• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不良事件发生后影响患者投诉行为性质的因素。

Factors influencing the nature of client complaint behaviour in the aftermath of adverse events.

作者信息

Gibson Julie, White Kate, Mossop Liz, Brennan Marnie L

机构信息

School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, UK.

Centre for Evidence-Based Veterinary Medicine, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, UK.

出版信息

Vet Rec. 2025 Mar 15;196(6):e4966. doi: 10.1002/vetr.4966. Epub 2024 Dec 29.

DOI:10.1002/vetr.4966
PMID:39734268
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11907750/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Negative veterinary client complaint behaviour poses wellbeing and reputational risks. Adverse events are one source of complaint. Identifying factors that influence adverse event-related complaint behaviour is key to mitigating detrimental consequences and harnessing information that can be used to improve service quality, patient safety and business sustainability.

METHODS

Interviews were conducted with five veterinary client complainants and five veterinary client mediators. Qualitative content analysis of the transcripts was used to identify categories of capability, opportunity and motivation influencing client behaviour. One category of motivation identified focused on the desired outcomes of complainants. Two hundred and eighty resolved veterinary‒client mediation cases related to adverse events subsequently underwent content analysis to quantify these desired outcomes.

RESULTS

Client complaint behaviour was motivated by clients' emotional reactions, perceptions and beliefs and desire to achieve an outcome as a result, and was influenced by previous complaint experience, technological ability, self-confidence and broader organisational and societal factors. Although financial redress was the most commonly identified desired outcome, apology, honesty, accountability and prevention of future events were valued.

LIMITATIONS

Small data sets and interpretative analyses limit the generalisability of the findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Proactively engaging clients in relation to adverse events is likely to reduce negative complaint behaviour and facilitate veterinary quality improvement.

摘要

背景

负面的兽医客户投诉行为会带来健康和声誉风险。不良事件是投诉的一个来源。识别影响与不良事件相关投诉行为的因素,对于减轻有害后果以及利用可用于提高服务质量、患者安全和业务可持续性的信息至关重要。

方法

对五名兽医客户投诉者和五名兽医客户调解人进行了访谈。对访谈记录进行定性内容分析,以确定影响客户行为的能力、机会和动机类别。确定的一类动机侧重于投诉者的期望结果。随后,对280起与不良事件相关的已解决兽医-客户调解案件进行了内容分析,以量化这些期望结果。

结果

客户的投诉行为受其情绪反应、认知和信念以及由此产生的实现某种结果的愿望所驱动,并受到以往投诉经历、技术能力、自信心以及更广泛的组织和社会因素的影响。尽管经济赔偿是最常被提及的期望结果,但道歉、诚实、问责和预防未来事件也受到重视。

局限性

小数据集和解释性分析限制了研究结果的普遍性。

结论

就不良事件积极与客户互动,可能会减少负面投诉行为,并促进兽医服务质量的提高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1e8/11907750/57200fdc221a/VETR-196-e4966-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1e8/11907750/3e15729e4ebd/VETR-196-e4966-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1e8/11907750/91dec1353311/VETR-196-e4966-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1e8/11907750/57200fdc221a/VETR-196-e4966-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1e8/11907750/3e15729e4ebd/VETR-196-e4966-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1e8/11907750/91dec1353311/VETR-196-e4966-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1e8/11907750/57200fdc221a/VETR-196-e4966-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors influencing the nature of client complaint behaviour in the aftermath of adverse events.不良事件发生后影响患者投诉行为性质的因素。
Vet Rec. 2025 Mar 15;196(6):e4966. doi: 10.1002/vetr.4966. Epub 2024 Dec 29.
2
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Consumer-providers of care for adult clients of statutory mental health services.法定心理健康服务成年客户的护理消费者提供者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD004807. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004807.pub2.
5
Smoking cessation medicines and e-cigarettes: a systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.戒烟药物和电子烟:系统评价、网络荟萃分析和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Oct;25(59):1-224. doi: 10.3310/hta25590.
6
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
7
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
8
Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.改善消费者安全有效用药的干预措施:系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):CD007768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007768.pub3.
9
What Factors Contribute to the Motivation of Adults Who Stutter to Continue Their Treatment? A Qualitative Study.哪些因素促使口吃成年人继续接受治疗?一项定性研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Sep-Oct;60(5):e70102. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70102.
10
Cultural competence education for health professionals.针对卫生专业人员的文化能力教育。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 5;2014(5):CD009405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009405.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Contextualised care in practice.实践中的情境化护理。
Vet Rec. 2024 May 18;194(10):396. doi: 10.1002/vetr.4294.
2
Dog breeds and conformations in the UK in 2019: VetCompass canine demography and some consequent welfare implications.2019 年英国的犬种和犬型: VetCompass 犬只群体结构及其对福利的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 26;18(7):e0288081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288081. eCollection 2023.
3
Are They Thinking Differently? The Perceptions and Differences in Medical Disputes between Veterinarians and Clients.他们的思维方式不同吗?兽医与客户对医疗纠纷的认知及差异
Vet Sci. 2023 May 22;10(5):367. doi: 10.3390/vetsci10050367.
4
The Complexity of the Human-Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human-Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding.人兽关系的复杂性:人兽关系中的同理心、依恋与拟人化以及动物囤积行为
Animals (Basel). 2022 Oct 19;12(20):2835. doi: 10.3390/ani12202835.
5
'We're gonna end up scared to do anything': A qualitative exploration of how client complaints are experienced by UK veterinary practitioners.“我们最终会因为害怕而什么都不敢做”:英国兽医从业者对客户投诉的定性探索。
Vet Rec. 2022 Aug;191(4):e1737. doi: 10.1002/vetr.1737. Epub 2022 Jun 5.
6
Adverse event reviews in healthcare: what matters to patients and their family? A qualitative study exploring the perspective of patients and family.医疗保健中的不良事件审查:患者及其家属关心什么?一项探索患者和家属观点的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 9;12(5):e060158. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060158.
7
Type and impact of clinical incidents identified by a voluntary reporting system covering 130 small animal practices in mainland Europe.在覆盖了欧洲大陆 130 家小动物诊所的自愿报告系统中识别出的临床事件的类型和影响。
Vet Rec. 2022 Jul;191(2):e1629. doi: 10.1002/vetr.1629. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
8
Uncovering the 'messy details' of veterinary communication: An analysis of communication problems in cases of alleged professional negligence.揭示兽医沟通中的“混乱细节”:涉嫌专业疏忽案件中的沟通问题分析。
Vet Rec. 2022 Feb;190(3):e1068. doi: 10.1002/vetr.1068. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
9
Ruminating on rudeness: Exploring veterinarians' experiences of client incivility.沉思无礼之举:探索兽医经历的客户粗野行为。
Vet Rec. 2022 Feb;190(4):e1078. doi: 10.1002/vetr.1078. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
10
'Gold standard care' is an unhelpful term.“金标准护理”是一个没有帮助的术语。
Vet Rec. 2021 Oct;189(8):331. doi: 10.1002/vetr.1113.