Braun D R, Carvalho S, Kaplan R S, Beardmore-Herd M, Plummer T, Biro D, Matsuzawa T
Center for the Advanced Study of Human Paleobiology, Department of Anthropology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA; Technological Primates Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, 04103, Germany.
Primate Models for Behavioural Evolution Lab, Institute of Human Sciences, University of Oxford, 64 Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 6PN, United Kingdom; Interdisciplinary Center for Archaeology and the Evolution of Human Behavior, University of Algarve, Portugal.
J Hum Evol. 2025 Feb;199:103625. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2024.103625. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
The use of broad tool repertoires to increase dietary flexibility through extractive foraging behaviors is shared by humans and their closest living relatives (chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes). However, comparisons between tool use in ancient human ancestors (hominins) and chimpanzees are limited by differences in their toolkits. One feature shared by primate and hominin toolkits is rock selection based on physical properties of the stones and the targets of foraging behaviors. Here, we document the selectivity patterns of stone tools used by wild chimpanzees to crack nuts at Bossou, Guinea, through controlled experiments that introduce rocks unknown to this population. Experiments incorporate specific rock types because previous studies document hominin selection of these lithologies at Kanjera South 2 Ma. We investigate decisions made by chimpanzees when selecting stones that vary in their mechanical properties-features not directly visible to the individual. Results indicate that the selection of anvils and hammers is linked to task-specific mechanical properties. Chimpanzees select harder stones for hammers and softer stones for anvils, indicating an understanding of specific properties for distinct functions. Selectivity of rock types suggests that chimpanzees assess the appropriate materials for functions by discriminating these 'invisible' properties. Adults identify mechanical properties through individual learning, and juveniles often reused the tools selected by adults. Selection of specific rock types may be transmitted through the reuse of combinations of rocks. These patterns of stone selection parallel what is documented for Oldowan hominins. The processes identified in this experiment provide insights into the discrete nature of hominin rock selection patterns in Plio-Pleistocene stone artifact production.
人类及其现存的近亲(黑猩猩,即Pan troglodytes)都通过采集觅食行为使用多种工具来增加饮食的灵活性。然而,古代人类祖先(原始人类)与黑猩猩在工具使用上的比较受到它们工具包差异的限制。灵长类动物和原始人类工具包的一个共同特征是根据石头的物理特性和觅食行为的目标来选择石头。在这里,我们通过引入该群体不熟悉的岩石的对照实验,记录了几内亚博苏的野生黑猩猩用于砸坚果的石器的选择模式。实验纳入了特定的岩石类型,因为之前的研究记录了200万年前原始人类在南坎杰拉对这些岩性的选择。我们研究了黑猩猩在选择机械性能不同的石头时所做的决定——这些特性个体无法直接看到。结果表明,砧石和锤石的选择与特定任务的机械性能有关。黑猩猩选择较硬的石头作为锤石,较软的石头作为砧石,这表明它们理解了不同功能所需的特定特性。岩石类型的选择性表明,黑猩猩通过区分这些“不可见”的特性来评估适合不同功能的材料。成年黑猩猩通过个体学习识别机械性能,幼年黑猩猩经常重复使用成年黑猩猩选择的工具。特定岩石类型的选择可能通过岩石组合的重复使用来传递。这些石头选择模式与奥杜威峡谷原始人类的记录相似。本实验中确定的过程为上新世 - 更新世石器生产中原始人类岩石选择模式的离散性质提供了见解。