Allen Kerry, Shaw Karen L, Spry Jenna L, Dikomitis Lisa, Coyle David, Damery Sarah, Fotheringham James, Lambie Mark, Williams Iestyn P, Davies Simon
Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 27;14(12):e085754. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085754.
The proportion of people having home dialysis for kidney disease varies considerably by treating centre, socioeconomic deprivation levels in the area and to some extent ethnicity. This study aimed to gain in-depth insights into cultural and organisational factors contributing to this variation in uptake.
This is the first ethnographic study of kidney centre culture to focus on home dialysis uptake. The NASSS (non-adoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability) framework was used to map factors that influence the use of home dialysis.
We conducted focused ethnographic fieldwork in four kidney centres in England, with average or high rates of home dialysis use, selected to represent geographic, ethnic and socioeconomic diversity.
Observations of patient consultations, team meetings, patient education and training sessions (n=34); and interviews with staff, patients and carers (n=72).
We identified three themes that can support the decision to pursue home dialysis: (a) . Kidney care teams engaged with people's psychosocial needs and cultural contexts, and valued peer support as part of patient education; (b) . Transparency about all treatment options, minimisation of eligibility assumptions and awareness of inequities of access; (c) . This included organisational cultures which adopted quality improvement approaches and worked with wider stakeholders to shape future policy and practice.
Willingness to pursue dialysis at home relied on patients' and carers' ability to place their confidence in their kidney care teams rather than how services were organised. Our study of kidney centre culture has identified approaches to patient empowerment, access to treatment and readiness for improvement and change that could be incorporated into a service delivery intervention.
肾病患者接受家庭透析的比例因治疗中心、所在地区的社会经济贫困程度以及在一定程度上因种族不同而有很大差异。本研究旨在深入了解导致这种接受率差异的文化和组织因素。
这是第一项聚焦于家庭透析接受情况的肾脏中心文化人种志研究。采用NASSS(未采用、放弃、扩大规模、传播和可持续性)框架来梳理影响家庭透析使用的因素。
我们在英格兰的四个肾脏中心开展了重点人种志实地研究,这些中心家庭透析使用率处于平均水平或较高水平,其选择旨在代表地理、种族和社会经济多样性。
观察患者咨询、团队会议、患者教育和培训课程(n = 34);并访谈工作人员、患者和护理人员(n = 72)。
我们确定了三个可支持选择家庭透析的主题:(a)。肾脏护理团队关注人们的心理社会需求和文化背景,并重视同伴支持作为患者教育的一部分;(b)。所有治疗选择的透明度、尽量减少对资格的假设以及对获取不平等的认识;(c)。这包括采用质量改进方法并与更广泛的利益相关者合作以塑造未来政策和实践的组织文化。
在家接受透析的意愿取决于患者和护理人员对其肾脏护理团队的信任程度,而非服务的组织方式。我们对肾脏中心文化的研究确定了增强患者权能、获得治疗以及改进和变革准备情况的方法,这些方法可纳入服务提供干预措施中。