Zhou Wen-Jie, Huang Jin-Tao, Lu Xin, Hu Di, Hong Xin, Wang Fu-An, Lv Peng-Hua, Zhu Xiao-Li
Department of Interventional Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, People's Republic of China.
Department of Interventional Radiology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, People's Republic of China.
J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2024 Dec 20;11:2515-2524. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S494520. eCollection 2024.
Camrelizumab and rivoceranib together provide a new first-line treatment approach for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Meanwhile, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is an effective method for the local control of the HCC. The study compared the clinical benefit and safety between TACE with camrelizumab-rivoceranib and camrelizumab-rivoceranib alone for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC)-C HCC patients.
This multi-center retrospective analysis included continuous BCLC-C HCC patients who received camrelizumab-rivoceranib with TACE and camrelizumab-rivoceranib alone from January 2020 to December 2022. The therapeutic response, progression-free survival (PFS), safety, and overall survival (OS) were compared. The quantitative data were compared via the -test or Mann-Whitney -test. Comparison of the categorical data was done by chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. The comparison of PFS with OS was compared by Log rank test. A Multivariate Cox regression test was utilized to identify risk variables for both PFS and OS.
This analysis comprised 132 BCLC-C HCC patients who received camrelizumab-rivoceranib alone (n = 74) or combined treatment (n = 58). The combined group displayed higher partial response (44.8% vs 21.6%, = 0.004) and total response (55.2% versus 36.5%, = 0.032) rates than camrelizumab-rivoceranib alone group. The median PFS (13.5 months vs 10.3 months, = 0.046) and OS (22.8 months vs 18.4 months, = 0.041) for the combined group was significantly longer relative to the camrelizumab-rivoceranib alone group. Additional risk factors, excluding the therapy option, were a higher alpha-fetoprotein level and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. The incident rates of camrelizumab-rivoceranib-related advents were comparable between combined and camrelizumab-rivoceranib alone groups (46.3% vs 51.4%, = 0.572). The combined group contained 33 patients (56.9%) who experienced temporary post-embolization symptoms.
For BCLC-C HCC patients, TACE may significantly increase the therapeutic effectiveness of camrelizumab-rivoceranib without increasing the risk of camrelizumab-rivoceranib-related complications.
卡瑞利珠单抗和瑞沃替尼联合使用为不可切除肝细胞癌(HCC)提供了一种新的一线治疗方法。同时,经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)是局部控制HCC的有效方法。本研究比较了TACE联合卡瑞利珠单抗-瑞沃替尼与单独使用卡瑞利珠单抗-瑞沃替尼治疗巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)-C期HCC患者的临床获益和安全性。
本多中心回顾性分析纳入了2020年1月至2022年12月期间接受卡瑞利珠单抗-瑞沃替尼联合TACE治疗以及单独接受卡瑞利珠单抗-瑞沃替尼治疗的连续性BCLC-C期HCC患者。比较了治疗反应、无进展生存期(PFS)、安全性和总生存期(OS)。定量数据通过t检验或Mann-Whitney U检验进行比较。分类数据的比较通过卡方检验或Fisher精确检验进行。PFS与OS的比较通过Log rank检验进行。采用多变量Cox回归检验确定PFS和OS的风险变量。
本分析包括132例BCLC-C期HCC患者,其中单独接受卡瑞利珠单抗-瑞沃替尼治疗的有74例(n = 74),接受联合治疗的有58例(n = 58)。联合治疗组的部分缓解率(44.8%对21.6%,P = 0.004)和总缓解率(55.2%对36.5%,P = 0.032)均高于单独使用卡瑞利珠单抗-瑞沃替尼组。联合治疗组的中位PFS(13.5个月对10.3个月,P = 0.046)和OS(22.8个月对18.4个月,P = 0.041)显著长于单独使用卡瑞利珠单抗-瑞沃替尼组。除治疗方案外,其他风险因素包括较高的甲胎蛋白水平和东部肿瘤协作组体能状态。联合治疗组与单独使用卡瑞利珠单抗-瑞沃替尼组的卡瑞利珠单抗-瑞沃替尼相关不良反应发生率相当(46.3%对51.4%,P = 0.572)。联合治疗组有33例患者(56.9%)出现栓塞后短暂症状。
对于BCLC-C期HCC患者,TACE可显著提高卡瑞利珠单抗-瑞沃替尼的治疗效果,且不增加卡瑞利珠单抗-瑞沃替尼相关并发症的风险。