Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Princetonlaan 8, 3584 CB Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Princetonlaan 8, 3584 CB Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Waste Manag. 2021 Feb 15;121:331-342. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.12.020. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
To ensure a circular economy for plastics, insights in the environmental impacts of recycling and optimal recycling choices for specific plastic polymers are crucial. This was obtained by determining the environmental performance of 10 selected recycling technologies with varying TRL levels, using the chemical properties of the top 25 produced polymers in Europe. The results were collected in a life cycle assessment (LCA) 'matrix' model. To simulate realistic plastic recycling challenges, case studies of PE/PP foils from municipal waste and ABS plastic with brominated flame retardants were developed, to be used as an addition to the LCA matrix model results. Potential emission reduction was assessed by combining LCA matrix outcomes with European polymer demand data. The LCA matrix model illustrates that potential environmental performance of recycling technologies varied strongly per polymer type and did not always follow the state-of-the-art recycling hierarchy. Commodity plastics performed well with tertiary recycling technologies, such as gasification and pyrolysis to monomers; secondary mechanical recycling was outperformed. A focus on primary recycling is environmentally beneficial for most engineering and high performance plastics. To enhance the performance of primary recycling technologies, a higher purity and improved sorting is required. As demonstrated in the case studies, low sorting efficiencies due to impurities reduces positive environmental impacts. Hence, optimal environmental performance of recycling is obtained where pre-treatment (sorting, cleaning) is adapted to the recycling technology. According to the model, recycling the 15 most demanded polymers in Europe reduces CO emissions from plastics by 73% or 200 Mtonne CO eq.
为了确保塑料的循环经济,了解回收的环境影响以及针对特定塑料聚合物的最佳回收选择至关重要。这是通过确定具有不同 TRL 水平的 10 种选定回收技术的环境性能来实现的,使用了欧洲产量最高的 25 种聚合物的化学性质。结果收集在生命周期评估 (LCA)“矩阵”模型中。为了模拟现实的塑料回收挑战,开发了来自城市废物的 PE/PP 箔和含溴阻燃剂的 ABS 塑料的案例研究,以作为 LCA 矩阵模型结果的补充。通过将 LCA 矩阵结果与欧洲聚合物需求数据相结合,评估了潜在的减排量。LCA 矩阵模型表明,回收技术的潜在环境性能因聚合物类型而异,并不总是遵循现有的回收层次结构。对于商品塑料,采用三级回收技术(如气化和热解成单体)效果良好;二级机械回收则表现不佳。对于大多数工程塑料和高性能塑料来说,专注于初级回收在环境上是有益的。为了提高初级回收技术的性能,需要提高纯度和改进分类。如案例研究所示,由于杂质导致的分类效率低下会降低积极的环境影响。因此,只有在预处理(分类、清洁)适应回收技术的情况下,才能实现回收的最佳环境性能。根据该模型,回收欧洲需求量最大的 15 种聚合物可将塑料的 CO 排放量减少 73%或 200 百万吨 CO eq。