Reese Thomas J, Padi-Adjirackor Nana Addo, Griffith Kevin N, Steitz Bryan, Patrick Stephen W, Leech Ashley A, Wiese Andrew D, Wright Adam, Shah Mauli V, Ancker Jessica S
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2025 Mar-Apr;65(2):102318. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2024.102318. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
Policy changes during the COVID-19 pandemic allowed buprenorphine to be prescribed for opioid use disorder via telemedicine without an in-person visit. A recently proposed change will limit buprenorphine access to 30 days without an in-person visit. Given that people living in rural areas may be disproportionally impacted by this change, we sought to better understand how buprenorphine adherence may be impacted by requiring in-person visits.
Compare buprenorphine adherence after telemedicine to adherence after in-person visits for patients who live in rural and urban areas.
In this retrospective cohort study, we used electronic health record data from a large medical center. The cohort included all adult patients prescribed buprenorphine for opioid use disorder during 2017-2022. The primary outcome was adherence, characterized by the Medication Possession Ratio (MPR) and gaps in buprenorphine treatment at 30 and 180 days. We conducted a longitudinal analysis at visit level, stratified by patient urbanicity, and controlled for patient, prescriber, prescription, and setting characteristics.
From 511 patients, we followed 3302 in-person and 519 telemedicine visits. Compared to in-person visits we observed no difference in the adherence following telemedicine visits overall. However, telemedicine was associated with higher MPR for rural patients (30 days: adjusted marginal effects [AME], 3.7%; 95% CI, 2.0-5.5; P < 0.001 and 180 days: AME, 8.5%; 95% CI 5.7-11.3; P < 0.001) and fewer gaps (30 days: AME, -6.7%; 95% CI, -9.9 to -0.1; P < 0.001 and 180 days: AME, -9.4%; -14.0 to -4.5; P < 0.001) compared to in-person visits.
These findings suggest that telemedicine is a viable alternative to in-person visits, especially for patients living in rural areas, which should help guide future policies that preserve or increase access to buprenorphine in a manner that can reduce barriers for patients.
新冠疫情期间的政策变化允许通过远程医疗开具丁丙诺啡用于阿片类物质使用障碍治疗,无需面诊。最近提议的一项变更将把无需面诊的丁丙诺啡获取期限限制在30天。鉴于农村地区居民可能受到这一变更的影响更大,我们试图更好地了解要求面诊会如何影响丁丙诺啡的依从性。
比较农村和城市地区患者远程医疗后与面诊后的丁丙诺啡依从性。
在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们使用了来自一家大型医疗中心的电子健康记录数据。该队列包括2017年至2022年期间所有因阿片类物质使用障碍而开具丁丙诺啡的成年患者。主要结局是依从性,以用药持有率(MPR)以及30天和180天时丁丙诺啡治疗的中断情况为特征。我们在就诊层面进行了纵向分析,按患者居住的城市程度分层,并对患者、开处方者、处方及环境特征进行了控制。
在511名患者中,我们跟踪了3302次面诊和519次远程医疗就诊。总体而言,与面诊相比,我们观察到远程医疗就诊后的依从性没有差异。然而,远程医疗与农村患者更高的MPR相关(30天:调整后的边际效应[AME],3.7%;95%可信区间,2.0 - 5.5;P < 0.001;180天:AME,8.5%;95%可信区间5.7 - 11.3;P < 0.001),且与面诊相比中断情况更少(30天:AME, - 6.7%;95%可信区间, - 9.9至 - 0.1;P < 0.001;180天:AME, - 9.4%; - 14.0至 - 4.5;P < 0.001)。
这些发现表明,远程医疗是面诊的一个可行替代方案,尤其是对于农村地区的患者,这应有助于指导未来以减少患者障碍的方式保留或增加丁丙诺啡可及性的政策。