From the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN (IAR, DM); Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN (CMA); Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN (TJR); and Department of Pharmaceutical Services, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN (GP).
J Addict Med. 2024;18(5):540-545. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000001320. Epub 2024 May 31.
The persistence of the opioid crisis and the proliferation of synthetic fentanyl have heightened the demand for the implementation of novel delivery mechanisms of pharmacotherapy for the treatment of opioid use disorder, including injectable extended-release buprenorphine (buprenorphine-ER). The purpose of this study was to understand provider-level barriers to prescribing buprenorphine in order to facilitate targeted strategies to improve implementation for patients who would benefit from this novel formulation.
Using an interview template adapted from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), we conducted structured focus group interviews with 20 providers in an outpatient addiction clinic across 4 sessions to assess providers' perceptions of buprenorphine-ER. Ninety-four unique comments were identified and deductively coded using standardized CFIR constructs.
Providers expressed mixed receptivity and confidence in using buprenorphine-ER. Although providers could identify a number of theoretical advantages to the injectable formulation over sublingual buprenorphine, many expressed reservations about using it due to inexperience, negative patient experiences, uncertainties about patient candidacy, cost, and logistical constraints.
Provider concerns about buprenorphine-ER may limit utilization. Some concerns may be mitigated through improved education, research, and logistical support. Given the putative benefits of buprenorphine-ER, future research should target barriers to implementation, in part based on hypotheses generated by these findings.
阿片类药物危机的持续存在和合成芬太尼的泛滥,加剧了人们对实施新型药物治疗药物滥用障碍(包括注射用长效丁丙诺啡(丁丙诺啡 ER))的需求。本研究旨在了解提供者在开具丁丙诺啡方面存在的障碍,以便为那些受益于这种新型制剂的患者制定有针对性的策略,以促进其实施。
我们使用从综合实施研究框架(CFIR)改编的访谈模板,在 4 个会议期间对一家门诊成瘾诊所的 20 名提供者进行了结构化焦点小组访谈,以评估提供者对丁丙诺啡 ER 的看法。确定了 94 条独特的意见,并使用标准化的 CFIR 结构进行了演绎编码。
提供者对使用丁丙诺啡 ER 的接受程度和信心不一。尽管提供者可以确定注射制剂相对于舌下丁丙诺啡的许多理论优势,但由于缺乏经验、患者体验不佳、对患者候选资格、成本和后勤限制存在不确定性,许多人对使用该制剂持保留态度。
提供者对丁丙诺啡 ER 的担忧可能会限制其使用。通过改善教育、研究和后勤支持,一些担忧可能会得到缓解。鉴于丁丙诺啡 ER 的潜在益处,未来的研究应针对实施的障碍,部分基于这些发现产生的假设。