• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型眼动追踪指标系统:在自闭症谱系障碍早期诊断中的价值

New eye tracking metrics system: the value in early diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder.

作者信息

Wang Raymond Kong, Kwong Kenneth, Liu Kevin, Kong Xue-Jun

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 11;15:1518180. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1518180. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1518180
PMID:39722847
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11668771/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Eye tracking (ET) is emerging as a promising early and objective screening method for autism spectrum disorders (ASD), but it requires more reliable metrics with enhanced sensitivity and specificity for clinical use.

METHODS

This study introduces a suite of novel ET metrics: Area of Interest (AOI) Switch Counts (ASC), Favorable AOI Shifts (FAS) along self-determined pathways, and AOI Vacancy Counts (AVC), applied to toddlers and preschoolers diagnosed with ASD. The correlation between these new ET metrics and Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition (ADOS-2) scores via linear regression and sensitivity and specificity of the cut-off scores were assessed to predict diagnosis.

RESULTS

Our findings indicate significantly lower FAS and ASC and higher AVC (P<0.05) in children with ASD compared to their non-ASD counterparts within this high-risk cohort; the significance was not seen in total fixation time neither pupil size (p > 0.05). Furthermore, FAS was negatively correlated with ADOS-2 total scores and social affect (SA) subscale (p < 0.05). Among these new ET metrics, AVC yielded the best sensitivity 88-100% and specificity 80-88% with cut off score 0.305-0.306, followed by FAS and ASC to separate ASD from non-ASD for diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the utility of innovative ET metrics-FAS, AVC, and ASC-which exhibit markedly improved sensitivity and specificity, enhancing ASD screening and diagnostic processes.

摘要

背景

眼动追踪(ET)正在成为一种有前景的用于自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的早期客观筛查方法,但它需要更可靠的指标,以提高临床应用中的敏感性和特异性。

方法

本研究引入了一套新颖的眼动追踪指标:感兴趣区域(AOI)切换计数(ASC)、沿自主确定路径的有利AOI转移(FAS)和AOI空缺计数(AVC),并将其应用于被诊断为ASD的幼儿和学龄前儿童。通过线性回归评估这些新的眼动追踪指标与《自闭症诊断观察量表第二版》(ADOS-2)得分之间的相关性,并评估截止分数的敏感性和特异性以预测诊断。

结果

我们的研究结果表明,在这个高危队列中,与非ASD儿童相比,ASD儿童的FAS和ASC显著更低,AVC更高(P<0.05);在总注视时间和瞳孔大小方面均未发现显著差异(p>0.05)。此外,FAS与ADOS-2总分和社会情感(SA)子量表呈负相关(p<0.05)。在这些新的眼动追踪指标中,AVC在截止分数为0.305 - 0.306时,产生了最佳的敏感性88 - 100%和特异性80 - 88%,其次是FAS和ASC,可用于区分ASD和非ASD以进行诊断。

