Suppr超能文献

当代胸骨上经导管主动脉瓣置换术:一种使用简单、可靠的替代入路方法的多中心经验。

Contemporary suprasternal transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A multicenter experience using a simple, reliable alternative access approach.

机构信息

Princeton Baptist Medical Center/Brookwood Baptist Health System, Birmingham, Alabama.

Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 May 1;95(6):1178-1183. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28460. Epub 2019 Aug 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe outcomes after suprasternal (SS) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) as a new alternative access approach.

BACKGROUND

There still remains a cohort of the TAVR population who are not suitable for a transfemoral (TF) approach. SS-TAVR is a safe and effective alternative to TF-TAVR and has now become our preferred alternative access route.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients from New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center and Princeton Baptist Medical Center who underwent SS-TAVR from 2015 to July 2018. A total of 84 patients were included in the study.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in all cases. Thirty-day survival was 98.8% (n = 83). There were minimal complications. Most notably, there were no transient ischemic attacks or strokes (0%, n = 0). Reexploration for bleeding was 3.6% (n = 3), and major bleeding was 1.7% (n = 1). We also achieved satisfactory results with a mean aortic valve gradient of 6.07 ± 3.79 mmHg and an aortic valve area of 2.21 ± 0.51 cm . No patients had anything more than mild paravalvular leak. The mean length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit was 1.42 ± 1.23 days, and hospital LOS was 4.20 ± 3.29 days.

CONCLUSIONS

SS access for TAVR is an extremely important technique to have in any valve team's alternative access armamentarium. This technique can be safely and reliably reproduced with any standard hybrid operating room setup and no additional equipment, and it can be used with any commercially available valve system. In the current experience, minimal complications and excellent early term results were obtained.

摘要

目的

描述胸骨上(SS)经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)作为一种新的入路选择的结果。

背景

仍有一部分 TAVR 人群不适合经股动脉(TF)入路。SS-TAVR 是 TF-TAVR 的一种安全有效的替代方法,现在已成为我们首选的替代入路。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2015 年至 2018 年 7 月期间在纽约长老会医院、哥伦比亚大学医学中心和普林斯顿浸信会医学中心接受 SS-TAVR 的所有患者。共有 84 例患者纳入研究。

结果

所有病例均获得技术成功。30 天生存率为 98.8%(n=83)。并发症很少见。最值得注意的是,没有发生短暂性脑缺血发作或中风(0%,n=0)。因出血再次探查的比例为 3.6%(n=3),大出血的比例为 1.7%(n=1)。我们还取得了满意的结果,平均主动脉瓣跨瓣压差为 6.07±3.79mmHg,主动脉瓣面积为 2.21±0.51cm²。没有患者出现瓣周漏超过轻度。重症监护病房的平均住院时间(LOS)为 1.42±1.23 天,医院 LOS 为 4.20±3.29 天。

结论

SS 入路 TAVR 是任何瓣膜团队的替代入路武器库中非常重要的技术。这种技术可以在任何标准的杂交手术室设置和没有额外设备的情况下安全可靠地复制,并且可以与任何商业上可用的瓣膜系统一起使用。在目前的经验中,获得了最小的并发症和极好的早期结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验