Mizuno Takamasa, Yoshiko Akito, Yamashita Naoyuki, Harada Kenji, Takeuchi Kosuke, Matsuo Shingo, Nakamura Masatoshi
Research Center of Health, Physical Fitness and Sports, Nagoya University, Nagoya-shi 464-8601, Aichi, Japan.
Faculty of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Chukyo University, Toyota-shi 470-0348, Aichi, Japan.
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024 Dec 5;9(4):257. doi: 10.3390/jfmk9040257.
: the purpose of this study was to determine the contributions of mechanical, neural, morphological, and muscle quality factors on individual differences in the maximal ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM). : A sample of 41 university students performed passive-dorsiflexion and morphological measurements. In the passive-dorsiflexion measurement, while the ankle was passively dorsiflexed, maximal dorsiflexion ROM was measured in addition to passive torque at a given angle and muscle-tendon junction (MTJ) displacement during the last 13° as mechanical factors, and stretch tolerance and muscle activation were measured as neural factors. In morphological measurements, the cross-sectional area, muscle thickness, muscle fascicle length, and pennation angle were measured. In addition, the echo intensity was evaluated as muscle quality. Subjects were divided into three groups (flexible, moderate, and tight) using the value of the maximal dorsiflexion ROM. : Maximal dorsiflexion ROM and stretch tolerance were greater in the flexible group than those in the moderate and tight groups. MTJ displacement was smaller in the flexible group than those in the moderate and tight groups. Stepwise multiple regression analysis revealed that stretch tolerance and passive torque at a given angle were selected as parameters to explain the maximal dorsiflexion ROM (adjusted = 0.83). : these results indicate that individual differences in maximal ankle dorsiflexion ROM are primarily related to mechanical and neural factors.
本研究的目的是确定机械、神经、形态和肌肉质量因素对最大踝关节背屈活动范围(ROM)个体差异的影响。41名大学生参与了被动背屈和形态学测量。在被动背屈测量中,当踝关节被动背屈时,除了在给定角度下的被动扭矩以及在最后13°时的肌腱结合部(MTJ)位移作为机械因素进行测量外,还测量最大背屈ROM,同时测量拉伸耐受性和肌肉激活作为神经因素。在形态学测量中,测量横截面积、肌肉厚度、肌束长度和羽状角。此外,评估回声强度作为肌肉质量。根据最大背屈ROM的值将受试者分为三组(灵活组、中等组和紧张组)。灵活组的最大背屈ROM和拉伸耐受性高于中等组和紧张组。灵活组的MTJ位移小于中等组和紧张组。逐步多元回归分析显示,选定给定角度下的拉伸耐受性和被动扭矩作为解释最大背屈ROM的参数(调整后 = 0.83)。这些结果表明,最大踝关节背屈ROM的个体差异主要与机械和神经因素有关。