并进行2至7年随访的研究中,组织条件良好的患者显示出比先前记录的低得多的失败率。在本视频文章中,我们展示一种经骨Krackow贯穿技术,用于修复急性撕脱型PLC多韧带膝关节损伤且无中间实质损伤。
沿膝关节外侧从髁上至腓骨干做切口。识别软组织撕脱伤并用缝线标记。在不分离软组织袖套撕脱的情况下,将锁定Krackow缝线置入受伤结构。对于腓骨撕脱,用2枚Beath针分别穿过腓骨头和胫骨钻出腓骨和胫骨经骨隧道,从胫骨内侧皮质穿出。外侧副韧带(LCL)和肱二头肌前部缝线从前侧隧道穿出,腘腓韧带(PFL)和肱二头肌后部缝线从后侧隧道穿出。在胫骨内侧皮质上方做一个小切口,以便在同一金属纽扣上打结缝线。对于腓骨头撕脱骨折,通过腓骨颈置入高强度缝线可提供额外加压。对于近端PLC损伤,在外侧髁处切开髂胫束,定位LCL和腘肌的近端附着点。将Krackow锁定缝线置入LCL和腘肌腱内。用Beath针通过外侧髁上LCL和腘肌的原附着点钻出经骨隧道,并向前穿出以避免与潜在的前交叉韧带(ACL)股骨隧道汇聚。缝线穿过股骨附着点并在同一金属纽扣上打结。
对于急性PLC损伤,大多数情况下不支持非手术治疗。手术选择包括直接修复、增强修复或重建。
经骨Krackow贯穿技术可实现增强且稳固的软组织修复,同时避免缝线锚钉从腓骨近端干骺端骨拔出,腓骨近端干骺端骨也可能因皮质撕脱骨折而受损。该手术避免了与重建相关的同种异体移植物成本和自体移植物供区并发症。对于中间实质撕裂、慢性损伤和/或组织质量不佳的患者,重建或增强修复更为合适。根据莫兰等人的研究,该技术可导致与初次重建相似的失败率(10.7%),且失败率远低于其他PLC修复技术。本技术具有相对更可靠的固定方法,因为缝线固定于致密的胫骨皮质骨,避免了仅腓骨固定时可能发生的缝线锚钉移位。当腓骨骨质脆弱或骨折时这具有优势。使用多根锁定Krackow缝线可进一步防止缝线拔出。
在平均2年的随访(范围3至90个月)中,莫兰等人报告失败率为10.7%,显著低于2016年PLC修复系统评价中报告的38%的失败率。临床检查显示,该手术使外侧间室开口明显减小,从术前的9毫米降至术后的0毫米。
对于远端PLC损伤,进行腓总神经松解以识别并减压腓总神经。仔细评估撕脱部分近端的软组织,以确定是否存在中间实质撕裂。
PLC = 后外侧角;LCL = 外侧副韧带;PFL = 腘腓韧带;ACL = 前交叉韧带;ALL = 前外侧韧带;MRI = 磁共振成像;AM = 内侧;PCL = 后交叉韧带;FU = 随访;PROM = 患者报告结局指标;TDWB = 触地负重