Zhu Michael Z L, Scullion Jackson, Stroebel Andrie, He Cheng
Department Cardiothoracic Surgery, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, QLD, Australia.
School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia.
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2024 Dec 25;40(1). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivae221.
A best evidence topic was written according to a structured protocol described in ICVTS. The question addressed was 'In patients with vasoplegic syndrome following cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, does adjunctive methylene blue improve outcomes including reduced mortality, morbidity and vasopressor requirements?'
Ovid Medline was searched using a reported search algorithm. Articles that represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question were selected, tabulated and discussed.
Seven articles were selected: 4 randomized controlled trials and 3 observational studies. Studies were single centre with sample sizes ranging from 30 to 120 patients. Two studies reported a significant reduction in mortality among patients who received adjunctive methylene blue for post-cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) vasoplegic syndrome compared with placebo or standard therapy. Four studies reported improved haemodynamic stability and reduced vasopressor requirements following methylene blue. No studies reported methylene blue-related adverse events or worse outcomes compared to controls or standard therapy. There was significant heterogeneity among the included studies in terms of the timing and dosage of methylene blue therapy as well as the definition of vasoplegic syndrome.
The summation of the best available evidence, which was limited to small clinical trials and observational studies, suggests that the adjunctive administration of methylene blue for refractory post-CPB vasoplegic syndrome is safe and may provide benefits in terms of improved haemodynamic stability, reduction in vasopressor requirements and reduced mortality. Questions surrounding the optimal timing of methylene blue administration, as prophylactic, adjunctive, or rescue therapy for vasoplegic syndrome, require further investigation.
根据心胸血管外科学会(ICVTS)描述的结构化方案撰写了一个最佳证据主题。所探讨的问题是“在接受体外循环心脏手术的血管麻痹综合征患者中,辅助使用亚甲蓝是否能改善预后,包括降低死亡率、发病率和血管升压药需求?”
使用报告的搜索算法检索Ovid Medline。选择、列表并讨论了代表回答临床问题的最佳证据的文章。
选择了7篇文章:4项随机对照试验和3项观察性研究。研究均为单中心研究,样本量从30至120例患者不等。两项研究报告称,与安慰剂或标准治疗相比,接受亚甲蓝辅助治疗体外循环(CPB)后血管麻痹综合征的患者死亡率显著降低。四项研究报告称,使用亚甲蓝后血流动力学稳定性改善,血管升压药需求减少。与对照组或标准治疗相比,没有研究报告与亚甲蓝相关的不良事件或更差的预后。纳入研究在亚甲蓝治疗的时间和剂量以及血管麻痹综合征的定义方面存在显著异质性。
现有最佳证据(仅限于小型临床试验和观察性研究)的汇总表明,对于难治性CPB后血管麻痹综合征辅助使用亚甲蓝是安全的,并且在改善血流动力学稳定性、降低血管升压药需求和降低死亡率方面可能有益。围绕亚甲蓝作为血管麻痹综合征的预防性、辅助性或挽救性治疗的最佳给药时间的问题,需要进一步研究。