• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

积极的一面:大语言模型可以帮助主任们通过患者自己的话语来评估项目。

A positive spin: large language models can help directors evaluate programs through their patients' own words.

作者信息

Flaherty Leah Russell, Oliver Kendra H

机构信息

Allegheny Health Network, Psychiatry and Behavioral Health Instiute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Responsible Data Science, Office of the Provost, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Pain Rep. 2024 Dec 24;10(1):e1219. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001219. eCollection 2025 Feb.

DOI:10.1097/PR9.0000000000001219
PMID:39726852
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11671080/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Interpretation and utilization of qualitative feedback from participants has immense value for program evaluation. Reliance on only quantitative data runs the risk of losing the lived patient experience, forcing their outcomes to fit into our predefined objectives.

OBJECTIVES

Using large language models (LLMs), program directors may begin to employ rich, qualitative feedback expediently.

METHODS

This study provides an example of the feasibility of evaluating patient responses (n = 82) to Empowered Relief, a skill-based pain education class using LLMs. We utilized a dual-method analytical approach, with both LLM-assisted and supported manual thematic review.

RESULTS

The thematic analysis of qualitative data using ChatGPT yielded 7 major themes: (1) Use of Specific Audiofile; (2) Mindset; (3) Technique; (4) Community and Space; (5) Knowledge; (6) Tools and Approaches; and (7) Self-awareness.

CONCLUSION

Findings from the LLM-derived analysis provided rich and unexpected information, valuable to the program and the field of pain psychology by employing the set of patients' own words to guide program evaluation. Program directors may benefit from evaluating treatment outcomes on a broader scale such as this rather than focusing solely on improvements in disability. These insights would only be uncovered with open-ended data, and although potentially more insights could emerge with the help of a qualitative research team, ChatGPT offered an ergonomic solution.

摘要

引言

对参与者的定性反馈进行解读和利用,对项目评估具有巨大价值。仅依赖定量数据存在失去患者真实体验的风险,迫使他们的结果符合我们预先设定的目标。

目的

通过使用大语言模型(LLMs),项目负责人或许能够开始便捷地运用丰富的定性反馈。

方法

本研究提供了一个实例,展示了使用大语言模型评估患者(n = 82)对“赋能缓解”(一种基于技能的疼痛教育课程)的反应的可行性。我们采用了双方法分析途径,包括大语言模型辅助和支持的手动主题审查。

结果

使用ChatGPT对定性数据进行主题分析得出了7个主要主题:(1)特定音频文件的使用;(2)心态;(3)技巧;(4)社区与空间;(5)知识;(6)工具与方法;以及(7)自我意识。

结论

大语言模型衍生分析的结果提供了丰富且出人意料的信息,通过运用患者自己的话语来指导项目评估,对该项目和疼痛心理学领域具有重要价值。项目负责人可能会从如此更广泛的规模评估治疗结果中受益,而不是仅仅关注残疾状况的改善。这些见解只有通过开放式数据才能发现,尽管在定性研究团队的帮助下可能会出现更多见解,但ChatGPT提供了一个符合人体工程学的解决方案。

