文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Using Generative Artificial Intelligence in Health Economics and Outcomes Research: A Primer on Techniques and Breakthroughs.

作者信息

Reason Tim, Klijn Sven, Rawlinson Will, Benbow Emma, Langham Julia, Teitsson Siguroli, Johannesen Kasper, Malcolm Bill

机构信息

Estima Scientific, 2 Eastbourne Terrace, London, W2 6LG, UK.

Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacoecon Open. 2025 Apr 29. doi: 10.1007/s41669-025-00580-4.


DOI:10.1007/s41669-025-00580-4
PMID:40301283
Abstract

The emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) offers the potential to enhance health economics and outcomes research (HEOR) by streamlining traditionally time-consuming and labour-intensive tasks, such as literature reviews, data extraction, and economic modelling. To effectively navigate this evolving landscape, health economists need a foundational understanding of how GenAI can complement their work. This primer aims to introduce health economists to the essentials of using GenAI tools, particularly large language models (LLMs), in HEOR projects. For health economists new to GenAI technologies, chatbot interfaces like ChatGPT offer an accessible way to explore the potential of LLMs. For more complex projects, knowledge of application programming interfaces (APIs), which provide scalability and integration capabilities, and prompt engineering strategies, such as few-shot and chain-of-thought prompting, is necessary to ensure accurate and efficient data analysis, enhance model performance, and tailor outputs to specific HEOR needs. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) can further improve LLM performance by incorporating current external information. LLMs have significant potential in many common HEOR tasks, such as summarising medical literature, extracting structured data, drafting report sections, generating statistical code, answering specific questions, and reviewing materials to enhance quality. However, health economists must also be aware of ongoing limitations and challenges, such as the propensity of LLMs to produce inaccurate information ('hallucinate'), security concerns, issues with reproducibility, and the risk of bias. Implementing LLMs in HEOR requires robust security protocols to handle sensitive data in compliance with the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the United States' Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). Deployment options such as local hosting, secure API use, or cloud-hosted open-source models offer varying levels of control and cost, each with unique trade-offs in security, accessibility, and technical demands. Reproducibility and transparency also pose unique challenges. To ensure the credibility of LLM-generated content, explicit declarations of the model version, prompting techniques, and benchmarks against established standards are recommended. Given the 'black box' nature of LLMs, a clear reporting structure is essential to maintain transparency and validate outputs, enabling stakeholders to assess the reliability and accuracy of LLM-generated HEOR analyses. The ethical implications of using artificial intelligence (AI) in HEOR, including LLMs, are complex and multifaceted, requiring careful assessment of each use case to determine the necessary level of ethical scrutiny and transparency. Health economists must balance the potential benefits of AI adoption against the risks of maintaining current practices, while also considering issues such as accountability, bias, intellectual property, and the broader impact on the healthcare system. As LLMs and AI technologies advance, their potential role in HEOR will become increasingly evident. Key areas of promise include creating dynamic, continuously updated HEOR materials, providing patients with more accessible information, and enhancing analytics for faster access to medicines. To maximise these benefits, health economists must understand and address challenges such as data ownership and bias. The coming years will be critical for establishing best practices for GenAI in HEOR. This primer encourages health economists to adopt GenAI responsibly, balancing innovation with scientific rigor and ethical integrity to improve healthcare insights and decision-making.

摘要

相似文献

[1]
Using Generative Artificial Intelligence in Health Economics and Outcomes Research: A Primer on Techniques and Breakthroughs.

Pharmacoecon Open. 2025-4-29

[2]
Integration of Generative AI with Human Expertise in HEOR: A Hybrid Intelligence Framework.

Adv Ther. 2025-6-25

[3]
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).

Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025-6-30

[4]
Applications of Large Language Models in the Field of Suicide Prevention: Scoping Review.

J Med Internet Res. 2025-1-23

[5]
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.

Health Technol Assess. 2006-9

[6]
Chatbot for the Return of Positive Genetic Screening Results for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Prompt Engineering Project.

JMIR Cancer. 2025-6-10

[7]
Evaluating and Enhancing Japanese Large Language Models for Genetic Counseling Support: Comparative Study of Domain Adaptation and the Development of an Expert-Evaluated Dataset.

JMIR Med Inform. 2025-1-16

[8]
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.

Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025-5-21

[9]
The health economics of insulin therapy: How do we address the rising demands, costs, inequalities and barriers to achieving optimal outcomes.

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025-7

[10]
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.

J Health Organ Manag. 2025-6-30

引用本文的文献

[1]
R WE ready for reimbursement? A round up of developments in real-world evidence relating to health technology assessment: part 20.

J Comp Eff Res. 2025-9

[2]
CIMUVET-survey: Complementary and Integrative Medicine (CIM) use in veterinary practice in Austria and CIM education at universities in Austria, Germany and Switzerland.

PLoS One. 2025-7-2

本文引用的文献

[1]
Continual learning across population cohorts with distribution shift: insights from multi-cohort metabolic syndrome identification.

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025-6-11

[2]
Detecting emergencies in patient portal messages using large language models and knowledge graph-based retrieval-augmented generation.

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025-6-1

[3]
Exploring the potential of LLM to enhance teaching plans through teaching simulation.

NPJ Sci Learn. 2025-2-6

[4]
Improving large language model applications in biomedicine with retrieval-augmented generation: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and clinical development guidelines.

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025-4-1

[5]
Generative Artificial Intelligence for Health Technology Assessment: Opportunities, Challenges, and Policy Considerations: An ISPOR Working Group Report.

Value Health. 2025-2

[6]
Advancing Clinical Practice: The Potential of Multimodal Technology in Modern Medicine.

J Clin Med. 2024-10-19

[7]
Benchmarking Large Language Models in Evidence-Based Medicine.

IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2024-10-21

[8]
Automated Mass Extraction of Over 680,000 PICOs from Clinical Study Abstracts Using Generative AI: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

Pharmaceut Med. 2024-9

[9]
Prompt Engineering Paradigms for Medical Applications: Scoping Review.

J Med Internet Res. 2024-9-10

[10]
Addressing AI Algorithmic Bias in Health Care.

JAMA. 2024-10-1

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索