Kaduk Kristin, Petrella Alessandro, Müller Sophie J, Koenig Julian, Kroemer Nils B
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tübingen Center for Mental Health, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), partner site Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Psychophysiology. 2025 Feb;62(2):e70017. doi: 10.1111/psyp.70017.
The vagus nerve is crucial in regulating physiological functions, including the cardiovascular system. While heart rate (HR) and its variability (HRV) may provide non-invasive proxies of cardiac vagal activity, transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has yielded mixed effects, with limited research on right branch stimulation. In a randomized crossover study with 36 healthy participants, we investigated taVNS effects on HR and HRV indexed by SDRR, RMSSD, HF-HRV, and LF/HF ratio. To assess the impact of the stimulation side (left vs. right ear) on cardiovascular indices and interaction with the physiological state, we recorded electrocardiograms in four sessions per person, covering three session phases: baseline, during stimulation (taVNS vs. sham), and post-milkshake consumption with stimulation. First, we found moderate evidence against taVNS affecting HR (BF = 0.21). Second, taVNS decreased HRV (multivariate p = 0.004) independent of physiological state, with strong evidence for RMSSD (BF = 15.11) and HF-HRV (BF = 11.80). Third, taVNS-induced changes were comparable across sides and stronger than sham, indicating consistent cardiovascular effects independent of the stimulation side. We conclude that taVNS reduces HRV as indexed by RMSSD, HF-HRV, and SDRR without altering HR, contradicting the assumption that taVNS per se increases cardiovagal activity as indexed by increased HRV due to stimulating vagal afferents. Instead, our results support the role of vagal afferent activation in arousal. Crucially, taVNS on both sides can safely modulate the cardiovascular system without increasing the risk of bradycardia or causing adverse events in healthy participants, offering new treatment possibilities.
迷走神经在调节包括心血管系统在内的生理功能方面至关重要。虽然心率(HR)及其变异性(HRV)可能提供心脏迷走神经活动的非侵入性指标,但经皮耳迷走神经刺激(taVNS)产生的效果不一,对右支刺激的研究有限。在一项有36名健康参与者的随机交叉研究中,我们调查了taVNS对以标准偏差(SDRR)、相邻RR间期差值的均方根(RMSSD)、高频心率变异性(HF-HRV)和低频/高频比值(LF/HF)为指标的HR和HRV的影响。为了评估刺激侧(左耳与右耳)对心血管指标的影响以及与生理状态的相互作用,我们每人在四个时段记录心电图,涵盖三个时段阶段:基线期、刺激期间(taVNS与假刺激)以及饮用奶昔后刺激期间。首先,我们发现有适度证据反对taVNS影响HR(贝叶斯因子[BF]=0.21)。其次,taVNS降低了HRV(多变量p=0.004),且与生理状态无关,有强有力的证据支持RMSSD(BF=15.11)和HF-HRV(BF=11.80)。第三,taVNS引起的变化在两侧相当,且比假刺激更强,表明心血管效应一致,与刺激侧无关。我们得出结论,taVNS降低了以RMSSD、HF-HRV和SDRR为指标的HRV,但未改变HR,这与taVNS本身因刺激迷走神经传入纤维而增加HRV所指示的心脏迷走神经活动这一假设相矛盾。相反,我们的结果支持迷走神经传入激活在唤醒中的作用。至关重要的是,两侧的taVNS可以安全地调节心血管系统,而不会增加健康参与者心动过缓的风险或引起不良事件,提供了新的治疗可能性。