Logan H, Astrup T F, Damgaard A
Department of Environmental and Resource Engineering Technical University of Denmark Lyngby Denmark.
Department of Green Chemistry and Technology University of Ghent Ghent Belgium.
J Ind Ecol. 2024 Dec;28(6):1582-1597. doi: 10.1111/jiec.13542. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
As the European Union transitions to the circular use of plastics, robust life cycle assessments are crucial in understanding and preparing for this new economy. Additives are essential to the production of all plastics but were reported as missing from life cycle assessments (LCAs) of plastic materials a decade ago. This study expands upon previous research by investigating if plastic additive impacts are now included in LCAs of recycled plastic materials or if they are still absent. In part I, we conduct a systematic literature review of 93 LCAs on plastics, including mechanical recycling pathways, and distinguish if plastic additive impacts are considered in (i) in-text discussions and (ii) the life cycle inventories (LCIs) of each study. We then compare the types of additive inclusion within the corpus to ascertain whether author knowledge or data availability dictates additive inclusion in plastic LCAs. We find that data disclosure and detailed discussions of specific additive impacts are missing across the corpus due to poor transparency in LCI disclosure or overly generic disclosures of additives. The lack of detailed and transparent discussions and disclosure indicates that additive impacts are missing from LCAs of recycled plastic materials, leading to incomplete analyses of their impacts. Until addressed, such a gap may lead to inaccurate or incomplete circular plastic material LCAs. In part II, we assess the quality of generic disclosures and explore how database quality and transparency have contributed to additive omissions in LCAs.
随着欧盟向塑料的循环利用转型,全面的生命周期评估对于理解和应对这种新经济至关重要。添加剂对所有塑料的生产都至关重要,但十年前有报告称其在塑料材料的生命周期评估(LCA)中缺失。本研究通过调查塑料添加剂的影响现在是否被纳入再生塑料材料的LCA中,或者它们是否仍然缺失,对先前的研究进行了拓展。在第一部分中,我们对93项关于塑料的LCA进行了系统的文献综述,包括机械回收途径,并区分在(i)文中讨论和(ii)每项研究的生命周期清单(LCI)中是否考虑了塑料添加剂的影响。然后,我们比较了语料库中添加剂纳入的类型,以确定是作者的知识还是数据可用性决定了塑料LCA中添加剂的纳入情况。我们发现,由于LCI披露的透明度低或添加剂的披露过于笼统,整个语料库都缺少数据披露和对特定添加剂影响的详细讨论。缺乏详细和透明的讨论与披露表明,再生塑料材料的LCA中缺少添加剂的影响,导致对其影响的分析不完整。在这个问题得到解决之前,这样的差距可能会导致循环塑料材料LCA的不准确或不完整。在第二部分中,我们评估了一般性披露的质量,并探讨了数据库质量和透明度如何导致了LCA中添加剂的遗漏。