Holmes Emma J, Babchishin Kelly M
Department of Psychology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5B6, Canada.
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Dec 28. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-03050-w.
Among young adults, engaging in sexting (i.e., sharing sexually explicit materials of oneself with others) can be a healthy and normative sexual experience. However, there is risk associated with some types of sexting. The present study examined the rates and characteristics of high-risk sexting in a community sample of emerging adults (i.e., aged 18-30 years; N = 3,022). High-risk sexting was defined as participating in at least three of the following behaviors: showing one's face in a sext, sexting someone met online, sexting before the age of 16, sexting while intoxicated, or posting one's sext to a website. Over a quarter of participants had ever sent a high-risk sext (28%). Cisgender LGBPA+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, pansexual, asexual, and other non-straight sexual orientations; 38%, 462/1,220) and transgender (34%; 106/309) participants were significantly more likely to have sent a high-risk sext than heterosexual cisgender participants (18%; 271/1,493). When examining the strength of the relationship between impulsivity, susceptibility to peer pressure, perceptions of sexting, and sexual history with high-risk sexting, we found that the effect sizes overlapped across all three groups, meaning that the relationship between each of the correlates and high-risk sexting was not significantly different across the three groups. We suggest that peer pressure, perceptions of sexting, and impulsivity could be promising targets to inform effective sexual education content, regardless of sexual orientation or gender.
在年轻人中,进行性短信交流(即与他人分享自己的露骨色情材料)可以是一种健康且正常的性体验。然而,某些类型的性短信交流存在风险。本研究调查了一个新兴成年人社区样本(即年龄在18至30岁之间;N = 3022)中高风险性短信交流的发生率和特征。高风险性短信交流被定义为参与以下至少三种行为:在性短信中露脸、与网上认识的人进行性短信交流、16岁之前进行性短信交流、醉酒时进行性短信交流或在网站上发布自己的性短信。超过四分之一的参与者曾发送过高风险性短信(28%)。顺性别性少数群体(女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、泛性恋、无性恋及其他非异性恋性取向者;38%,462/1220)和跨性别者(34%;106/309)发送高风险性短信的可能性显著高于异性恋顺性别参与者(18%;271/1493)。在研究冲动性、易受同伴压力影响、对性短信交流的认知以及性史与高风险性短信交流之间关系的强度时,我们发现所有三组的效应量都有重叠,这意味着在这三组中,每个相关因素与高风险性短信交流之间的关系没有显著差异。我们建议,无论性取向或性别如何,同伴压力、对性短信交流的认知和冲动性都可能是为有效的性教育内容提供依据的有前景的目标。