Naraharisetti Ramya, Trangucci Rob, Sakrejda Krzysztof, Masters Nina B, Malosh Ryan, Martin Emily T, Eisenberg Marisa, Link Bruce, Eisenberg Joseph N S, Zelner Jon
Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Center for Social Epidemiology and Population Health (CSEPH), University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Dec 24;12(1):ofae636. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae636. eCollection 2025 Jan.
Disparities in coronavirus disease 2019 mortality are driven by inequalities in group-specific incidence rates (IRs), case fatality rates (CFRs), and their interaction. For emerging infections, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, group-specific IRs and CFRs change on different time scales, and inequities in these measures may reflect different social and medical mechanisms. To be useful tools for public health surveillance and policy, analyses of changing mortality rate disparities must independently address changes in IRs and CFRs. However, this is rarely done. In this analysis, we examine the separate contributions of disparities in the timing of infection-reflecting differential infection risk factors such as residential segregation, housing, and participation in essential work-and declining CFRs over time on mortality disparities by race/ethnicity in the US state of Michigan. We used detailed case data to decompose race/ethnicity-specific mortality rates into their age-specific IR and CFR components during each of 3 periods from March to December 2020. We used these estimates in a counterfactual simulation model to estimate that that 35% (95% credible interval, 30%-40%) of deaths in black Michigan residents could have been prevented if these residents were infected along the timeline experienced by white residents, resulting in a 67% (61%-72%) reduction in the mortality rate gap between black and white Michigan residents during 2020. These results clearly illustrate why differential power to "wait out" infection during an infectious disease emergency-a function of structural racism-is a key, underappreciated, driver of inequality in disease and death from emerging infections.
2019冠状病毒病死亡率的差异是由特定群体发病率(IR)、病死率(CFR)及其相互作用的不平等所驱动的。对于诸如严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2等新发感染,特定群体的发病率和病死率在不同的时间尺度上变化,这些指标的不平等可能反映了不同的社会和医学机制。为了成为公共卫生监测和政策的有用工具,对死亡率差异变化的分析必须独立地考虑发病率和病死率的变化。然而,很少有人这样做。在本分析中,我们研究了感染时间差异(反映居住隔离、住房和从事必要工作等不同感染风险因素)以及随着时间推移病死率下降对美国密歇根州不同种族/族裔死亡率差异的单独影响。我们使用详细的病例数据,将2020年3月至12月三个时期内每个时期按种族/族裔划分的死亡率分解为按年龄划分的发病率和病死率组成部分。我们在一个反事实模拟模型中使用这些估计值,以估计如果密歇根州的黑人居民按照白人居民经历的时间线感染,那么35%(95%可信区间为30%-40%)的黑人居民死亡本可避免,这将使2020年密歇根州黑人和白人居民之间的死亡率差距缩小67%(61%-72%)。这些结果清楚地说明了为什么在传染病紧急情况下“等待”感染的不同能力(这是结构性种族主义的一种表现)是新发感染导致的疾病和死亡不平等的一个关键但未得到充分认识的驱动因素。