Suppr超能文献

一项最新的系统评价和荟萃分析,探讨富马酸二甲酯(DMF)对多发性硬化症(MS)患者的疗效和安全性。

An updated systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the efficacy and safety of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).

作者信息

Ali Hossam Tharwat, Yousef Amr Mahmoud, El-Farargy Sara Hosny, Abdelmonhem Ahmed Mohamed, Abouda Dalia Atef, Mahmoud Ahmed Mamdoh, Elsayed Ammar Arafat, Hassaan Hazem Khaled, Afifi Ahmed M

机构信息

Qena Faculty of Medicine, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt.

Benha Students' Innovation and Research Association (BSIRA), Benha, Egypt.

出版信息

BMJ Neurol Open. 2024 Dec 18;6(2):e000872. doi: 10.1136/bmjno-2024-000872. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is increasingly used in treating multiple sclerosis (MS) with controversial results of the safety and efficacy of different DMF doses. We aimed to systematically review the literature to examine the safety and efficacy of DMF for MS patients.

METHODS

We searched PubMed Medline, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus databases and clinicaltrials.gov up to June 2023 for the published trials evaluating the use of DMF for MS in adults. All included studies were screened and abstracted independently by two authors. Efficacy and safety outcome measures were extracted. The meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4.

RESULTS

10 studies including eight randomised controlled trials, one open-label and one single-arm before-after study with a total population size of 4278 patients were included. DMF group showed a statistically significant reduction in the proportion of relapses compared with the control group, (OR: 0.47, 95% CI: [0.41, 0.55], p<0.00001) with no statistical differences between 240 mg two times per day and three times a day doses. Furthermore, the DMF group had a significant reduction in Gd-enhanced lesions compared with control (MD=-1.53, 95% CI: [-1.91 to -1.41], p<0.00001). Our results showed a non-significant difference in adverse events that led to discontinuation of the study with an OR of 1.29 (95% CI: [0.98, 1.71], p value=0.07).

DISCUSSION

DMF had significant efficacy and safety compared with the control, with no difference between the DMF doses. More studies with large sample sizes and longer follow-ups are needed to detect long-term safety and efficacy.

摘要

背景

富马酸二甲酯(DMF)越来越多地用于治疗多发性硬化症(MS),不同DMF剂量的安全性和有效性结果存在争议。我们旨在系统回顾文献,以研究DMF对MS患者的安全性和有效性。

方法

我们检索了截至2023年6月的PubMed Medline、Cochrane、科学网、Scopus数据库和clinicaltrials.gov,以查找评估DMF在成人MS中使用情况的已发表试验。所有纳入研究均由两位作者独立筛选和提取摘要。提取疗效和安全性结局指标。使用Review Manager 5.4进行荟萃分析。

结果

纳入了10项研究,包括8项随机对照试验、1项开放标签试验和1项前后单臂研究,总样本量为4278例患者。与对照组相比,DMF组的复发比例有统计学显著降低(OR:0.47,95%CI:[0.41,0.55],p<0.00001),每天两次240mg剂量和每天三次剂量之间无统计学差异。此外,与对照组相比,DMF组的钆增强病灶有显著减少(MD=-1.53,95%CI:[-1.91至-1.41],p<0.00001)。我们的结果显示,导致研究中止的不良事件无显著差异,OR为1.29(95%CI:[0.98,1.71],p值=0.07)。

讨论

与对照组相比,DMF具有显著的疗效和安全性,不同DMF剂量之间无差异。需要更多大样本量和更长随访时间的研究来检测长期安全性和有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed72/11667417/4dde76c38ea3/bmjno-6-2-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验