Costa Júlio A, Coelho César André, Ferraz António, Brito João, Guilherme José, Seabra André, Travassos Bruno, Folgado Hugo, Gonçalves Bruno
Portugal Football School, Portuguese Football Federation, FPF, 1495-433 Oeiras, Portugal.
CIFD, Sports Research, and Training Center, Jean Piaget University of Angola, Luanda 2177, Angola.
Sports (Basel). 2024 Dec 16;12(12):346. doi: 10.3390/sports12120346.
This preliminary study examined the effects of playing walking football with and without a goalkeeper (GK) on physiological, physical, technical, and perceptual variables in older men. Twenty participants (67 ± 4.7 years) engaged in two five vs. five walking football sessions, one WITH-GK and one WITHOUT-GK, using a randomized crossover design. The heart rate (HR), distance covered, technical actions, perceived exercise intensity, and enjoyment were measured. The results showed a significantly higher average HR (131 bpm vs. 123 bpm, < 0.001), %HRmax (79% vs. 74%, < 0.001), and time in higher HR zones (>80%HRmax, < 0.05) in the WITH-GK condition. Participants also covered more total distance in the WITH-GK condition (1123 m vs. 1083 m, < 0.001), particularly at speeds above 4 km/h (834 m vs. 781 m, < 0.001). Conversely, more passes were made in the WITHOUT-GK condition (20 vs. 16 passes, < 0.001), while the WITH-GK condition showed more shots (two vs. one, < 0.001). The perceived exercise intensity was slightly higher in the WITHOUT-GK condition (five vs. four, = 0.01), although the enjoyment levels were similar, with a slight preference for WITHOUT-GK. Overall, playing WITHOUT-GK provides a safer, lower-intensity alternative to WITH-GK, reducing the physical and perceived strain while maintaining enjoyment. This makes WITHOUT-GK particularly suitable for older adults or individuals with health conditions, promoting participation and rehabilitation with minimized risks.
这项初步研究考察了在有守门员(GK)和没有守门员的情况下进行步行足球运动对老年男性生理、身体、技术和感知变量的影响。20名参与者(67±4.7岁)采用随机交叉设计,进行了两场五对五的步行足球比赛,一场有守门员,一场没有守门员。测量了心率(HR)、跑动距离、技术动作、主观运动强度和愉悦感。结果显示,在有守门员的情况下,平均心率显著更高(131次/分钟对123次/分钟,<0.001),心率最大值百分比(79%对74%,<0.001),以及处于较高心率区域的时间(>80%心率最大值,<0.05)。参与者在有守门员的情况下也跑了更远的总距离(1123米对1083米,<0.001),特别是在速度超过4公里/小时时(834米对781米,<0.001)。相反,在没有守门员的情况下传球更多(20次对16次,<0.001),而在有守门员的情况下射门更多(两次对一次,<0.001)。没有守门员的情况下主观运动强度略高(五分对四分,=0.01),尽管愉悦感水平相似,且对没有守门员的情况略有偏好。总体而言,没有守门员的比赛为有守门员的比赛提供了一种更安全、强度更低的选择,在保持愉悦感的同时减少了身体和主观压力。这使得没有守门员的比赛特别适合老年人或有健康问题的人,以最小的风险促进参与和康复。