Brief Report: Protease Inhibitors Versus Nonnucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors and the Risk of Cancer Among People With HIV.

BACKGROUND

The effect of initial antiretroviral therapy (ART) class on cancer risk in people with HIV (PWH) remains unclear.

SETTING

Cohort study of 36,322 PWH enrolled (1996-2014) in the North American AIDS Cohort Collaboration on Research and Design.

METHODS

We followed individuals from ART initiation (protease inhibitor [PI]-, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor [NNRTI]-, or integrase strand transfer inhibitor [INSTI]-based) until incident cancer, death, loss-to-follow-up, 12/31/2014, 85 months (intention-to-treat analyses [ITT]), or 30 months (per-protocol [PP] analyses). Cancers were grouped (non-mutually exclusive) as: any cancer, AIDS-defining cancers (ADC), non-AIDS-defining cancers (NADC), any infection-related cancer, and common individual cancer types. We estimated adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) comparing cancer risk by ART class using marginal structural models emulating ITT and PP trials.

RESULTS

We observed 17,004 PWH (954 cancers) with PI-based (median 6 years follow-up), 17,536 (770 cancers) with NNRTI-based (median 5 years follow-up) and 1,782 (29 cancers) with INSTI-based ART (median 2 years follow-up). Analyses with 85 months follow-up indicated no cancer risk differences. In truncated analyses, risk of ADCs (aHR 1.33; 95% CI 1.00, 1.77 [PP-analysis]) and NADCs (aHR 1.23; 95% CI 1.00, 1.51[ITT-analysis]) were higher comparing PIs vs. NNRTIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Results with longer-term follow-up suggest being on a PI- versus NNRTI-based ART regimen does not affect cancer risk. We observed shorter-term associations that should be interpreted cautiously and warrant further study. Further research with longer duration of follow-up that can evaluate INSTIs, the current first-line recommended therapy, is needed to comprehensively characterize the association between ART class and cancer risk.