Velasco F, Velasco M, Pacheco T, Márquez I
Exp Neurol. 1985 Mar;87(3):533-43. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(85)90182-7.
Push-pull perfusions of pentylenetetrazol (PTZ) were carried out in the mesencephalon and cerebral cortex (orbitofrontal, motor, and suprasylvian) of "encéphale isolé" cats, while EEG recordings from motor cortices and EMG of facial muscles were obtained. There were significant differences between perfusions in the mesencephalic reticular formation (MRF) and in the cerebral cortex: (i) EEG spikes not accompanied by muscular contractions occurred during perfusion of cerebral cortex (motor cortex included), but never with perfusions in MRF. (ii) In some instances muscular tonic and clonic contractions occurred in the absence of EEG spikes when perfusing the mesencephalon, but never with cortical perfusions. (iii) Both MRF and cortical perfusions induced EEG spikes accompanied by myoclonic seizures; however, muscular seizures were practically of the same amplitude in both sides after perfusion of the MRF and were predominant in the contralateral side after cortical perfusions. In addition, significantly less perfusion time (total dose) of PTZ was needed to induce such events in the MRF than in the cerebral cortex. (iv) Generalized seizures induced by cortical perfusions showed a clear predominance of contractions in the muscles contralateral to the perfusion site, whereas perfusions in the MRF induced generalized seizures indistinguishable from those produced by i.v. administration of PTZ. Results suggest that PTZ generalized seizures, closely resembling the so called "primary generalized seizures," result from activation of the MRF, whereas PTZ acting in the cerebral cortex produces a model of focal convulsions that may become secondarily generalized.
在“孤立脑”猫的中脑和大脑皮质(眶额、运动和上薛氏回)进行戊四氮(PTZ)的推挽式灌注,同时记录运动皮质的脑电图和面部肌肉的肌电图。中脑网状结构(MRF)和大脑皮质的灌注之间存在显著差异:(i)在大脑皮质(包括运动皮质)灌注期间出现了不伴有肌肉收缩的脑电图棘波,但在MRF灌注时从未出现。(ii)在某些情况下,灌注中脑时在没有脑电图棘波的情况下出现了肌肉强直性和阵挛性收缩,但在皮质灌注时从未出现。(iii)MRF和皮质灌注均诱发伴有肌阵挛性发作的脑电图棘波;然而,MRF灌注后两侧肌肉发作的幅度实际上相同,而皮质灌注后肌肉发作主要出现在对侧。此外,与大脑皮质相比,在MRF中诱发此类事件所需的PTZ灌注时间(总剂量)明显更少。(iv)皮质灌注诱发的全身性发作显示,灌注部位对侧肌肉的收缩明显占优势,而MRF灌注诱发的全身性发作与静脉注射PTZ产生的发作难以区分。结果表明,PTZ全身性发作与所谓的“原发性全身性发作”非常相似,是由MRF激活引起的,而PTZ作用于大脑皮质则产生局灶性惊厥模型,可能继发全身性发作。