De Antonio-Cuscó Marta, Sorlí Luisa, Muñoz-Bermúdez Rosana, López-Mula Carlos, Parrilla Francisco José, Gracia-Arnillas Maria Pilar, Prim Núria, Campillo Ambrós Núria, Horcajada Juan P, Masclans-Enviz Joan Ramon, Grau Santiago, Luque Sònia
Pharmacy Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2025 Feb 3;80(2):554-562. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkae444.
To describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) of linezolid in plasma and pleural fluid (PF) in critically ill patients with proven or suspected Gram-positive bacterial infections.
Observational PK study in 14 critically ill patients treated with linezolid at standard doses. Blood and PF samples were collected and analysed by HPLC. The ratio between PF and plasma concentrations was calculated. The PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) target of linezolid in plasma was defined as 100% of the duration of the dosing interval in which concentrations were above the MIC (%100 T > MIC).
The median (5th and 95th percentiles) linezolid concentration values for plasma pre-dose at steady state (Cmin,ss) and at the end of the 1-h infusion at steady state (Cmax,ss) were 1.1 (0.02-28.3) and 13.8 mg/L (2.9-38.1), respectively, and the PF pre-dose concentration (PF0 h) and PF concentration at the end of the 1-h intravenous infusion (PF1 h) were 2.8 (0.1-31.6) and 4.2 mg/L (0.1-45.2), respectively. At both times (pre-dose and post-infusion), a strong positive correlation was observed between PF and plasma linezolid concentrations (Spearman's rho coefficients = 0.8 and 0.9, with P < 0.001 for both). The defined PK/PD target in plasma was achieved in 8 (57.1%), 4 (28.6%) and 3 (21.4%) patients assuming an MIC of 1, 2 and 4 mg/L, respectively.
Linezolid seems to penetrate well into the PF, with concentrations exceeding those in plasma. However, high inter-individual variability, both in plasma and PF concentrations, was observed. A high proportion of patients did not achieve the PK/PD target in plasma, especially in the presence of high MIC strains.
描述利奈唑胺在确诊或疑似革兰氏阳性菌感染的重症患者血浆和胸腔积液(PF)中的药代动力学(PK)情况。
对14例接受标准剂量利奈唑胺治疗的重症患者进行观察性PK研究。采集血液和PF样本,采用高效液相色谱法进行分析。计算PF与血浆浓度之比。利奈唑胺在血浆中的PK/药效学(PD)目标定义为给药间隔期间浓度高于最低抑菌浓度(MIC)的持续时间占比(%100 T>MIC)。
稳态下给药前血浆(Cmin,ss)和稳态下1小时输注结束时血浆(Cmax,ss)的利奈唑胺浓度中位数(第5和第95百分位数)分别为1.1(0.02 - 28.3)和13.8 mg/L(2.9 - 38.1),给药前PF浓度(PF0 h)和1小时静脉输注结束时PF浓度(PF1 h)分别为2.8(0.1 - 31.6)和4.2 mg/L(0.1 - 出45.2)。在两个时间点(给药前和输注后),均观察到PF与血浆利奈唑胺浓度之间存在强正相关(Spearman秩相关系数分别为0.8和0.9,两者P均<0.001)。假设MIC为1、2和4 mg/L,分别有8例(57.1%)、4例(28.6%)和3例(21.4%)患者达到了血浆中定义的PK/PD目标。
利奈唑胺似乎能很好地渗透到PF中,其浓度超过血浆浓度。然而,观察到血浆和PF浓度均存在较高的个体间变异性。相当一部分患者未达到血浆中的PK/PD目标。,特别是在存在高MIC菌株的情况下。