Payabyab Eden C, Elbaum Lindsay S, Sharma Navneet, George Isaac, Mick Stephanie L
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine New York City, NY.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital New York City, NY.
US Cardiol. 2021 Nov 29;15:e25. doi: 10.15420/usc.2021.16. eCollection 2021.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become a widely adopted treatment modality for severe aortic stenosis. Transfemoral access is the approach of choice; however, approximately 25% of patients undergoing TAVR also have concomitant peripheral arterial disease. The recent advent of intravascular lithotripsy has enabled preservation of transfemoral access in some patients; although, a proportion still require alternative, non-femoral access. Alternative access sites can be broadly categorized into transthoracic and peripheral, facilitated by surgical or percutaneous techniques. In this review, the technical details and clinical outcomes of various TAVR accesses are discussed. Initially, transthoracic approaches were most common, but recently, the trend has been toward alternative peripheral access due to superior outcomes. Although there are no randomized data to support all the alternative access sites, the experiences reported provide available options for a large portion of patients to be candidates for TAVR. The intervention site should be selected by a multidisciplinary heart team based on patient anatomical factors and institutional expertise.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)已成为治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄的一种广泛应用的治疗方式。经股动脉入路是首选方法;然而,接受TAVR治疗的患者中约有25%同时患有外周动脉疾病。血管内碎石术的最新出现使得一些患者能够保留经股动脉入路;尽管如此,仍有一部分患者需要选择非股动脉的替代入路。替代入路部位可大致分为经胸和外周入路,可通过手术或经皮技术实现。在本综述中,将讨论各种TAVR入路的技术细节和临床结果。最初,经胸入路最为常见,但最近,由于效果更佳,趋势已转向替代外周入路。尽管尚无随机数据支持所有替代入路部位,但所报告的经验为大部分适合TAVR的患者提供了可用选择。干预部位应由多学科心脏团队根据患者解剖因素和机构专业知识来选择。