结论

本研究证实了创新的眼动追踪指标——FAS、AVC和ASC的实用性,这些指标表现出显著提高的敏感性和特异性,增强了ASD的筛查和诊断过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d7b/11668771/6a497504361f/fpsyt-15-1518180-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d7b/11668771/1bbb8a4eccd1/fpsyt-15-1518180-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d7b/11668771/f272f8bc55c9/fpsyt-15-1518180-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d7b/11668771/f895e7e3aff7/fpsyt-15-1518180-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d7b/11668771/70c3a1311fc7/fpsyt-15-1518180-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d7b/11668771/6a497504361f/fpsyt-15-1518180-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d7b/11668771/1bbb8a4eccd1/fpsyt-15-1518180-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d7b/11668771/f272f8bc55c9/fpsyt-15-1518180-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d7b/11668771/f895e7e3aff7/fpsyt-15-1518180-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d7b/11668771/70c3a1311fc7/fpsyt-15-1518180-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d7b/11668771/6a497504361f/fpsyt-15-1518180-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
New eye tracking metrics system: the value in early diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder.新型眼动追踪指标系统:在自闭症谱系障碍早期诊断中的价值
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 11;15:1518180. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1518180. eCollection 2024.
2
Replication study for ADOS-2 cut-offs to assist evaluation of autism spectrum disorder.ADOS-2 截断值复制研究以辅助孤独症谱系障碍评估。
Autism Res. 2022 Nov;15(11):2181-2191. doi: 10.1002/aur.2801. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
3
Replication study of ADOS-2 Toddler Module cut-off scores for autism spectrum disorder classification.ADOS-2 幼儿模块截断分数在自闭症谱系障碍分类中的复制研究。
Autism Res. 2021 Jun;14(6):1284-1295. doi: 10.1002/aur.2496. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
4
Validation of Rapid Interactive Screening Test for Autism in Toddlers Using Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule™ Second Edition in Children at High-Risk for Autism Spectrum Disorder.使用《孤独症诊断观察量表》第二版对孤独症谱系障碍高危儿童进行幼儿孤独症快速互动筛查测试的验证
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 1;12:737890. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.737890. eCollection 2021.
5
Diagnostic tests for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in preschool children.学龄前儿童自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的诊断测试。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 24;7(7):CD009044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009044.pub2.
6
Identification of diagnostic markers for ASD: a restrictive interest analysis based on EEG combined with eye tracking.自闭症谱系障碍诊断标志物的识别:基于脑电图结合眼动追踪的狭窄兴趣分析
Front Neurosci. 2023 Oct 11;17:1236637. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1236637. eCollection 2023.
7
Examining the Diagnostic Validity of Autism Measures Among Adults in an Outpatient Clinic Sample.在门诊样本中检验成人自闭症测量方法的诊断效度。
Autism Adulthood. 2019 Mar 1;1(1):60-68. doi: 10.1089/aut.2018.0023. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
8
Development and Validation of Objective and Quantitative Eye Tracking-Based Measures of Autism Risk and Symptom Levels.自闭症风险和症状水平的基于客观和定量眼动追踪的测量方法的开发和验证。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018 Nov;57(11):858-866. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2018.06.023. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
9
ADOS-Eye-Tracking: The Archimedean Point of View and Its Absence in Autism Spectrum Conditions.《孤独症谱系障碍中的阿基米德点视角及其缺失:ADOS 眼动追踪研究》
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 18;12:584537. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.584537. eCollection 2021.
10
Different Eye Tracking Patterns in Autism Spectrum Disorder in Toddler and Preschool Children.幼儿和学龄前儿童自闭症谱系障碍中的不同眼动追踪模式
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 9;13:899521. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.899521. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Identifying Autism Gaze Patterns in Five-Second Data Records.在五秒数据记录中识别自闭症注视模式。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 May 18;14(10):1047. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14101047.
2
Different Eye Tracking Patterns in Autism Spectrum Disorder in Toddler and Preschool Children.幼儿和学龄前儿童自闭症谱系障碍中的不同眼动追踪模式
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 9;13:899521. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.899521. eCollection 2022.
3
The cerebellum is linked to theory of mind alterations in autism. A direct clinical and MRI comparison between individuals with autism and cerebellar neurodegenerative pathologies.
小脑与自闭症的心理理论改变有关。自闭症患者与小脑神经退行性病变个体的直接临床和 MRI 比较。
Autism Res. 2021 Nov;14(11):2300-2313. doi: 10.1002/aur.2593. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
4
Eye-Tracking in Infants and Young Children at Risk for Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review of Visual Stimuli in Experimental Paradigms.眼动追踪在自闭症谱系障碍风险婴儿和幼儿中的应用:实验范式中视觉刺激的系统评价。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2021 Aug;51(8):2578-2599. doi: 10.1007/s10803-020-04731-w.
5
Regulation of autism-relevant behaviors by cerebellar-prefrontal cortical circuits.小脑-前额叶皮质回路对自闭症相关行为的调节。
Nat Neurosci. 2020 Sep;23(9):1102-1110. doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-0665-z. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
6
Deep learning of spontaneous arousal fluctuations detects early cholinergic defects across neurodevelopmental mouse models and patients.深度学习自发性觉醒波动可在神经发育的小鼠模型和患者中检测到早期胆碱能缺陷。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 22;117(38):23298-23303. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820847116. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
7
Caregiver Voices: Cross-Cultural Input on Improving Access to Autism Services.照顾者之声:改善自闭症服务获取途径的跨文化投入。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2019 Aug;6(4):752-773. doi: 10.1007/s40615-019-00575-y. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
8
Development and Validation of Objective and Quantitative Eye Tracking-Based Measures of Autism Risk and Symptom Levels.自闭症风险和症状水平的基于客观和定量眼动追踪的测量方法的开发和验证。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018 Nov;57(11):858-866. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2018.06.023. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
9
Applying Eye Tracking to Identify Autism Spectrum Disorder in Children.应用眼动追踪技术识别儿童自闭症谱系障碍。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2019 Jan;49(1):209-215. doi: 10.1007/s10803-018-3690-y.
10
Autism spectrum disorder: advances in diagnosis and evaluation.自闭症谱系障碍:诊断与评估的新进展。
BMJ. 2018 May 21;361:k1674. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k1674.