• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Stakeholder perceptions and experiences of competency-based training with entrustable professional activities (SPECTRE): protocol of a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research.利益相关者对基于胜任力的可托付专业活动培训的认知与体验(SPECTRE):一项定性研究的系统评价与主题综合方案
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 27;24(1):1538. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06508-6.
2
Evaluation of an undergraduate nursing entrustable professional activities framework: An exploratory qualitative research.本科护理可委托专业活动框架评估:探索性定性研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Apr;87:104343. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104343. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
3
Co-designing Entrustable Professional Activities in General Practitioner's training: a participatory research study.共同设计全科医生培训中的可委托专业活动:一项参与式研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 17;24(1):549. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05530-y.
4
Entrustable professional activities in health care education: a scoping review.医疗保健教育中的可委托专业活动:范围综述。
Med Educ. 2019 Aug;53(8):766-777. doi: 10.1111/medu.13879. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
5
Integrating entrustable professional activities using an integrated curriculum design framework in pharmacy education.在药学教育中,使用综合课程设计框架整合可托付专业活动。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2025 Feb;17(2):102269. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102269. Epub 2024 Dec 15.
6
International Delphi study on developing entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for master's learners in health professions education.国际德尔菲研究:为健康职业教育硕士学习者制定可委托的专业活动 (EPAs)。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 26;24(1):1362. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06377-z.
7
Integrating and Assessing Entrustable Professional Activities in Doctor of Pharmacy Curricula.整合与评估药学博士课程中的可托付专业活动
Am J Pharm Educ. 2025 Mar;89(3):101364. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101364. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
8
Entrustable professional activities in postgraduate general surgery training: a scoping review protocol.普通外科研究生培训中的可委托专业活动:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 15;13(3):e067322. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067322.
9
Introducing entrustable professional activities for postgraduate medical training in Switzerland.介绍瑞士研究生医学培训中的可委托专业活动。
GMS J Med Educ. 2024 Nov 15;41(5):Doc60. doi: 10.3205/zma001715. eCollection 2024.
10
Development of entrustable professional activities for advanced practice nurses education.高级实践护士教育的可委托专业活动的发展。
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Sep;116:105462. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105462. Epub 2022 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors associated with attainment of ad hoc entrustability among Taiwan otolaryngology resident physicians: a nationwide cross-sectional study.台湾耳鼻喉科住院医师临时可托付性达成的相关因素:一项全国性横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Aug 1;25(1):1135. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07679-6.

本文引用的文献

1
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
2
Assumptions About Competency-Based Medical Education and the State of the Underlying Evidence: A Critical Narrative Review.基于能力的医学教育的假设和潜在证据的状况:批判性叙事评论。
Acad Med. 2021 Feb 1;96(2):296-306. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003781.
3
Envisioning a True Continuum of Competency-Based Medical Education, Training, and Practice.展望真正的以能力为基础的医学教育、培训和实践的连续体。
Acad Med. 2019 Sep;94(9):1283-1288. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002687.
4
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings: introduction to the series.应用 GRADE-CERQual 对定性证据综合研究结果进行评估:简介系列。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 25;13(Suppl 1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0688-3.
5
Overarching challenges to the implementation of competency-based medical education.基于能力的医学教育实施面临的总体挑战。
Med Teach. 2017 Jun;39(6):588-593. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1315075.
6
Qualitative evidence synthesis to improve implementation of clinical guidelines.用于改善临床指南实施的定性证据综合分析
BMJ. 2017 Jan 16;356:j80. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j80.
7
The promise, perils, problems and progress of competency-based medical education.基于能力的医学教育的承诺、危险、问题和进展。
Med Educ. 2016 Jan;50(1):93-100. doi: 10.1111/medu.12839.
8
Using qualitative evidence in decision making for health and social interventions: an approach to assess confidence in findings from qualitative evidence syntheses (GRADE-CERQual).在卫生和社会干预决策中使用定性证据:一种评估定性证据综合结果可信度的方法(GRADE-CERQual)
PLoS Med. 2015 Oct 27;12(10):e1001895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001895. eCollection 2015 Oct.
9
Implementation of competency-based medical education: are we addressing the concerns and challenges?基于能力的医学教育的实施:我们是否在解决关注和挑战?
Med Educ. 2015 Nov;49(11):1086-102. doi: 10.1111/medu.12831.
10
Qualitative research synthesis: methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation.定性研究综合:利用元聚合的系统评价者的方法学指南。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):179-87. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062.

利益相关者对基于胜任力的可托付专业活动培训的认知与体验(SPECTRE):一项定性研究的系统评价与主题综合方案

Stakeholder perceptions and experiences of competency-based training with entrustable professional activities (SPECTRE): protocol of a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research.

作者信息

Phung Justin, Cowley Lindsay, Sikora Lindsey, Humphrey-Murto Susan, LaDonna Kori A, Touchie Claire, Khalife Roy

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 27;24(1):1538. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06508-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-024-06508-6
PMID:39731124
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11674456/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Competency-Based Medical Education (CBME) aims to align educational outcomes with the demands of modern healthcare. Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) serve as key tools for feedback and professional development within CBME. With the growing body of literature on EPAs, there is a need to synthesize existing research on stakeholders' experiences and perceptions to enhance understanding of the implementation and impact of EPAs. In this synthesis, we will address the following research questions: How are Entrustable Professional Activities experienced and perceived by stakeholders in various healthcare settings, and what specific challenges and successes do they encounter during their implementation?

METHODS

Using Thomas and Harden's thematic synthesis method, we will systematically review and integrate findings from qualitative and mixed-methods research on EPAs. The process includes a purposive literature search, assessment of evidence quality, data extraction, and synthesis to combine descriptive and analytical themes.

DISCUSSION

This study aims to provide insights into the use of EPAs for competency-based education, reflecting diverse contexts and viewpoints, and identifying literature gaps. The outcomes will guide curriculum and policy development, improve educational practices, and set future research directions, ultimately aligning CBME with clinical realities.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not required.

摘要

背景

基于胜任力的医学教育(CBME)旨在使教育成果与现代医疗保健的需求相一致。可托付专业活动(EPA)是CBME中反馈和专业发展的关键工具。随着关于EPA的文献不断增加,有必要综合现有的关于利益相关者经验和看法的研究,以加深对EPA实施和影响的理解。在本综述中,我们将解决以下研究问题:在各种医疗环境中,利益相关者如何体验和看待可托付专业活动,以及他们在实施过程中遇到哪些具体挑战和成功经验?

方法

使用托马斯和哈登的主题综合法,我们将系统地回顾和整合关于EPA的定性和混合方法研究的结果。该过程包括有目的的文献检索、证据质量评估、数据提取以及综合以合并描述性和分析性主题。

讨论

本研究旨在深入了解EPA在基于胜任力教育中的应用,反映不同背景和观点,并找出文献空白。研究结果将指导课程和政策制定,改进教育实践,并设定未来研究方向,最终使CBME与临床实际相结合。

试验注册

无需注册。