Davies Simon J, Bammens Bert, de Barbieri Ilaria, Brown Edwina A, van Cruchten Jan, Gallego Dani, Goffin Eric, Gallieni Maurizio, Gliki Sotiroula, Kooman Jeroen P, Meeus Gert, Moeslund-Hansen May-Britt, Rutherford Peter, Vanholder Raymond, Wilkie Martin, Van Biesen Wim
School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Belgium.
BMC Nephrol. 2025 Jun 3;26(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s12882-025-04188-y.
Use of Home Dialysis (referring to both peritoneal and home haemodialysis throughout this study), is under-exploited and highly variable across Europe, and this is the case both within as well as between countries. Several, predominantly modifiable barriers have been described that explain this inequity of access, but as yet no recommendations have been agreed upon as to how to address the problem.
A multi-disciplinary multi-organisational policy forum representing the key stakeholders was held at the EuroPD meeting in Bruges, November 2023 with the purpose of defining solutions and actions that the wider nephrology community should take to reduce disparities in access to home-based therapies. Three key themes were identified by a steering group prior to the forum: Dialysis Provider Motivation, Patient Empowerment and Training and Workforce Issues. Breakout discussion groups for each theme were asked to prioritise up to three actions per theme. These were further refined by the steering group and developed into proposed actions to be taken forward by the kidney failure community.
112 registrants attended the forum representing patients (5%), doctors, (57%) nurses, (13%) industry (7%) and various other roles (18%). The following actions were proposed: (1) a granular European audit of financial disincentives affecting decisions of policy makers, providers, patients and industry; (2) engaging national professional societies to challenge complacency towards uptake of home-based therapies; (3) stimulate networking to support small, inexperienced centres; (4) extending access to assisted peritoneal dialysis; (5) greater involvement of patients (locally and nationally) at every step, especially for advocacy; (6) empowering patients with transparent information; (7) mandating inclusion of training and exposure to Home Dialysis in national curricula; (8) promotion of career sub-specialists (doctors and nurses) with specific qualification in Home Dialysis; (9) promoting access to high quality training resources.
The kidney failure community can undertake a number of constructive actions to improve equity of access to Home Dialysis. The Policy Forum steering group who are representative of the key stakeholders have committed to taking this programme forward.
家庭透析(在本研究中是指腹膜透析和家庭血液透析)的使用在欧洲尚未得到充分利用且差异很大,在各个国家内部以及国家之间都是如此。已经描述了几个主要可改变的障碍,这些障碍解释了这种获取机会的不平等,但对于如何解决这个问题尚未达成一致建议。
2023年11月在布鲁日举行的欧洲腹膜透析会议上,召开了一个代表关键利益相关者的多学科、多组织政策论坛,目的是确定更广泛的肾脏病学界应采取哪些解决方案和行动,以减少家庭治疗获取方面的差距。在论坛之前,指导小组确定了三个关键主题:透析提供者的积极性、患者赋权以及培训和劳动力问题。要求每个主题的分组讨论小组为每个主题确定最多三项优先行动。指导小组对这些行动进行了进一步完善,并将其发展为肾衰竭群体应推进的拟议行动。
112名注册者参加了论坛,代表患者(5%)、医生(57%)、护士(13%)、行业(7%)和其他各种角色(18%)。提出了以下行动:(1)对影响政策制定者、提供者、患者和行业决策的财务抑制因素进行细致的欧洲审计;(2)促使国家专业协会挑战对采用家庭治疗的自满态度;(3)促进建立网络以支持小型、缺乏经验的中心;(4)扩大辅助腹膜透析的获取机会;(5)让患者在各个步骤(本地和全国层面)更多地参与,特别是在宣传方面;(6)为患者提供透明信息以增强其权能;(7)在国家课程中强制纳入家庭透析培训和接触;(8)推广具有家庭透析特定资质的职业亚专科医生(医生和护士);(9)促进获取高质量培训资源。
肾衰竭群体可以采取一些建设性行动来改善家庭透析的获取公平性。代表关键利益相关者的政策论坛指导小组已承诺推进该计划。