• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

症状性狭窄行颈动脉内膜剥脱术后两年死亡率的风险评分

Risk score for two-year mortality following carotid endarterectomy performed for symptomatic stenosis.

作者信息

Blecha Matthew, Weise Lorela, Liu Amy, Yuan Karen, Terry Travis, Paraskevas Kosmas I

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Loyola University Health System, Maywood, IL.

Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Loyola University Health System, Maywood, IL.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2025 Apr;81(4):905-918.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.12.044. Epub 2024 Dec 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2024.12.044
PMID:39725245
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to identify variables at the time of clinical presentation that place patients at higher risk for mortality following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for symptomatic lesions. Further, this study will create a risk score for mortality within 2 years following CEA for symptomatic stenosis to help tailor future postoperative and long-term management by identifying patients who require heightened vigilance in postoperative care to facilitate survival.

METHODS

The Vascular Quality Initiative CEA module was queried for procedures performed for symptomatic (within 180 days) carotid bifurcation stenosis. After exclusions, 24,713 met study inclusion. Univariable analysis for the binary outcome of mortality within 2 years of surgery was performed with χ testing for categorical variables and Student t-test for ordinal variables. Multivariable binary logistic regression was then performed utilizing variables that achieved univariable significance (P < .05) for the outcome. Variables with a multivariable P value ≤ .05 were included in the risk score and weighted based on their respective regression beta-coefficient in a point scale. Variables with a beta-coefficient of less than .25 were assigned 1 point, and then a point was added for each rise in beta-coefficient at .25 intervals. The risk score was then tested utilizing 20,668 patients deemed to be of acceptable surgical risk who underwent carotid stenting for symptomatic disease in the Vascular Quality Initiative.

RESULTS

Variables that achieved multivariable significance (P<.05) towards the outcome of mortality within 2 years of symptomatic CEA that were included in the risk score were: home status within the top 20% of area deprivation index (most disadvantaged) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.20); female sex (aOR, 1.157); body mass index <20 kg/m (aOR, 1.49); any history of tobacco smoking (aOR, 1.39); coronary artery disease (aOR, 1.47); history of congestive heart failure (aOR, 1.47); chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (aOR, 1.45); baseline renal insufficiency (aOR, 1.46); end-stage renal disease dialysis status at presentation (aOR, 2.38); American Society of Anesthesiology class 4 operative risk designation (aOR, 1.33); diabetes mellitus (aOR, 1.16); anemia (aOR, 2.09); history of peripheral artery intervention (aOR, 1.20); history of major lower extremity amputation (aOR, 1.93); prior CEA or carotid stenting (aOR, 1.32); escalating preoperative modified Rankin score (aOR, 4.46); and escalating age (aOR, 1.04/year). A steep escalation was noted from 2-year mortality rates of <4% for patients with risk scores of ≤4 to >35% for patients with scores of ≥17. Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness of fit testing for the multivariable regression analysis revealed an overall accuracy of 93.1% for the model, with 99.9% accuracy in predicting survival. Model testing in the symptomatic carotid stenting cohort revealed excellent correlation with no statistical difference in the mortality rate at 16 of the 19 risk score data points and a near identical mortality escalation pattern with rising risk score. When applied to the validation cohort, the risk score had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.70 and a Hosmer-Lemeshow overall accuracy of 91.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

A risk score with quality accuracy in determining 2-year survival after CEA performed for symptomatic stenosis has been developed. Severity of preoperative stroke, dialysis status, baseline anemia, advancing age, low body weight, and cardiopulmonary comorbidities are the most deleterious variables negatively impacting survival. The score has utility in patient shared decision-making and expectation counseling.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定有症状性病变行颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)时的变量,这些变量会使患者术后死亡风险更高。此外,本研究将为有症状性狭窄行CEA术后2年内的死亡创建一个风险评分,通过识别术后护理中需要提高警惕以促进生存的患者,来帮助制定未来的术后及长期管理方案。

方法

查询血管质量改进计划CEA模块中针对有症状(180天内)颈动脉分叉狭窄所做的手术。排除后,24713例符合研究纳入标准。对手术2年内死亡这一二元结局进行单变量分析,分类变量采用χ检验,有序变量采用学生t检验。然后利用对结局具有单变量显著性(P <.05)的变量进行多变量二元逻辑回归。多变量P值≤.05的变量纳入风险评分,并根据其各自回归β系数在评分量表中进行加权。β系数小于.25的变量赋值1分,然后β系数每增加.25个单位就加1分。然后利用血管质量改进计划中20668例被认为手术风险可接受、因有症状疾病接受颈动脉支架置入术的患者对风险评分进行检验。

