Suppr超能文献

常温机械灌注改变肝移植物流:临床影响与成本

Transforming the logistics of liver transplantation with normothermic machine perfusion: Clinical impact versus cost.

作者信息

Gao Qimeng, Alderete Isaac S, Aykun Nihal, Samy Kannan P, Nauser Christopher L, Raigani Siavash, DeLaura Isabel F, Kahan Riley, Anwar Imran J, Abraham Nader, Dunkman W Jonathan, Miller Timothy E, King Lindsay Y, Berg Carl L, Vikraman Deepak S, Ravindra Kadiyala, Rege Aparna S, Collins Bradley H, McElroy Lisa M, Jamieson Ian, Knechtle Stuart J, Sudan Debra L, Barbas Andrew S

机构信息

Departments of Surgery, Anesthesia, and Medicine, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Liver Transpl. 2025 Jun 1;31(6):750-761. doi: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000560. Epub 2024 Dec 25.

Abstract

Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) facilitates the utilization of marginal liver allografts. It remains unknown whether clinical benefits offset additional costs in the real-world setting. We performed a comparison of outcomes and hospitalization costs for donor livers preserved by NMP versus static cold storage at a high-volume center. Adult patients receiving deceased donor liver transplants preserved by either NMP (TransMedics Organ Care System) or static cold storage between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2023, were included. Donor and recipient characteristics, operative parameters, post-transplant outcomes, and hospitalization costs were compared. A total of 144 NMP and 149 static cold storage cases were included. A higher proportion of NMP cases were donation after circulatory death (38.2% vs. 4.7%, p <0.001). Despite a significantly higher Liver Donor Risk Index (2.1 vs. 1.7, p <0.001) and longer preservation time (877 vs. 355 min, p <0.001), recipients of NMP experienced lower rates of reperfusion syndrome (4.3% vs. 32.9%, p <0.001), less blood loss (1.5 vs. 3.0 L, p <0.001), and required less blood product transfusion. This resulted in shorter operative time for NMP cases (357 vs. 438 min, p <0.001) and significant reductions in both intensive care unit (3 vs. 5 d, p =0.005) and hospital length of stay (11 vs. 13 d, p =0.03). NMP facilitated the transition of cases to daytime hours (88.9% vs. 46.3%, p <0.001). Despite the clinical and logistical benefits observed, index hospitalization costs were significantly higher in the NMP cohort ($256,810 vs. $209,144, p <0.001), driven largely by higher organ acquisition costs ($135,930 vs. $50,940, p <0.001). In conclusion, utilization of NMP comes with an attendant increase in cost but provides substantial clinical benefit. Transplant programs must weigh these considerations in their practice environments before initiating an NMP program.

摘要

常温机器灌注(NMP)有助于边缘性肝脏同种异体移植物的利用。在现实环境中,临床益处是否能抵消额外成本仍不清楚。我们在一个大容量中心对采用NMP保存的供肝与静态冷藏保存的供肝的结局和住院费用进行了比较。纳入了2021年1月1日至2023年12月31日期间接受已故供体肝脏移植的成年患者,这些患者的供肝采用NMP(TransMedics器官护理系统)或静态冷藏保存。比较了供体和受体特征、手术参数、移植后结局及住院费用。共纳入144例NMP病例和149例静态冷藏病例。NMP病例中循环死亡后捐献的比例更高(38.2%对4.7%,p<0.001)。尽管NMP组的肝脏供体风险指数显著更高(2.1对1.7,p<0.001)且保存时间更长(877对355分钟,p<0.001),但NMP组的受者再灌注综合征发生率更低(4.3%对32.9%,p<0.001),失血量更少(1.5对3.0升,p<0.001),且所需血液制品输注量更少。这使得NMP病例的手术时间更短(357对438分钟,p<0.001),重症监护病房住院时间(3对5天,p=0.005)和住院总时长(11对13天,p=0.03)均显著缩短。NMP有助于手术安排至日间时段(88.9%对46.3%,p<0.001)。尽管观察到了临床和后勤方面的益处,但NMP组的首次住院费用显著更高(256,810美元对209,144美元,p<0.001),这主要是由于器官获取成本更高(135,930美元对50,940美元,p<0.001)。总之,使用NMP会带来成本增加,但能提供显著的临床益处。移植项目在启动NMP项目之前,必须在其实际工作环境中权衡这些因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验