University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2019 Jul-Aug;8(4):275-279. doi: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000243.
The aim of this study was to compare the intraobserver repeatability and agreement of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements by 2 commonly available instruments, Zeiss IOL Master 700 (SS-OCT-based optical biometry device) and Tomey corneal specular microscope EM-3000 (Noncontact specular microscopy).
Retrospective study.
This is a retrospective analysis of data from routine clinical practice in which preoperative CCT measurements of 105 patients scheduled for cataract surgery were analyzed. Two consecutive CCT measurements were measured using Zeiss IOL Master 700 and Tomey corneal specular microscope EM-3000 by the same examiner. The repeatability of CCT measurements was analyzed by mean intraobserver difference, coefficient of repeatability (CR), and intraclass correlation. The agreement between the 2 methods was analyzed by mean difference and limits of agreement (LoA) using the Bland-Altman method.
The mean absolute intraobserver difference between the 2 measurements by Zeiss and Tomey were 3.41 ± 3.98 μm and 8.62 ± 9.52 μm (P < 0.0001), respectively. For Zeiss, the CR was 10.3 μm with 95% LoA of -10.5 to 10.1 μm. For Tomey, the CR was 25.2 μm with 95% LoA of -25.2 to 25.2 μm. The mean CCT measurements ± standard deviation by Zeiss and Tomey were 544.0 ± 38.1 μm and 532.6 ± 40.0 μm, respectively (P = 0.003). The 95% LoA in CCT between the 2 methods was -15.8 to 38.7 μm.
Zeiss IOL Master 700 has superior intraobserver repeatability and consistency than Tomey EM-3000. Zeiss produced higher CCT measurements than Tomey; hence, in clinical practice, interchangeability between these 2 methods is limited.
本研究旨在比较两种常用仪器(蔡司 IOL Master 700(基于 SS-OCT 的光学生物测量仪)和 Tomey 角膜共焦显微镜 EM-3000(非接触共焦显微镜))测量中央角膜厚度(CCT)的观察者内重复性和一致性。
回顾性研究。
这是一项回顾性分析,对计划接受白内障手术的 105 例患者的术前 CCT 测量数据进行了分析。由同一位检查者使用蔡司 IOL Master 700 和 Tomey 角膜共焦显微镜 EM-3000 连续测量两次 CCT。通过观察者内平均差异、可重复性系数(CR)和组内相关系数分析 CCT 测量的重复性。使用 Bland-Altman 方法通过平均差值和一致性界限(LoA)分析两种方法之间的一致性。
蔡司和 Tomey 两次测量的观察者内平均绝对差异分别为 3.41μm±3.98μm和 8.62μm±9.52μm(P<0.0001)。对于蔡司,CR 为 10.3μm,95% LoA 为-10.5μm 至 10.1μm。对于 Tomey,CR 为 25.2μm,95% LoA 为-25.2μm 至 25.2μm。蔡司和 Tomey 的平均 CCT 测量值±标准差分别为 544.0μm±38.1μm 和 532.6μm±40.0μm(P=0.003)。两种方法之间 CCT 的 95% LoA 为-15.8μm 至 38.7μm。
蔡司 IOL Master 700 具有比 Tomey EM-3000 更好的观察者内重复性和一致性。蔡司的 CCT 测量值高于 Tomey,因此在临床实践中,这两种方法的互换性有限。