Suppr超能文献

3个月大婴儿的图形视觉诱发电位与优先注视行为的比较。

Comparison of pattern VEPs and preferential-looking behavior in 3-month-old infants.

作者信息

Sokol S, Moskowitz A

出版信息

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985 Mar;26(3):359-65.

PMID:3972516
Abstract

Studies of visual acuity in human infants between 1 and 6 months of age using the visual-evoked potential (VEP) and forced-choice preferential looking (FPL) have shown that acuity is one to two octaves higher by VEP estimates than by FPL estimates. In an attempt to study these differences, the authors obtained both VEP and FPL data from 26 3-month-old infants. VEP data were obtained with gratings of 0.31, 0.62, 1.25 and 2.50 cycles/deg, which were counterphase alternated at 2 Hz. FPL data were obtained for stationary gratings using either the method of constant stimuli or a staircase procedure. Our study revealed three major findings: (1) recordable VEPs can be obtained for spatial patterns that are below threshold by behavioral measures; (2) the use of different scoring criteria that yields comparable VEP and FPL group mean acuities does not yield a significant correlation between VEP amplitude acuity and FPL acuity for individual infants, probably because of the inherent "noise" in each technique; and (3) when VEP latency rather than amplitude is used to estimate acuity, there is a significant correlation between electrophysiology and behavior.

摘要

利用视觉诱发电位(VEP)和强迫选择优先注视法(FPL)对1至6个月大的人类婴儿进行的视敏度研究表明,通过VEP估计得出的视敏度比通过FPL估计得出的视敏度高1至2个八度。为了研究这些差异,作者从26名3个月大的婴儿身上获取了VEP和FPL数据。VEP数据是使用0.31、0.62、1.25和2.50周/度的光栅获得的,这些光栅以2Hz的频率进行反相交替。FPL数据是使用恒定刺激法或阶梯法对静止光栅获得的。我们的研究揭示了三个主要发现:(1)对于行为测量低于阈值的空间模式,可以获得可记录的VEP;(2)使用不同的评分标准得出可比的VEP和FPL组平均视敏度,但对于个体婴儿,VEP振幅视敏度和FPL视敏度之间没有显著相关性,这可能是因为每种技术中固有的“噪声”;(3)当使用VEP潜伏期而非振幅来估计视敏度时,电生理学和行为之间存在显著相关性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验