Nagendra Lakshmi, Chandran Manju, Reginster Jean-Yves, Bhadada Sanjay Kumar, Bhattacharya Saptarshi, Dutta Deep, Hiligsmann Mickael
Department of Endocrinology, JSS Medical College, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysore, Karnataka, India.
Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Osteoporos Int. 2025 Feb;36(2):311-322. doi: 10.1007/s00198-024-07328-6. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
A cost-effectiveness analysis of FRAX® intervention thresholds (ITs) in Indian women over 50 years indicated that generic alendronate was cost-effective for age-dependent major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) ITs and hip fracture (HF) ITs starting at ages 60 and 65 years for full and real-world adherence, respectively. Alendronate was cost-effective at fixed MOF IT of 14% and HF IT of 3.5%, regardless of age.
Osteoporosis represents a significant public health challenge in India, with an increasing economic burden due to the aging population. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of using fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX®)-based intervention thresholds (ITs) for managing osteoporosis with generic alendronate in Indian women.
A Markov microsimulation model, adapted to the Indian healthcare context, was used to simulate the costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) associated with different treatment strategies. The one-time gross domestic product (GDP) per capita (estimated at INR 1,97,468/QALY gained) was used as the cost-effectiveness threshold.
The model revealed that generic alendronate is cost-effective for major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) ITs beginning at age 60 years with full adherence-incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of INR 102,151 per QALY gained, and age 65 with real-world adherence-ICER of INR 28,203 per QALY gained (conversion rate used is 1 US dollar (USD) = INR 83.97 and 1 EURO = INR 92.70). Hip fracture (HF) ITs showed similar cost-effectiveness at ages 60 (ICER of INR 67,144) and was the dominant strategy (i.e., more QALYs for lower costs) at ≥ 65 years. Fixed ITs of 14% for MOF and 3.5% for HF proved cost-effective across all age groups (dominant strategy for ages ≥ 65 years). Limitations of our study include the reliance on fracture incidence data from Singaporean Indians and variability in fracture prevalence across India.
The results support the integration of FRAX®-based fixed ITs from the age of 50 years and age-based ones from the age of 65 years in India to optimize resource allocation and improve osteoporosis management.
对印度50岁以上女性的FRAX®干预阈值(ITs)进行的成本效益分析表明,对于年龄依赖性的主要骨质疏松性骨折(MOF)ITs和髋部骨折(HF)ITs,普通阿仑膦酸盐分别在60岁和65岁开始时具有成本效益,对应完全依从和实际依从情况。无论年龄如何,在固定的MOF IT为14%和HF IT为3.5%时,阿仑膦酸盐具有成本效益。
骨质疏松症在印度是一项重大的公共卫生挑战,随着人口老龄化,经济负担日益加重。本研究评估了在印度女性中使用基于骨折风险评估工具(FRAX®)的干预阈值(ITs)联合普通阿仑膦酸盐治疗骨质疏松症的成本效益。
采用一个根据印度医疗保健情况进行调整的马尔可夫微观模拟模型,模拟不同治疗策略相关的成本和质量调整生命年(QALYs)。将人均一次性国内生产总值(GDP)(估计为每获得一个QALY 197,468印度卢比)用作成本效益阈值。
模型显示,对于主要骨质疏松性骨折(MOF)ITs,普通阿仑膦酸盐在60岁开始且完全依从时具有成本效益,每获得一个QALY的增量成本效益比(ICER)为102,151印度卢比;在65岁开始且实际依从时,每获得一个QALY的ICER为28,203印度卢比(使用的汇率为1美元=83.97印度卢比,1欧元=92.70印度卢比)。髋部骨折(HF)ITs在60岁时显示出类似的成本效益(ICER为67,144印度卢比),在65岁及以上时是主导策略(即成本更低,QALYs更多)。MOF固定IT为14%、HF固定IT为3.5%在所有年龄组均被证明具有成本效益(在65岁及以上年龄组为主导策略)。我们研究的局限性包括依赖新加坡印度人的骨折发病率数据以及印度各地骨折患病率的变异性。
结果支持在印度从50岁起整合基于FRAX®的固定ITs以及从65岁起整合基于年龄的ITs,以优化资源分配并改善骨质疏松症管理。