Bharti Nasrin, Ahmed Hashim, Hasan Shahnaz, Iqbal Amir, Uddin Shadab, Ahamed Waseem M, Ahmad Fuzail, Mujtaba Md Ali, Alghadir Ahmad H
Department of Physiotherapy, Buddha Paramedical College, Gida, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh 273209, India.
Department of Medical Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Najran University, Najran 1988, Saudi Arabia.
Pain Res Manag. 2024 Dec 19;2024:5873384. doi: 10.1155/prm/5873384. eCollection 2024.
The global rise in work-related musculoskeletal ailments has led to issues like neck discomfort, scapular muscle dysfunction, reduced neck mobility, and functional limitations. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of scapular functional exercises (SFE) and cervical isometric exercises (CIE) on pain, cervical range of motion (CROM), and functional limitations in individuals with chronic mechanical neck pain (CMNP). A two-arm, parallel group pretest-post-test randomized comparative trial was conducted. Thirty participants (21 females, 9 males; average age 28.94 ± 3.77 years) were randomly divided into two groups, 1 and 2 ( = 15/group). Both groups received common treatments of CIE and hot packs, while Group 1 was given SFE additionally. To assess the outcomes, which included pain, cervical range of motion (CROM), and functional limitations, measurements were taken using a numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), a standard universal goniometer, and a neck disability index (NDI) questionnaire at the beginning of the study and 4 weeks after the interventions. A one-way multivariate followed by univariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA and ANCOVA) was applied to examine the outcomes disparities within-group and between-group, with a significance level at 95% (i.e., < 0.05). MANCOVA analysis revealed a significant impact of interventions on CROM in all directions, NPRS, and NDI scores, even after adjusting for initial scores ( (8, 13) = 90.1; =0.001). Univariate ANCOVA showed significant improvements in outcomes for Group 1 compared to Group 2. Adding SFE to CIE and conventional physiotherapy was more effective than just using CIE and conventional physiotherapy alone. This approach better alleviated neck pain, improved CROM (particularly in forward and left-side flexion), and reduced functional limitations in individuals with CMNP. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05624021.
全球与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病的增加导致了颈部不适、肩胛肌功能障碍、颈部活动度降低和功能受限等问题。本研究旨在评估肩胛功能锻炼(SFE)和颈部等长锻炼(CIE)对慢性机械性颈部疼痛(CMNP)患者的疼痛、颈部活动范围(CROM)和功能受限的有效性。进行了一项双臂、平行组的预测试-后测试随机对照试验。30名参与者(21名女性,9名男性;平均年龄28.94±3.77岁)被随机分为两组,第1组和第2组(每组n = 15)。两组均接受CIE和热敷的常规治疗,而第1组额外接受SFE。为了评估包括疼痛、颈部活动范围(CROM)和功能受限在内的结果,在研究开始时和干预后4周使用数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS)、标准通用角度计和颈部残疾指数(NDI)问卷进行测量。应用单因素多变量分析,随后进行协方差单变量分析(MANCOVA和ANCOVA),以检验组内和组间的结果差异,显著性水平为95%(即p < 0.05)。MANCOVA分析显示,即使在调整初始分数后,干预对所有方向的CROM、NPRS和NDI分数仍有显著影响(F(8, 13) = 90.1;p = 0.001)。单变量ANCOVA显示,与第2组相比,第1组的结果有显著改善。在CIE和传统物理治疗中加入SFE比仅使用CIE和传统物理治疗更有效。这种方法能更好地缓解CMNP患者的颈部疼痛,改善CROM(特别是前屈和左侧屈),并减少功能受限。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT05624021。