Wu Xiaofei, Tang Yan, Zhang Xiaohua, Wu Chenchen, Kong Lingti
Department of Emergency Internal Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233004, People's Republic of China.
Department of Endocrinology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233004, People's Republic of China.
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2018 Jun 11;12:1679-1684. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S168757. eCollection 2018.
We investigated the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters of linezolid in patients who had suffered cerebral hemorrhage after lateral ventricular drainage.
Ten patients with cerebral hemorrhage after lateral ventricular drainage with stroke-associated pneumonia who were given linezolid were enrolled. Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were taken at appropriate intervals after the first administration of linezolid and assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Then, PK parameters were estimated, and a Monte Carlo simulation was used to calculate the probability of target attainments (PTAs) for linezolid achieving the PK/PD index at different minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs).
The maximum concentration of linezolid in plasma and CSF was reached at 1.00 h and 3.10 h, respectively. The average penetration of linezolid in CSF was 56.81%. If the area under the plasma concentration vs time curve from zero to the final sampling time (AUC)/MIC ≥ 59.1 was applied as a parameter, the PTA of linezolid in plasma could provide good coverage (PTA ≥ 90%) only for pathogens with a MIC of ≤2 μg/mL, whereas it could be achieved in CSF with a MIC of ≤1 μg/mL. If %T > MIC ≥ 40% was applied as a parameter, the PTA of linezolid in plasma/CSF could provide good coverage if the MIC was ≤4 μg/mL.
For patients with infection of the central nervous system and who are sensitive to the drug, the usual dosing regimens of linezolid can achieve a good therapeutic effect. However, for critically ill or drug-resistant patients, an increase in dose, the frequency of administration, or longer infusion may be needed to improve the curative effect.
我们研究了利奈唑胺在侧脑室引流术后脑出血患者中的药代动力学(PK)和药效学(PD)参数。
纳入10例侧脑室引流术后脑出血合并卒中相关性肺炎并接受利奈唑胺治疗的患者。在首次给予利奈唑胺后的适当时间间隔采集血浆和脑脊液(CSF)样本,采用高效液相色谱法(HPLC)进行检测。然后,估算PK参数,并使用蒙特卡洛模拟计算利奈唑胺在不同最低抑菌浓度(MIC)下达到PK/PD指数的达标概率(PTA)。
利奈唑胺在血浆和CSF中的最大浓度分别在1.00小时和3.10小时达到。利奈唑胺在CSF中的平均渗透率为56.81%。如果将从零至最后采样时间的血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)/MIC≥59.1作为参数,利奈唑胺在血浆中的PTA仅能为MIC≤2μg/mL的病原体提供良好覆盖(PTA≥90%),而对于MIC≤1μg/mL的病原体,在CSF中可实现良好覆盖。如果将%T>MIC≥40%作为参数,当MIC≤4μg/mL时,利奈唑胺在血浆/CSF中的PTA可提供良好覆盖。
对于中枢神经系统感染且对该药物敏感的患者,利奈唑胺的常规给药方案可取得良好治疗效果。然而,对于重症或耐药患者,可能需要增加剂量、给药频率或延长输注时间以提高疗效。