Suppr超能文献

轻度射血分数降低的心力衰竭中盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂与肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂/血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂的比较分析

Comparative analysis of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors/angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction.

作者信息

Lee Chia-Chen, Te-Wei Kuan David, Chang Kai-Chun, Chen Zheng-Wei, Cheng Jen-Fang, Lin Ting-Tse, Lin Lian-Yu, Wu Cho-Kai

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2024 Dec 13;15:1507326. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1507326. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To clarify the efficacy of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors/angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (RASI/ARNI) in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF).

METHODS

This study assessed the association between these medications and outcomes in HFmrEF using data from the National Taiwan University Hospital-integrated Medical Database. The primary outcome was cardiovascular mortality/heart failure hospitalization (HHF). Inverse probability of treatment weighting balanced baseline patient characteristics. The exposure of primary interest was use of MRA and use of RASI/ARNI, while the non-user group was also likely to receive other heart failure medication treatment.

RESULTS

Among 2,584 HFmrEF patients, 17% received MRA and 43% received RASI/ARNI. Predictors of MRA use included older age, slightly higher ejection fraction, and lower NT-proBNP level. RASI/ARNI use was predicted by higher BMI, lower NT-proBNP level, normal uric acid and potassium levels. MRA use was not associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular death [hazard ratio = 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78-1.02] or HHF (hazard ratio = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.94-1.09). Conversely, RASI//ARNI use was linked to a lower risk of cardiovascular death (hazard ratio = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.71-0.94) but not HHF (hazard ratio = 0.995, 95% CI: 0.924-1.07). Landmark analysis showed no significant difference in outcomes for follow-up durations exceeding 2 years.

CONCLUSION

MRA had a neutral effect on cardiovascular death and HHF, while RASI/ARNI was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular death. RASI/ARNI may be more beneficial than MRA for HFmrEF patients. Regular re-evaluation is essential to adjust heart failure treatment.

摘要

引言

为阐明盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA)和肾素 - 血管紧张素系统抑制剂/血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂(RASI/ARNI)在射血分数轻度降低的心力衰竭(HFmrEF)中的疗效。

方法

本研究利用台湾大学附属医院综合医疗数据库的数据评估了这些药物与HFmrEF患者预后之间的关联。主要结局是心血管死亡/心力衰竭住院(HHF)。治疗权重的逆概率平衡了基线患者特征。主要关注的暴露因素是MRA的使用和RASI/ARNI的使用,而非使用者组也可能接受其他心力衰竭药物治疗。

结果

在2584例HFmrEF患者中,17%接受了MRA治疗,43%接受了RASI/ARNI治疗。使用MRA的预测因素包括年龄较大、射血分数略高和NT - proBNP水平较低。使用RASI/ARNI的预测因素包括较高的体重指数、较低的NT - proBNP水平、尿酸和钾水平正常。使用MRA与心血管死亡风险降低无关[风险比 = 0.89,95%置信区间(CI):0.78 - 1.02]或HHF风险降低无关(风险比 = 1.01,95%CI:0.94 - 1.09)。相反,使用RASI//ARNI与心血管死亡风险降低相关(风险比 = 0.82,95%CI:0.71 - 0.94),但与HHF风险降低无关(风险比 = 0.995,95%CI:0.924 - 1.07)。地标性分析显示,随访时间超过2年时,结局无显著差异。

结论

MRA对心血管死亡和HHF有中性作用,而RASI/ARNI与心血管死亡风险降低相关。对于HFmrEF患者,RASI/ARNI可能比MRA更有益。定期重新评估对于调整心力衰竭治疗至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3859/11671259/0daf7337c105/fphar-15-1507326-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验