• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

紧急来袭:对英格兰地区家长和医生关于儿童因发热前往急诊科原因认知的定性调查

Coming in hot: a qualitative investigation into perceptions of parents and doctors of reasons for the presentation of children with fever to the emergency department in England.

作者信息

Franklin Courtney, Taylor-Robinson David, Carrol Enitan D, Moran Paul, Carter Bernie

机构信息

Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Liverpool, UK

Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Paediatr Open. 2024 Dec 24;8(1):e003039. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003039.

DOI:10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003039
PMID:39725453
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11683883/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Paediatric emergency department (ED) attendances and admissions in England are increasing. Fever is a common presenting problem for these attendances. Anxiety and misperceptions surrounding appropriate management of fever persist among parents. Little evidence exists on the pathways to ED for fever, and doctors' perceptions of why parents present their child to the ED.

OBJECTIVES

To understand perceptions of parents and doctors of the reasons for ED presentation for children (0-18 years) with fever in England.

DESIGN

This forms the first part of a qualitative study, using reflective thematic analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

15 parents (12 mothers and 3 fathers) who had taken their febrile child to hospital (2015-2023), and 5 ED doctors (4 consultants and 1 resident doctor) who had experienced treating a febrile child in an ED in England.

METHODS

Semistructured remote (Zoom) interviews were conducted (2022-2023).

RESULTS

Reflexive thematic analysis facilitated investigation into current parental concerns regarding fever and decision-making leading to ED attendance. The overarching theme 'factors influencing unscheduled care' comprised four key themes that reflected the complex interplay between factors influencing parental decision-making to seek emergency care, at the individual and wider structural level. These were parental proficiency and experience; social networks and access to services; fever phobia, uncertainty and anxiety; and reassurance. Doctors also acknowledged the importance of these factors, such as reassurance and showing compassion and further indicated a persistent educational gap surrounding fever between doctors and parents.

CONCLUSIONS

We widen the evidence base of why parents attend ED for paediatric fever and their perceptions of other health services. Parents face challenges when seeking care and perceived ED as a last resort. Interventions to support parental decision-making and management of fever could help to alleviate these challenges, as well as potentially reducing the demand for emergency care.

摘要

引言

英格兰儿科急诊科的就诊人数和住院人数正在增加。发热是这些就诊病例中常见的症状。家长们对发热的适当处理仍存在焦虑和误解。关于因发热前往急诊科的途径以及医生对家长送孩子去急诊科原因的看法,几乎没有相关证据。

目的

了解英格兰0至18岁发热儿童家长和医生对前往急诊科就诊原因的看法。

设计

这是一项定性研究的第一部分,采用反思性主题分析。

参与者

15名在2015年至2023年间带发热孩子去医院的家长(12名母亲和3名父亲),以及5名在英格兰急诊科有治疗发热儿童经验的急诊科医生(4名顾问医生和1名住院医生)。

方法

在2022年至2023年期间进行了半结构化远程(Zoom)访谈。

结果

反思性主题分析有助于调查当前家长对发热的担忧以及导致前往急诊科就诊的决策过程。总体主题“影响非预约护理的因素”包括四个关键主题,反映了在个体和更广泛的结构层面上影响家长寻求紧急护理决策的因素之间的复杂相互作用。这些主题是家长的知识水平和经验;社交网络和服务可及性;发热恐惧症、不确定性和焦虑;以及安心感。医生也认识到这些因素的重要性,比如安心感和表现出同情心,并进一步指出医生和家长在发热问题上存在持续的教育差距。