结果

纳入风险评分的、对有症状性CEA术后2年内死亡结局具有多变量显著性(P<.05)的变量有:处于地区贫困指数前20%(最贫困)的家庭状况(调整优势比[aOR],1.20);女性(aOR,1.157);体重指数<20kg/m²(aOR,1.49);任何吸烟史(aOR,1.39);冠状动脉疾病(aOR,1.47);充血性心力衰竭病史(aOR,1.47);慢性阻塞性肺疾病(aOR,1.45);基线肾功能不全(aOR,1.46);就诊时终末期肾病透析状态(aOR,2.38);美国麻醉医师协会4级手术风险分级(aOR,1.33);糖尿病(aOR,1.16);贫血(aOR,2.09);外周动脉介入史(aOR,1.20);主要下肢截肢史(aOR,1.93);既往CEA或颈动脉支架置入术(aOR,1.32);术前改良Rankin评分升高(aOR,4.46);年龄增长(aOR,每年1.04)。风险评分≤4分的患者2年死亡率<4%,而评分≥17分的患者2年死亡率>35%,两者之间有显著升高。多变量回归分析的Hosmer和Lemeshow拟合优度检验显示,该模型总体准确率为93.1%,预测生存的准确率为99.9%。有症状颈动脉支架置入队列中的模型检验显示,19个风险评分数据点中有16个的死亡率与模型有极好的相关性且无统计学差异,并且随着风险评分升高,死亡率升高模式几乎相同。应用于验证队列时,风险评分在受试者工作特征曲线下的面积为0.70,Hosmer-Lemeshow总体准确率为91.3%。

结论

已制定出一个在确定有症状性狭窄行CEA术后2年生存率方面具有高质量准确性的风险评分。术前卒中严重程度、透析状态、基线贫血、年龄增长、低体重以及心肺合并症是对生存产生负面影响最有害的变量。该评分在患者共同决策和预期咨询方面有实用价值。

相似文献

1
Risk score for two-year mortality following carotid endarterectomy performed for symptomatic stenosis.症状性狭窄行颈动脉内膜剥脱术后两年死亡率的风险评分
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Apr;81(4):905-918.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.12.044. Epub 2024 Dec 25.
2
Outcomes following carotid revascularization in patients with prior ipsilateral carotid artery stenting in the Vascular Quality Initiative.血管质量倡议中既往同侧颈动脉支架置入术后行颈动脉血运重建术的患者结局。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Dec;80(6):1705-1715.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.08.024. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
3
Risk factors for mortality within 5 years of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis.无症状性狭窄颈动脉内膜切除术 5 年内死亡的风险因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jun;75(6):1945-1957. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.01.020. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
4
Carotid endarterectomy and transcarotid artery revascularization can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease.颈动脉内膜切除术和经颈动脉血管重建术可在慢性肾脏病患者中以可接受的发病率和死亡率进行。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Aug;80(2):431-440. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.04.045. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
5
Risk factors contributing to 30-day and 1-year mortality event scores following major lower extremity amputation for limb ischemia.肢体缺血性疾病行主要下肢截肢术后30天和1年死亡事件评分的危险因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Jul;82(1):216-228.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.02.030. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
6
Preoperative Dependent Functional Status Is Associated With Poor Outcomes After Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Stenting in Both Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Patients.术前依赖性功能状态与症状性和无症状性患者颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术后的不良结局相关。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Oct;76:114-127. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.04.027. Epub 2021 May 15.
7
Anesthetic choice during transcarotid artery revascularization and carotid endarterectomy affects the risk of myocardial infarction.经颈动脉血管重建术和颈动脉内膜切除术期间的麻醉选择会影响心肌梗死风险。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Oct;74(4):1281-1289. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.03.037. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
8
Preoperative risk score for mortality within 3 years of visceral segment fenestrated endovascular aortic repair.内脏节段开窗血管内主动脉修复术后 3 年内死亡的术前风险评分。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Jul;80(1):32-44.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.03.012. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
9
The effect of preoperative smoking status on carotid endarterectomy outcomes in asymptomatic patients.术前吸烟状况对无症状患者颈动脉内膜切除术预后的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Mar;81(3):658-663. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.11.031. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
10
Carotid Endarterectomy With Simultaneous Proximal Common Carotid Endovascular Intervention is Beneficial for Symptomatic Stenosis and Likely Confers No Advantage for Asymptomatic Lesions.颈动脉内膜切除术联合近端颈总动脉血管内介入治疗对症状性狭窄有益,而对无症状病变可能没有优势。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2024 Apr;58(3):263-279. doi: 10.1177/15385744231207014. Epub 2023 Oct 17.