Pires Carla
CBIOS-Universidade Lusófona Research Center for Biosciences and Health Technologies, Campo Grande, 376, 1749-024 Lisbon, Portugal.
Pharmacy (Basel). 2024 Nov 26;12(6):178. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy12060178.
Patient adherence to antibiotics is vital to ensure treatment efficiency.
To evaluate the impact of pharmacist communication-based interventions on patients' adherence to antibiotics.
A systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for systematic review (PRISMA) checklist and flow diagram. Controlled trials were included.
PubMed, Cochrane Library, SciELO, and Google Scholar. Quality, risk of bias, and confidence in cumulative evidence were evaluated.
Twenty-one trials were selected, with better patient adherence for the intervention than the control group. However, statistically significant differences were only found in two-thirds of these trials. The use of educational leaflets, personalized delivery of antibiotics, follow-up measures, and structured counseling were among the most impactful and significant interventions. The fact that community and/or hospital pharmacists were required to intervene in both groups (e.g., intervention vs. control/usual care) may explain that statistically significant differences were not achieved in all trials. Moderate quality issues and/or risk of bias were detected in some of the evaluated trials. The cumulative evidence was classified as high to moderate, which was considered acceptable.
It seems that more intense and structured pharmacist interventions can improve patient adherence to antibiotics.
患者对抗生素的依从性对于确保治疗效果至关重要。
评估基于药剂师沟通的干预措施对患者抗生素依从性的影响。
按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)清单和流程图进行系统评价。纳入对照试验。
PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、SciELO和谷歌学术。评估了质量、偏倚风险和对累积证据的置信度。
共选择了21项试验,干预组患者的依从性优于对照组。然而,只有三分之二的试验发现了统计学上的显著差异。使用教育传单、个性化发放抗生素、随访措施和结构化咨询是最有影响力和最显著的干预措施之一。两组(例如,干预组与对照组/常规护理组)均要求社区和/或医院药剂师进行干预,这可能解释了并非所有试验都取得了统计学上的显著差异。在一些评估的试验中发现了中度质量问题和/或偏倚风险。累积证据被分类为高到中度,这被认为是可以接受的。
似乎更强化和结构化的药剂师干预可以提高患者对抗生素的依从性。