Suppr超能文献

家庭血液透析护理成功实施的障碍(BASIC-HHD):1. 研究设计、方法和基本原理。

Barriers to successful implementation of care in home haemodialysis (BASIC-HHD):1. Study design, methods and rationale.

作者信息

Jayanti Anuradha, Wearden Alison J, Morris Julie, Brenchley Paul, Abma Inger, Bayer Steffen, Barlow James, Mitra Sandip

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester M13 9WL, UK.

出版信息

BMC Nephrol. 2013 Sep 17;14:197. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-14-197.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ten years on from the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence' technology appraisal guideline on haemodialysis in 2002; the clinical community is yet to rise to the challenge of providing home haemodialysis (HHD) to 10-15% of the dialysis cohort. The renal registry report, suggests underutilization of a treatment type that has had a lot of research interest and several publications worldwide on its apparent benefit for both physical and mental health of patients. An understanding of the drivers to introducing and sustaining the modality, from organizational, economic, clinical and patient perspectives is fundamental to realizing the full benefits of the therapy with the potential to provide evidence base for effective care models. Through the BASIC-HHD study, we seek to understand the clinical, patient and carer related psychosocial, economic and organisational determinants of successful uptake and maintenance of home haemodialysis and thereby, engage all major stakeholders in the process.

DESIGN AND METHODS

We have adopted an integrated mixed methodology (convergent, parallel design) for this study. The study arms include a. patient; b. organization; c. carer and d. economic evaluation. The three patient study cohorts (n = 500) include pre-dialysis patients (200), hospital haemodialysis (200) and home haemodialysis patients (100) from geographically distinct NHS sites, across the country and with variable prevalence of home haemodialysis. The pre-dialysis patients will also be prospectively followed up for a period of 12 months from study entry to understand their journey to renal replacement therapy and subsequently, before and after studies will be carried out for a select few who do commence dialysis in the study period. The process will entail quantitative methods and ethnographic interviews of all groups in the study. Data collection will involve clinical and biomarkers, psychosocial quantitative assessments and neuropsychometric tests in patients. Organizational attitudes and dialysis unit practices will be studied together with perceptions of healthcare providers on provision of home HD. Economic evaluation of home and hospital haemodialysis practices will also be undertaken and we will apply scenario ("what … if") analysis using system dynamics modeling to investigate the impact of different policy choices and financial models on dialysis technology adoption, care pathways and costs. Less attention is often given to the patient's carers who provide informal support, often of a complex nature to patients afflicted by chronic ailments such as end stage kidney disease. Engaging the carers is fundamental to realizing the full benefits of a complex, home-based intervention and a qualitative study of the carers will be undertaken to elicit their fears, concerns and perception of home HD before and after patient's commencement of the treatment. The data sets will be analysed independently and the findings will be mixed at the stage of interpretation to form a coherent message that will be informing practice in the future.

DISCUSSION

The BASIC-HHD study is designed to assemble pivotal information on dialysis modality choice and uptake, investigating users, care-givers and care delivery processes and study their variation in a multi-layered analytical approach within a single health care system. The study results would define modality specific service and patient pathway redesign.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study has been reviewed and approved by the Greater Manchester West Health Research Authority National Research Ethics Service (NRES) The study is on the NIHR (CLRN) portfolio.

摘要

背景

自2002年英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所发布血液透析技术评估指南至今已有十年;临床界仍未应对好挑战,为10%至15%的透析人群提供家庭血液透析(HHD)。肾脏登记报告显示,这种治疗方式未得到充分利用,尽管它受到了大量研究关注,且在全球范围内有诸多关于其对患者身心健康明显益处的出版物。从组织、经济、临床和患者角度理解引入和维持这种治疗方式的驱动因素,对于充分实现该疗法的益处至关重要,这有可能为有效的护理模式提供证据基础。通过基础家庭血液透析(BASIC - HHD)研究,我们旨在了解成功采用和维持家庭血液透析的临床、患者及护理人员相关的心理社会、经济和组织决定因素,从而让所有主要利益相关者参与到这一过程中。

设计与方法

本研究采用了综合混合方法(收敛、平行设计)。研究分支包括:a. 患者;b. 组织;c. 护理人员;d. 经济评估。三个患者研究队列(n = 500)包括来自全国不同地理位置、家庭血液透析患病率各异的国民保健服务(NHS)站点的未透析患者(200例)、医院血液透析患者(200例)和家庭血液透析患者(100例)。未透析患者在研究开始后还将被前瞻性随访12个月,以了解他们接受肾脏替代治疗的过程,随后,对于在研究期间开始透析的少数患者将在研究前后进行相关研究。该过程将涉及对研究中所有群体的定量方法和人种志访谈。数据收集将包括患者的临床和生物标志物、心理社会定量评估以及神经心理测试。将研究组织态度和透析单元实践,以及医疗服务提供者对提供家庭血液透析的看法。还将对家庭和医院血液透析实践进行经济评估,并且我们将使用系统动力学模型进行情景(“如果……会怎样”)分析,以研究不同政策选择和财务模型对透析技术采用、护理路径和成本的影响。对于为诸如终末期肾病等慢性疾病患者提供非正式支持(通常性质复杂)的患者护理人员,关注往往较少。让护理人员参与对于充分实现复杂的家庭干预的益处至关重要,将对护理人员进行定性研究,以了解他们在患者开始治疗前后对家庭血液透析的恐惧、担忧和看法。数据集将独立分析,研究结果将在解释阶段进行整合,以形成一个连贯的信息,为未来的实践提供参考。

讨论

基础家庭血液透析(BASIC - HHD)研究旨在收集关于透析方式选择和采用的关键信息,调查使用者、护理人员和护理提供过程,并在单一医疗保健系统内采用多层分析方法研究它们的差异。研究结果将确定特定方式下的服务和患者路径重新设计。

研究注册

本研究已由大曼彻斯特西部卫生研究管理局国家研究伦理服务机构(NRES)审查并批准。该研究属于英国国家卫生研究院(NIHR)(CLRN)项目组合。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35ae/3851985/857375ff8906/1471-2369-14-197-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验