Liu Houyi, Ainiwaer Maierdanjiang, Hong Yingying, Sun Yang, Xiao Binghe, Ji Yinghong
Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, No. 83 Fenyang Road, Shanghai, 200031, China.
NHC Key Laboratory of Myopia (Fudan University), Key Laboratory of Myopia, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 Apr;263(4):1023-1033. doi: 10.1007/s00417-024-06722-4. Epub 2024 Dec 28.
To compare the precision of the arithmetic mean of surgically induced astigmatism (M-SIA) and the centroid of surgically induced astigmatism (C-SIA) in estimating SIA when predicting the power and axis of toric IOLs under different circumstances.
120 eyes of 99 patients undergoing toric IOL replacement in a simple cataract surgery were included in the retrospective study. The predicted position of toric IOL was calculated by Z Calc online calculator and Barrett Toric Calculator with M-SIA (0.4D) or C-SIA (0.1D). Position prediction error (PPE, the difference between the predicted position of toric IOL and the ideal position of toric IOL), its absolute value (PPE-Abs) and △PPE (the difference between absolute value of PPE calculated by C-SIA and by M-SIA using the same toric calculator) were used to evaluate the precision in estimate of SIA.
Statistical significance in mean PPE and mean PPE-Abs was found in the group M-Barrett. The orientation of corneal astigmatism and eye laterality were influential to mean PPE while gender was not. △PPE was below 0 in both toric calculators. Significant difference in △PPE was seen between groups with different corneal astigmatism when all eyes were OS, as well as between groups with different eye laterality when all eyes were with WTR astigmatism.
We did not find a significant difference between M-SIA and C-SIA in estimating the SIA of the patients undergoing small-incision cataract surgery combined with toric IOL implantation. M-SIA was not recommended in Barrett Toric Calculator. The orientation of corneal astigmatism and the incision on the cornea should be considered when choosing between M-SIA and C-SIA.
WHAT IS KNOWN? : Either the arithmetic mean of surgically induced astigmatism (M-SIA) or the centroid of surgically induced astigmatism (C-SIA) of a cohort was used to estimate the position of toric IOLs before the surgery. The size and site of corneal incision could influence the orientation and the magnitude of SIA. WHAT IS NEW? : When calculating the axis of toric IOLs with Barrett Toric Calculator, arithmetic mean of SIA (M-SIA) was not recommended for estimate. The orientation of corneal astigmatism could influence the estimate of SIA. We created several novel variables that could be used to indirectly evaluate the stability of toric IOLs and the prognosis of patients.
比较手术诱导散光的算术平均值(M-SIA)和手术诱导散光的质心(C-SIA)在不同情况下预测散光性人工晶状体(toric IOL)的度数和轴位时估计手术诱导散光(SIA)的精度。
本回顾性研究纳入了99例接受单纯白内障手术中行toric IOL置换术患者的120只眼。使用M-SIA(0.4D)或C-SIA(0.1D)通过Z Calc在线计算器和Barrett Toric计算器计算toric IOL的预测位置。使用位置预测误差(PPE,toric IOL的预测位置与toric IOL理想位置之间的差值)、其绝对值(PPE-Abs)和△PPE(使用相同toric计算器时C-SIA和M-SIA计算的PPE绝对值之间的差值)来评估SIA估计的精度。
在M-Barrett组中发现平均PPE和平均PPE-Abs有统计学意义。角膜散光的方向和眼别对平均PPE有影响,而性别无影响。两种toric计算器的△PPE均小于0。当所有眼睛均为左眼时,不同角膜散光组之间的△PPE有显著差异;当所有眼睛均为顺规散光时,不同眼别组之间的△PPE有显著差异。
我们发现在估计接受小切口白内障手术联合toric IOL植入患者的SIA时,M-SIA和C-SIA之间无显著差异。不建议在Barrett Toric计算器中使用M-SIA。在M-SIA和C-SIA之间进行选择时,应考虑角膜散光的方向和角膜切口。
已知什么?:在手术前,队列的手术诱导散光的算术平均值(M-SIA)或手术诱导散光的质心(C-SIA)均用于估计toric IOL的位置。角膜切口的大小和位置可影响SIA的方向和大小。新发现是什么?:使用Barrett Toric计算器计算toric IOL的轴位时,不建议使用SIA的算术平均值(M-SIA)进行估计。角膜散光的方向可影响SIA的估计。我们创建了几个新变量,可用于间接评估toric IOL的稳定性和患者的预后。