Mann D L, Maisel A S, Atwood J E, Engler R L, LeWinter M M
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985 Apr;5(4):882-90. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(85)80427-7.
To determine the incidence of cardioversion-induced ventricular arrhythmias in patients with therapeutic serum levels of digoxin, 19 patients (average age [+/- standard deviation] 61 +/- 12 years) undergoing elective direct current cardioversion for atrial fibrillation were studied. Only patients with therapeutic serum digoxin levels (range 0.5 to 1.9 ng/ml; mean 1.1 +/- 0.5) at the time of cardioversion were included. Patients with acute myocardial ischemia or unstable angina, serious electrolyte disturbance or those requiring class I antiarrhythmic agents for control of ventricular or supraventricular arrhythmias were excluded. Ambulatory electrocardiograms were recorded for 24 hours before and 6 hours after cardioversion. No patient developed malignant ventricular arrhythmias (ventricular triplets or tachycardia) in the immediate 3 hour period after cardioversion. Furthermore, there were no significant (p less than 0.05) differences in the frequency of ventricular premature beats or couplets before and after cardioversion. To determine whether the level of serum digoxin or the strength of the applied shock had a significant effect on the development of postcardioversion arrhythmias, the change in frequency of single premature ventricular beats after cardioversion was compared with the serum digoxin level (ng/ml) and the applied energy level (joules) by means of linear regression analysis. There was no significant (p less than 0.05) relation between these variables. These findings suggest that patients with therapeutic serum levels of digoxin may safely undergo cardioversion without the concomitant use of class I antiarrhythmic agents.
为了确定治疗性血清地高辛水平患者中电复律诱发室性心律失常的发生率,对19例(平均年龄[±标准差]61±12岁)因房颤接受择期直流电复律的患者进行了研究。仅纳入电复律时血清地高辛水平处于治疗范围(0.5至1.9 ng/ml;平均1.1±0.5)的患者。排除急性心肌缺血或不稳定型心绞痛患者、严重电解质紊乱患者或需要使用I类抗心律失常药物控制室性或室上性心律失常的患者。在电复律前24小时和电复律后6小时记录动态心电图。在电复律后的即刻3小时内,没有患者发生恶性室性心律失常(室性三联律或室性心动过速)。此外,电复律前后室性早搏或成对早搏的频率没有显著(p<0.05)差异。为了确定血清地高辛水平或施加的电击强度对电复律后心律失常的发生是否有显著影响,通过线性回归分析将电复律后单个室性早搏频率的变化与血清地高辛水平(ng/ml)和施加的能量水平(焦耳)进行比较。这些变量之间没有显著(p<0.05)关系。这些发现表明,血清地高辛水平处于治疗范围的患者在不联合使用I类抗心律失常药物的情况下可安全地进行电复律。