Suppr超能文献

由脉冲声和道路交通声的烦恼评级得出的脉冲噪声惩罚。

Penalty for impulse noise, derived from annoyance ratings for impulse and road-traffic sounds.

作者信息

Vos J, Smoorenburg G F

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 1985 Jan;77(1):193-201. doi: 10.1121/1.392257.

Abstract

In the laboratory, four groups of 16 subjects rated the annoyance caused by three types of impulse sounds (regular and irregular gunfire noise and metal-construction noise) and by road-traffic sounds, all presented in background noise. The subjects were presented with the sounds for 5-min periods. The annoyance ratings were related to the A-weighted equivalent level (Leq) of the sounds. From these annoyance ratings a correction term or penalty was derived, which, added to the Leq of the impulse sounds, gives the level of equally annoying traffic noise. The correction was determined for conditions in which (1) only the annoyance caused by specific sources, or (2) the annoyance caused by the total sound (specific source plus background) had to be rated. In addition, the indoor Leq of the constantly present background noise was 35 or 55 dB(A) by and large, the results showed that for lower levels of the sounds an impulse-noise correction of at least 10 dB was required, whereas for higher levels the derived correction was about equal to the ISO/R 1996 penalty of 5 dB. This conclusion, based on the relation between Leq and annoyance ratings, is consistent with the correction based on Leq and the percentage of subjects who reported to be "very much annoyed." For equivalent levels of the impulse sounds at which 33% of the subjects claimed to be very much annoyed, the correction was 10 dB for the conditions in which the indoor Leq of the background noise was 35 dB(A), and 5 dB when this Leq was 55 dB(A).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

在实验室中,四组每组16名受试者对三种脉冲声音(规则和不规则的枪声噪声以及金属建筑噪声)以及道路交通声音在背景噪声中所引起的烦恼程度进行了评分。这些声音向受试者呈现5分钟。烦恼评分与声音的A加权等效连续声级(Leq)相关。从这些烦恼评分中得出一个校正项或惩罚值,将其加到脉冲声音的Leq上,即可得到同样令人烦恼的交通噪声水平。针对以下两种情况确定了校正值:(1)仅对特定声源引起的烦恼进行评分,或(2)对总声音(特定声源加背景)引起的烦恼进行评分。此外,持续存在的背景噪声的室内Leq大体上为35或55 dB(A),结果表明,对于较低强度的声音,至少需要10 dB的脉冲噪声校正,而对于较高强度的声音,得出的校正值约等于ISO/R 1996规定的5 dB惩罚值。基于Leq与烦恼评分之间关系得出的这一结论,与基于Leq和报告“非常烦恼”的受试者百分比的校正结果一致。对于33%的受试者声称非常烦恼的等效脉冲声音水平,当背景噪声的室内Leq为35 dB(A)时,校正值为10 dB;当该Leq为55 dB(A)时,校正值为5 dB。(摘要截选至250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验