Carls-Diamante Sidney, Atanasova Nina
Zukunftskolleg, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, 78464, Germany.
Centre of Philosophy, School of Arts and Humanities/Faculdade de Letras, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, 1600-214, Portugal.
Eur J Neurosci. 2025 Jan;61(1):e16640. doi: 10.1111/ejn.16640.
This paper uses suicidality in bipolar disorder (BD) to illustrate that multidimensional frameworks account for complex phenomena with cognitive, psychological, socioenvironmental and physiological components better than their reductionist counterparts. We challenge level-based reductionist models that regard a particular dimension as fundamental. To comprehensively understand complex psychiatric phenomena, multidimensional models that acknowledge the heterogeneity of aetiological factors, rather than homogenising them under a single dimension, must be utilised. Multidimensional models allow a better understanding of the individual context under which a psychiatric phenomenon arises, and the interrelationships between its different aetiological dimensions. Suicidality in BD is used as a case study because it particularly highlights the interplay between biological, psychological, sociocultural and experiential factors. The multidimensional nature of suicidality is reflected by the heterogeneous strategies by which it is managed. Although similar to suicidality in other contexts, in BD suicidality has distinctive structural characteristics that emphasise its multidimensionality. Consequently, investigating suicidality in BD yields claims generalisable to suicidality as a whole alongside novel insights on BD-specific features. For instance, suicidality in BD has physiological causal factors, e.g., genetic predisposition and aggravation by symptomatic periods. However, its other features underscore the causal roles of cognitions. In persons with BD, suicidality can persist beyond depression and is sometimes experienced during mania, possibly due to suicidal ideation persisting beyond symptomatic periods. This indicates the need to account for cognitive or psychological causal factors. Models of suicidality in BD typically adopt a non-level-based, non-reductionist approach, reflected in the diverse clinical strategies for managing suicidality in BD.
本文以双相情感障碍(BD)中的自杀行为为例,说明多维框架比还原论框架能更好地解释具有认知、心理、社会环境和生理成分的复杂现象。我们对将某一特定维度视为基础的基于层次的还原论模型提出质疑。为了全面理解复杂的精神现象,必须采用承认病因因素异质性的多维模型,而不是将它们统一在单一维度之下。多维模型有助于更好地理解精神现象产生的个体背景,以及其不同病因维度之间的相互关系。BD中的自杀行为被用作案例研究,因为它特别突出了生物、心理、社会文化和经验因素之间的相互作用。自杀行为的管理策略多种多样,这反映了其多维性质。虽然BD中的自杀行为与其他情况下的自杀行为相似,但它具有独特的结构特征,强调了其多维性。因此,对BD中的自杀行为进行研究,不仅能得出适用于整体自杀行为的结论,还能获得关于BD特有特征的新见解。例如,BD中的自杀行为有生理因果因素,如遗传易感性和症状发作期的加重。然而,其其他特征强调了认知的因果作用。在BD患者中,自杀行为可能在抑郁期之后持续存在,有时在躁狂期也会出现,这可能是由于自杀念头在症状发作期之后仍持续存在。这表明需要考虑认知或心理因果因素。BD中自杀行为的模型通常采用非基于层次、非还原论的方法,这体现在管理BD中自杀行为的多种临床策略中。