Suppr超能文献

甲烯蓝不能改善左心室辅助装置植入后的血管扩张。

Methylene Blue Does Not Improve Vasoplegia After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.

Department of Pharmacy, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Mar;111(3):800-808. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.05.172. Epub 2020 Aug 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vasoplegia is a frequent complication of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. We investigated the effectiveness of methylene blue (MB) for vasoplegia in LVAD recipients.

METHODS

Twenty-seven patients received MB for vasoplegia after LVAD implantation and met study criteria between March 2015 and May 2018. Propensity score inverse probability weighting identified 41 controls who did not receive MB for post-LVAD vasoplegia. Clinical outcomes were compared between control and MB groups and between patients who received doses during (n = 15) and after surgery (n = 12). Hemodynamics and vasopressor requirements were analyzed using analysis of covariance.

RESULTS

Median total MB dose was 1.9 mg/kg (interquartile range, 1.2-2.2 mg/kg). Methylene blue recipients experienced a transient initial decline in norepinephrine requirement from 141 ng/kg per min (95% confidence interval [CI], 81-201 ng/kg per min) to 117 ng/kg per min (95% CI, 58-176 ng/kg per min; P = .022) and a delayed decline in vasopressin from 4.8 U/h (95% CI, 3.8-5.8 U/h) to 4.0 U/h (95% CI, 2.8-5.1 U/h) (P = .004). In-hospital mortality, postoperative complications, and end-organ dysfunction did not differ from those of controls. There were no observed differences in mean arterial pressure, vasopressor requirements, or outcomes between patients who received doses during or after surgery. Weighted overall mortality in the entire study cohort was 8.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Although MB may affect vasopressor requirements, clinical outcomes in vasoplegia after LVAD implantation did not improve and were not affected by the timing of administration.

摘要

背景

血管麻痹是左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入后的常见并发症。我们研究了亚甲蓝(MB)治疗 LVAD 受体血管麻痹的疗效。

方法

2015 年 3 月至 2018 年 5 月,27 例 LVAD 植入后发生血管麻痹的患者接受 MB 治疗,并符合研究标准。采用倾向评分逆概率加权法识别 41 例未接受 MB 治疗 LVAD 后血管麻痹的对照患者。比较对照组和 MB 组以及术中(n=15)和术后(n=12)接受 MB 治疗患者的临床结局。采用协方差分析比较血流动力学和血管加压药需求。

结果

MB 总剂量中位数为 1.9 mg/kg(四分位间距,1.2-2.2 mg/kg)。MB 组患者去甲肾上腺素的需求最初短暂下降,从 141 ng/kg·min(95%置信区间[CI],81-201 ng/kg·min)降至 117 ng/kg·min(95%CI,58-176 ng/kg·min;P=0.022),血管加压素的下降也延迟,从 4.8 U/h(95%CI,3.8-5.8 U/h)降至 4.0 U/h(95%CI,2.8-5.1 U/h)(P=0.004)。院内死亡率、术后并发症和终末器官功能障碍与对照组无差异。术中或术后接受 MB 治疗的患者之间,平均动脉压、血管加压药需求或结局均无差异。整个研究队列的加权总死亡率为 8.8%。

结论

尽管 MB 可能影响血管加压药的需求,但 LVAD 植入后血管麻痹的临床结局并未改善,且给药时间并不影响其结局。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验