Suppr超能文献

自动调压下颌前移装置对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者自主神经系统的影响。

Effects of Auto-Titrating Mandibular Advancement Device on Autonomic Nervous System in Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

作者信息

Son Dae-Soon, Kim Jae-In, Kim Dong-Kyu

机构信息

Department of Data Science and Data Science Convergence Research Center, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Republic of Korea.

Department of Physiology, Neurology, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon 24252, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2024 Dec 13;14(12):1151. doi: 10.3390/jpm14121151.

Abstract

One prior study revealed that a newly developed auto-titrating mandibular advancement device (AMAD) could potentially enhance polysomnographic outcomes in individuals with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, evidence regarding its impact on autonomic nervous system dysregulation in OSA remains limited. In this study, we aimed to compare the effects of conventional mandibular advancement devices (MADs) and AMDA on autonomic function. : We retrospectively reviewed data from patients who visited a sleep center with complaints of snoring and sleep apnea (30 and 15 patients in the conventional MAD and AMAD groups, respectively). We assessed heart rate variability (HRV) frequency-domain metrics such as total power (TP), very low frequency (VLF), low frequency (LF), and high frequency (HF) using ultra-short-term and short-term modalities, assessing sympathetic and parasympathetic activity changes across treatment groups. : Conventional MAD treatment was associated with reductions in LF and LF/HF ratios, whereas AMAD treatment was linked to decreases in TP, VLF, LF, and LF/HF ratios. Notably, in patients with moderate OSA, LF values were significantly lower in the AMAD group than in the conventional MAD group. : These findings suggest that both devices could reduce sympathetic over-activity in patients with OSA, with AMAD demonstrating greater efficacy, particularly in those with moderate OSA.

摘要

一项先前的研究表明,一种新开发的自动滴定式下颌前移装置(AMAD)可能会改善阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者的多导睡眠图结果。然而,关于其对OSA患者自主神经系统失调影响的证据仍然有限。在本研究中,我们旨在比较传统下颌前移装置(MADs)和AMDA对自主功能的影响。我们回顾性分析了因打鼾和睡眠呼吸暂停就诊于睡眠中心的患者数据(传统MAD组和AMAD组分别为30例和15例患者)。我们使用超短期和短期模式评估心率变异性(HRV)频域指标,如总功率(TP)、极低频(VLF)、低频(LF)和高频(HF),评估各治疗组交感神经和副交感神经活动的变化。传统MAD治疗与LF及LF/HF比值降低有关,而AMAD治疗与TP、VLF、LF及LF/HF比值降低有关。值得注意的是,在中度OSA患者中,AMAD组的LF值显著低于传统MAD组。这些发现表明,两种装置均可降低OSA患者的交感神经活动过度,其中AMAD显示出更大的疗效,尤其是在中度OSA患者中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1131/11680007/89d561d3e853/jpm-14-01151-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验