结论

我们拓宽了关于家长因儿科发热前往急诊科的原因及其对其他医疗服务看法的证据基础。家长在寻求护理时面临挑战,并将急诊科视为最后的求助途径。支持家长进行发热决策和管理的干预措施有助于缓解这些挑战,并有可能减少对紧急护理的需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe84/11683883/f155be0ed741/bmjpo-8-1-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe84/11683883/61390bab254b/bmjpo-8-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe84/11683883/12e6aca85ad2/bmjpo-8-1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe84/11683883/f155be0ed741/bmjpo-8-1-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe84/11683883/61390bab254b/bmjpo-8-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe84/11683883/12e6aca85ad2/bmjpo-8-1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe84/11683883/f155be0ed741/bmjpo-8-1-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Coming in hot: a qualitative investigation into perceptions of parents and doctors of reasons for the presentation of children with fever to the emergency department in England.紧急来袭:对英格兰地区家长和医生关于儿童因发热前往急诊科原因认知的定性调查
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2024 Dec 24;8(1):e003039. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003039.
2
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
The risks, benefits, and resource implications of different diets in gastrostomy-fed children: The YourTube mixed method study.胃造口喂养儿童不同饮食的风险、益处及资源影响:YouTube混合方法研究
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(25):1-21. doi: 10.3310/RRREF7741.
5
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
6
Factors that influence caregivers' and adolescents' views and practices regarding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for adolescents: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响照顾者和青少年对青少年人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种的看法及做法的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 15;4(4):CD013430. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013430.pub2.
7
A qualitative systematic review of the reasons for parental attendance at the emergency department with children presenting with minor illness.一项关于父母带患小病儿童前往急诊科就诊原因的定性系统评价。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2018 Jan;36:56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
8
Neonatal Nurses' Understanding of the Factors That Enhance and Hinder Early Communication Between Preterm Infants and Their Parents: A Narrative Inquiry Study.新生儿护士对促进和阻碍早产儿与其父母早期沟通因素的理解:一项叙事探究研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;60(4):e70093. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70093.
9
Getting to the bottom of why children with spina bifida use the emergency department: A qualitative analysis of parent and stakeholder perspectives.深入探究脊髓脊膜膨出患儿频繁使用急诊的原因:基于家长和利益相关者观点的定性分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2024 Aug;20(4):743.e1-743.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.05.007. Epub 2024 May 16.
10
Optimising the delivery and impacts of interventions to improve hospital doctors' workplace wellbeing in the NHS: The Care Under Pressure 3 realist evaluation study.优化干预措施的实施与影响,以改善英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)中医院医生的工作场所幸福感:“压力下的护理3”现实主义评价研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Aug;13(30):1-35. doi: 10.3310/PASQ1155.

引用本文的文献

1
Parental Perceptions of Pediatric Fever From Two Medical Centers in Lebanon.黎巴嫩两个医疗中心的家长对小儿发热的看法。
Int J Pediatr. 2025 Jul 24;2025:1336810. doi: 10.1155/ijpe/1336810. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
The non-clinical burden of febrile seizures: a systematic review.热性惊厥的非临床负担:一项系统综述
Front Pediatr. 2024 Apr 22;12:1377939. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1377939. eCollection 2024.
2
Shifting Perspectives: A Qualitative Study to Understand Family Expectations at the Time of Their Child's Admission.转变视角:一项旨在了解孩子入院时家庭期望的定性研究
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2023 Jan 17;10(1):13-20. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1947. eCollection 2023 Winter.
3
First-time parents' experiences related to parental self-efficacy: A scoping review.
新手父母与父母自我效能感相关的体验:范围综述。
Res Nurs Health. 2023 Feb;46(1):101-112. doi: 10.1002/nur.22285. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
4
Working with parents of children with complex mental health issues to improve care: A qualitative inquiry.与有复杂心理健康问题的儿童的父母合作以改善照护:一项定性研究。
J Child Health Care. 2022 Dec;26(4):548-567. doi: 10.1177/13674935211028694. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
5
Management of non-urgent paediatric emergency department attendances by GPs: a retrospective observational study.家庭医生对非紧急儿科就诊的管理:一项回顾性观察研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Dec 28;71(702):e22-e30. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X713885. Print 2021 Jan.
6
The influence of personal communities in understanding avoidable emergency department attendance: qualitative study.理解可避免急诊就诊的个人社区影响:定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Sep 21;20(1):887. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05705-5.
7
A systematic review of the organizational, environmental, professional and child and family factors influencing the timing of admission to hospital for children with serious infectious illness.系统评价组织、环境、专业和儿童及家庭因素对严重传染性疾病患儿住院时间的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 23;15(7):e0236013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236013. eCollection 2020.
8
Factors that influence family and parental preferences and decision making for unscheduled paediatric healthcare - systematic review.影响非计划性儿科医疗保健的家庭和父母偏好及决策的因素——系统综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 17;20(1):663. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05527-5.
9
What matters when managing childhood fever in the emergency department? A discrete-choice experiment comparing the preferences of parents and healthcare professionals in the UK.在急诊科管理儿童发热时,什么最重要?一项英国父母和医疗保健专业人员偏好的离散选择实验比较。
Arch Dis Child. 2020 Aug;105(8):765-771. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-318209. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
10
Parents' experiences and information needs related to childhood fever: A systematic review.父母在儿童发热方面的经历和信息需求:系统评价。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Apr;103(4):750-763. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.10.004. Epub 2019 Oct 9.