Suppr超能文献

热疗联合阿片类药物对胃肠道癌患者癌痛控制及手术应激的影响

Effect of hyperthermia combined with opioids on cancer pain control and surgical stress in patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

作者信息

Qian Jing, Wu Jing, Zhu Jing, Qiu Jie, Wu Chuan-Fu, Hu Cheng-Ru

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Suzhou Ninth People's Hospital, Suzhou 215200, Jiangsu Province, China.

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Suzhou Ninth People's Hospital, Suzhou 215200, Jiangsu Province, China.

出版信息

World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Dec 27;16(12):3745-3753. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i12.3745.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical palliative surgery is a common method for treating patients with middle and late stage gastrointestinal tumors. However, these patients generally experience high levels of cancer pain, which can in turn stimulate the body's stress and undermine the effect of external surgery. Although opioid drugs have a significantly positive effect on controlling cancer pain, they can induce adverse drug reactions and potential damage to the body 's immune function. Hyperthermia therapy produces a thermal effect that shrinks tumor tissues. However, its effect on relieving the pain of middle and late stage gastrointestinal tumors but also the stress of surgical palliative surgery remains unclear.

AIM

To investigate the effect of hyperthermia combined with opioids on controlling cancer pain in patients with middle and late stage gastrointestinal cancer and evaluate its impact on surgical palliative surgical stress.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study using the data of 70 patients with middle and late stage gastrointestinal tumors who underwent cancer pain treatment and surgical palliative surgery in the Ninth People 's Hospital of Suzhou, China from January 2021 to June 2024. Patients were grouped according to different cancer pain control regimens before surgical palliative surgery, with = 35 cases in each group, as follows: Patients who solely used opioid drugs to control cancer pain were included in Group S, while patients who received hyperthermia treatment combined with opioid drugs were included in Group L. In both groups, we compared the effectiveness of cancer pain control (pain score, burst pain score, 24-hour burst pain frequency, immune function, daily dosage of opioid drugs, and adverse reactions), surgical palliative indicators (surgery time, intraoperative bleeding, stress response), and postoperative recovery time, including first oral feeding time, postoperative hospital stay).

RESULTS

Analgesic treatment resulted in a significant decrease in the average pain score, burst pain score, and 24-hour burst pain frequency in both Groups L and S; however, these scores were statistically significantly lower in Group L than in Group S group ( < 0.001). Analgesic treatment also resulted in significant differences, namely serum CD4 (29.18 ± 5.64 26.05 ± 4.76, = 0.014), CD8 (26.28 ± 3.75 29.23 ± 3.89, = 0.002), CD4/CD8 (0.97 ± 0.12 0.83 ± 0.17, < 0.001), between Group L and Group S, respectively. The daily dosage of opioid drugs incidence of adverse reactions such as nausea, vomiting, constipation, and difficulty urinating were statistically significantly lower in Group L than those in group S ( < 0.05). Furthermore, palliative surgery time and intraoperative blood loss in Group L were slightly lower than those in Group S; however, the difference was not statistically significant ( > 0.05). On the first day after surgery, serum cortisol and C-reactive protein levels of patients in group L and group S were 161.43 ± 21.07 179.35 ± 27.86 ug/L ( = 0.003) and 10.51 ± 2.05 13.49 ± 2.17 mg/L ( < 0.001), respectively. Finally, the first oral feeding time and hospitalization time after surgery in group L were statistically significantly shorter than those in group S ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our findings showed that hyperthermia combined with opioids is effective in controlling cancer pain in patients with middle and late stage gastrointestinal tumors. Furthermore, this method can reduce the dosage of opioids used and minimize potential adverse drug reactions, reduce the patient's surgical palliative surgical stress response, and shorten the overall postoperative recovery time required.

摘要

背景

姑息性手术是治疗中晚期胃肠道肿瘤患者的常用方法。然而,这些患者通常经历高水平的癌痛,这反过来会刺激身体的应激反应并削弱外科手术的效果。虽然阿片类药物在控制癌痛方面有显著的积极作用,但它们会引发药物不良反应并可能损害身体的免疫功能。热疗产生的热效应可使肿瘤组织缩小。然而,其对缓解中晚期胃肠道肿瘤疼痛以及姑息性手术应激的效果仍不明确。

目的

探讨热疗联合阿片类药物对中晚期胃肠道癌患者癌痛控制的效果,并评估其对姑息性手术应激的影响。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,使用了2021年1月至2024年6月在中国苏州第九人民医院接受癌痛治疗和姑息性手术的70例中晚期胃肠道肿瘤患者的数据。患者根据姑息性手术前不同的癌痛控制方案进行分组,每组35例,如下:单纯使用阿片类药物控制癌痛的患者纳入S组,而接受热疗联合阿片类药物治疗的患者纳入L组。在两组中,我们比较了癌痛控制效果(疼痛评分、爆发痛评分、24小时爆发痛频率、免疫功能、阿片类药物每日剂量和不良反应)、姑息性手术指标(手术时间、术中出血、应激反应)以及术后恢复时间,包括首次经口进食时间、术后住院时间)。

结果

镇痛治疗使L组和S组的平均疼痛评分、爆发痛评分和24小时爆发痛频率均显著降低;然而,L组的这些评分在统计学上显著低于S组(P<0.001)。镇痛治疗还导致L组和S组之间在血清CD4(29.18±5.64对26.05±4.76,P = 0.014)、CD8(26.28±3.75对29.23±3.89,P = 0.002)、CD4/CD8(0.97±0.12对0.83±0.17,P<0.001)方面存在显著差异。L组阿片类药物的每日剂量以及恶心、呕吐、便秘和排尿困难等不良反应的发生率在统计学上显著低于S组(P<0.05)。此外,L组的姑息性手术时间和术中出血量略低于S组;然而,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后第一天,L组和S组患者的血清皮质醇和C反应蛋白水平分别为161.43±21.07对179.35±27.86μg/L(P = 0.003)和10.51±2.05对13.49±2.17mg/L(P<0.001)。最后,L组术后首次经口进食时间和住院时间在统计学上显著短于S组(P<0.05)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,热疗联合阿片类药物在控制中晚期胃肠道肿瘤患者的癌痛方面是有效的。此外,这种方法可以减少阿片类药物用量并将潜在药物不良反应降至最低,减轻患者的姑息性手术应激反应,并缩短术后总体恢复时间。

相似文献

5
[Effect of enterostomy on analgesic pattern in patients with advanced digestive tract cancer].[肠造口术对晚期消化道癌患者镇痛模式的影响]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Dec 25;22(12):1159-1164. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.12.011.

本文引用的文献

1
[Pharmacological pain management in cancer patients].[癌症患者的药物性疼痛管理]
Urologie. 2024 May;63(5):497-506. doi: 10.1007/s00120-024-02347-x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验