Suppr超能文献

耳垂刺激能否作为经皮耳迷走神经刺激的假刺激?来自一项睡眠剥夺后警觉性研究的证据。

Can earlobe stimulation serve as a sham for transcutaneous auricular vagus stimulation? Evidence from an alertness study following sleep deprivation.

作者信息

Cheng Chen, Xue Xinxin, Jiao Yunyun, Du Mengyu, Zhang Mengkai, Zeng Xiao, Sun Jin-Bo, Qin Wei, Deng Hui, Yang Xue-Juan

机构信息

Engineering Research Center of Molecular and Neuro Imaging of the Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, China.

Intelligent Non-invasive Neuromodulation Technology and Transformation Joint Laboratory, Xidian University, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

Psychophysiology. 2025 Jan;62(1):e14744. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14744.

Abstract

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has garnered increasing attention as a safe and effective peripheral neuromodulation technique in various clinical and cognitive neuroscience fields. However, there is ongoing debate about whether the commonly used earlobe control interferes with the objective assessment of taVNS regulatory effects. This study aims to further explore the regulatory effects of taVNS and earlobe stimulation (ES) on alertness levels and physiological indicators following 24 h of sleep deprivation (SD), based on previous findings that both taVNS and ES showed significant positive effects. The goal is to evaluate whether ES can serve as a neutral sham condition. Using a within-subject randomized experimental design involving 56 participants, we assessed alertness, heart rate variability (HRV), and salivary alpha-amylase (sAA) levels in the morning of the first day. After 24 h of SD and 30 min of either taVNS or ES intervention, these indicators were re-evaluated, and the changes in both groups were analyzed. The results indicated that both taVNS and ES improved alertness levels following SD. However, taVNS significantly increased sAA levels, indicating activation of the LC-NE system, whereas ES significantly increased HR and reduced HRV, promoting sympathetic nervous activity. Additionally, the regulatory effect of taVNS on the alertness showed a higher correlation with SD impairment. Although taVNS and ES may involve different and separable neuromodulation mechanisms, both can enhance alertness following SD. Future studies should carefully consider the potential regulatory effects of ES when using it as a sham condition in taVNS research.

摘要

经皮耳迷走神经刺激(taVNS)作为一种安全有效的外周神经调节技术,在各种临床和认知神经科学领域已受到越来越多的关注。然而,关于常用的耳垂对照是否会干扰taVNS调节作用的客观评估,目前仍存在争议。本研究旨在基于之前的发现,即taVNS和耳垂刺激(ES)均显示出显著的积极效果,进一步探讨taVNS和ES对睡眠剥夺(SD)24小时后警觉水平和生理指标的调节作用。目的是评估ES是否可作为一种中性假刺激条件。我们采用了一项涉及56名参与者的被试内随机实验设计,在第一天上午评估了警觉性、心率变异性(HRV)和唾液α-淀粉酶(sAA)水平。在SD 24小时和taVNS或ES干预30分钟后,重新评估这些指标,并分析两组的变化情况。结果表明,taVNS和ES均可改善SD后的警觉水平。然而,taVNS显著提高了sAA水平,表明蓝斑-去甲肾上腺素能系统被激活,而ES显著提高了心率并降低了HRV,促进了交感神经活动。此外,taVNS对警觉性的调节作用与SD损伤的相关性更高。虽然taVNS和ES可能涉及不同且可分离的神经调节机制,但两者均可增强SD后的警觉性。未来的研究在将ES用作taVNS研究中的假刺激条件时,应仔细考虑其潜在的调节作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验