相似文献

1
A positive spin: large language models can help directors evaluate programs through their patients' own words.积极的一面:大语言模型可以帮助主任们通过患者自己的话语来评估项目。
Pain Rep. 2024 Dec 24;10(1):e1219. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001219. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Comparing the Efficacy and Efficiency of Human and Generative AI: Qualitative Thematic Analyses.比较人类与生成式人工智能的功效和效率:定性主题分析
JMIR AI. 2024 Aug 2;3:e54482. doi: 10.2196/54482.
3
A qualitative survey on perception of medical students on the use of large language models for educational purposes.关于医学生对将大语言模型用于教育目的的认知的定性调查。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2025 Mar 1;49(1):27-36. doi: 10.1152/advan.00088.2024. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
4
Large Language Models Can Enable Inductive Thematic Analysis of a Social Media Corpus in a Single Prompt: Human Validation Study.大语言模型可通过单一提示实现社交媒体语料库的归纳主题分析:人类验证研究。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2024 Aug 29;4:e59641. doi: 10.2196/59641.
5
Evidence-based potential of generative artificial intelligence large language models in orthodontics: a comparative study of ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing.生成式人工智能大语言模型在正畸学中的循证潜力:ChatGPT、谷歌巴德和微软必应的比较研究
Eur J Orthod. 2024 Apr 13. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjae017.
6
Quality of Answers of Generative Large Language Models Versus Peer Users for Interpreting Laboratory Test Results for Lay Patients: Evaluation Study.生成式大语言模型与同行用户对解释非专业患者实验室检测结果的答案质量比较:评估研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Apr 17;26:e56655. doi: 10.2196/56655.
7
Large Language Models in Worldwide Medical Exams: Platform Development and Comprehensive Analysis.全球医学考试中的大语言模型:平台开发与综合分析
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 27;26:e66114. doi: 10.2196/66114.
8
Large language models for conducting systematic reviews: on the rise, but not yet ready for use-a scoping review.用于进行系统评价的大型语言模型:正在兴起,但尚未准备好投入使用——一项范围综述
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 May;181:111746. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111746. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
9
Learning to Make Rare and Complex Diagnoses With Generative AI Assistance: Qualitative Study of Popular Large Language Models.利用生成式人工智能辅助学习罕见且复杂的诊断:对流行的大型语言模型的定性研究。
JMIR Med Educ. 2024 Feb 13;10:e51391. doi: 10.2196/51391.
10
Using Generative Artificial Intelligence in Health Economics and Outcomes Research: A Primer on Techniques and Breakthroughs.在卫生经济学与结果研究中使用生成式人工智能:技术与突破入门
Pharmacoecon Open. 2025 Apr 29. doi: 10.1007/s41669-025-00580-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and preliminary testing of a secure large language model-based chatbot for brief alcohol counseling in young adults.基于安全大语言模型的年轻人简短酒精咨询聊天机器人的开发与初步测试
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2025 Jul 1;272:112697. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2025.112697. Epub 2025 Apr 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Harnessing ChatGPT for Thematic Analysis: Are We Ready?利用 ChatGPT 进行主题分析:我们准备好了吗?
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 31;26:e54974. doi: 10.2196/54974.
2
Empowered Relief, cognitive behavioral therapy, and health education for people with chronic pain: a comparison of outcomes at 6-month Follow-up for a randomized controlled trial.慢性疼痛患者的强化缓解、认知行为疗法和健康教育:一项随机对照试验6个月随访结果的比较
Pain Rep. 2024 Jan 25;9(1):e1116. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001116. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
Advancing Data Science Among the Federal Public Health Workforce: The Data Science Upskilling Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.提升联邦公共卫生工作队伍的数据科学水平:疾病控制与预防中心的数据科学技能提升计划
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2024;30(2):E41-E46. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001865.
4
ChatGPT hallucinating: can it get any more humanlike?ChatGPT产生幻觉:它能变得更像人类吗?
Eur Heart J. 2024 Feb 1;45(5):321-323. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad766.
5
Artificial Hallucinations in ChatGPT: Implications in Scientific Writing.ChatGPT中的人工幻觉:对科学写作的影响
Cureus. 2023 Feb 19;15(2):e35179. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35179. eCollection 2023 Feb.
6
Patient Responses to the Term Pain Catastrophizing: Thematic Analysis of Cross-sectional International Data.患者对疼痛灾难化术语的反应:国际横断面数据的主题分析。
J Pain. 2023 Feb;24(2):356-367. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2022.10.001. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
7
Comparison of a Single-Session Pain Management Skills Intervention With a Single-Session Health Education Intervention and 8 Sessions of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.比较单次疼痛管理技能干预与单次健康教育培训干预以及 8 次认知行为疗法对慢性下腰痛成人的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2113401. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13401.
8
Beyond pain, distress, and disability: the importance of social outcomes in pain management research and practice.超越疼痛、痛苦和残疾:社会结果在疼痛管理研究与实践中的重要性。
Pain. 2022 Mar 1;163(3):e426-e431. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002404.
9
The role of social isolation in physical and emotional outcomes among patients with chronic pain.社会隔离在慢性疼痛患者身体和情绪结果中的作用。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2021 Mar-Apr;69:50-54. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2021.01.009. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
10
The effects of kinesiophobia on outcome following total knee replacement: a systematic review.运动恐惧症对全膝关节置换术后结局的影响:系统评价。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Dec;140(12):2057-2070. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03582-5. Epub 2020 Aug 24.