Etxaniz-Oses José, Maldonado-Martín Sara, Zorrilla Inaki, Gorostegi-Anduaga Ilargi, Apodaca-Arrizabalaga Maria J, González-Pinto Ana
GIzartea, Kirola eta Ariketa Fisikoa Ikerkuntza Taldea (GIKAFIT), Society, Sports, and Exercise Research Group, Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Education and Sport-Physical Activity and Sport Sciences Section, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Lasarte kalea, 71, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Araba/Álava, Basque Country, Spain.
Bioaraba Health Research Institute, Physical Activity, Exercise, and Health Research Group, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain.
Brain Behav. 2025 Feb;15(2):e70297. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70297.
Bipolar disorder (BD) is associated with considerable morbidity and premature mortality, mainly due to somatic causes. This study aims to determine some physical, exercise capacity-related physiological variables and biochemical markers of health status in adults (45.4 ± 13.1 years) with BD (n = 65) compared to a healthy control (HC) population (n = 29) sample and to estimate cardiovascular risk (CVR) through different methods in the BD group.
Multiple assessments included body composition, cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), and biochemical parameters. CVR was calculated using the Framingham Heart Study, SCORE2, and relative risk methods.
The BD population, compared to the HC, showed unfavorable body composition (waist-to-hip ratio, 0.9 ± 0.1 vs. 0.8 ± 0.1; fat body mass, 33.3 ± 10.2 vs. 24.3 ± 8.9%, p ≤ 0.001), CRF (peak oxygen uptake, 25.2 ± 8.2 vs. 33.4 ± 8.7 mL kg min; and cardiorespiratory optimal point, 27.9 ± 4.2 vs. 23.6 ± 4.2 ventilation/oxygen uptake ratio, p ≤ 0.05), biochemical concentrations of atherogenic indexes (total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio, 4.1 ± 1.5 vs. 3.3 ± 1.0; and triglycerides/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio, 2.8 ± 2.3 vs. 1.5 ± 1.0, p ≤ 0.05), and inflammatory C-reactive protein (3.8 ± 10.2 vs. 0.9 ± 1.05 mg/dL, p ≤ 0.05). Consequently, CVR showed higher values (p ≤ 0.05) in BD (high risk, 3.1%) compared to HC (low-to-moderate risk, 2.2%) participants, according to SCORE2, higher (p ≤ 0.05) vascular age (49.8 years) than chronological age (45.8 years), with a significant difference (p = 0.005) compared to HC.
This study highlights the importance of specific physical, biochemical, and physiological screening and CVR and vascular age assessment for people with BD. The practical application of these findings would prevent cardiovascular disease in BD and promote a healthier lifestyle as an adjuvant strategy to pharmacological intervention.
双相情感障碍(BD)与相当高的发病率和过早死亡率相关,主要是由于躯体原因。本研究旨在确定患有双相情感障碍(n = 65)的成年人(45.4 ± 13.1岁)与健康对照(HC)人群(n = 29)样本相比,一些与身体、运动能力相关的生理变量以及健康状况的生化标志物,并通过不同方法评估双相情感障碍组的心血管风险(CVR)。
多项评估包括身体成分、心肺适能(CRF)和生化参数。使用弗雷明汉心脏研究、SCORE2和相对风险方法计算CVR。
与健康对照相比,双相情感障碍人群的身体成分不佳(腰臀比,0.9 ± 0.1对0.8 ± 0.1;脂肪量,33.3 ± 10.2对24.3 ± 8.9%,p≤0.001)、心肺适能(峰值摄氧量,25.2 ± 8.2对33.4 ± 8.7 mL·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹;心肺最佳点,27.9 ± 4.2对23.6 ± 4.2通气/摄氧比,p≤0.05)、致动脉粥样硬化指数的生化浓度(总胆固醇/高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值,4.1 ± 1.5对3.3 ± 1.0;甘油三酯/高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值,2.8 ± 2.3对1.5 ± 1.0,p≤0.05)以及炎症性C反应蛋白(3.8 ± 10.2对0.9 ± 1.05 mg/dL,p≤0.05)。因此,根据SCORE2,双相情感障碍患者的CVR值更高(p≤0.05)(高风险,3.1%),相比之下健康对照参与者为低至中度风险(2.2%),双相情感障碍患者的血管年龄(49.8岁)高于实际年龄(45.8岁)(p≤0.05),与健康对照相比有显著差异(p = 0.005)。
本研究强调了对双相情感障碍患者进行特定的身体、生化和生理筛查以及CVR和血管年龄评估的重要性。这些研究结果的实际应用将预防双相情感障碍患者的心血管疾病,并促进更健康的生活方式,作为药物干预的辅助策略。