Sašek Matic, Leban Žiga, Kranjc Sara, Šarabon Nejc
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Primorska, 6310 Izola, Slovenia.
Andrej Marušič Institute, University of Primorska, 6000 Koper, Slovenia.
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024 Dec 8;9(4):263. doi: 10.3390/jfmk9040263.
Evaluations of the usability of hydraulic resistance for resisted sprint-training purposes remains rare. Thus, this study compared step-by-step changes in spatiotemporal characteristics during the first 10 m of sprints with varying hydraulic resistance loads. Fourteen male athletes performed 20 m sprints under minimal (10 N, considered as normal sprint), moderate (100 N), and heavy (150 N) hydraulic resistance loads. Split times at 10 m, contact time (CT), step length (SL), flight time, and step speed (SS) from the first to the sixth step were measured. A two-way repeated measures ANOVA (load × step) and a one-way ANOVA (load) with post hoc comparisons were used to assess the effects on spatiotemporal characteristics and split times, respectively. Under higher loads, the 10 m times were significantly longer (η = 0.79). The CT, SL, and SS varied significantly from step to step within all loads (η = 0.45, 0.41, and 0.54, respectively). The CT, SL, and SS of the first, fourth, fifth, and sixth steps of normal sprint differed significantly from most steps under moderate and heavy load (Cohen's = -3.09 to 5.39). In contrast, the smallest differences were observed between the second and third step of normal sprint and second to sixth steps under heavy load (Cohen's = -0.67 to 1.32, and -0.71 to 1.38, respectively). At the same load settings, a hydraulic resistance device induces changes in step characteristics comparable with those of other motorized devices and is therefore a viable option for resisted sprint training. If the goal of the training is to replicate the steps of the initial sprint acceleration phase, ~150 N of hydraulic resistance would be optimal.
针对抗阻短跑训练目的的水力阻力可用性评估仍然很少见。因此,本研究比较了在不同水力阻力负荷下短跑前10米时空特征的逐步变化。14名男性运动员在最小(10牛,视为正常短跑)、中等(100牛)和重(150牛)水力阻力负荷下进行20米短跑。测量了10米处的分段时间、接触时间(CT)、步长(SL)、腾空时间以及从第一步到第六步的步速(SS)。分别使用双向重复测量方差分析(负荷×步)和单因素方差分析(负荷)以及事后比较来评估对时空特征和分段时间的影响。在较高负荷下,10米用时显著更长(η = 0.79)。在所有负荷下,CT、SL和SS在各步之间均有显著变化(分别为η = 0.45、0.41和0.54)。正常短跑第一步、第四步、第五步和第六步的CT、SL和SS与中等和重负荷下的大多数步显著不同(科恩氏d值 = -3.09至5.39)。相比之下,正常短跑第二步和第三步与重负荷下第二步至第六步之间的差异最小(科恩氏d值分别为-0.67至1.32以及-0.71至1.38)。在相同负荷设置下,水力阻力装置引起的步特征变化与其他电动装置相当,因此是抗阻短跑训练的一个可行选择。如果训练目标是模拟初始短跑加速阶段的步幅,约150牛的水力阻力将是最佳选择。