de Lima Italo B G, Cruz Priscila J R, Borges Lucas P C, Gionbelli Mateus P, Ladeira Marcio M, Shike Daniel W, Casagrande Daniel R, Bernardes Thiago F
Department of Animal Science, University of Lavras, Lavras, 37200-900, Brazil.
Animal Sciences Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
Transl Anim Sci. 2024 Dec 9;8:txae173. doi: 10.1093/tas/txae173. eCollection 2024.
The snaplage residue presents itself as a potential alternative roughage source in finishing systems, owing to its high fiber concentration which aids in maintaining rumen health. Nevertheless, the performance of animals will hinge on both the allowance and the nutritive value it offers. This study aimed to evaluate different stocking rates of heifers grazing snaplage residue as an exclusive source of fiber on finishing phase performance. The treatments included two stocking rates (SR): i) low stocking rate (LS; 3.5 AU/ha) and ii) high stocking rate (HS; 7.0 AU/ha), which were obtained by modifying the size of the paddocks. Crossbred beef heifers ( = 48; initial body weight = 276 ± 23 kg) were assigned to 16 paddocks (3 heifers/paddock). The concentrate (87% of corn, 3.5% of soybean meal, 3.9% of cottonseed meal, 1.2% of urea, and 4% of mineral; DM basis) was fed ad libitum daily at 0600 hours. Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS. There was no SR × time effect ( = 0.88) on residue mass. There was less ( < 0.01) total residue mass for HS than LS, and total mass decreased ( < 0.01) over time. There was no SR × time effect ( ≥ 0.16) for behavior characteristics. There was no difference between HS and LS for average residue intake ( = 0.34; 0.44 vs 0.48 kg/d, respectively), concentrate intake ( = 0.84; 7.72 vs 7.78 kg/d, respectively), and daily gain (ADG; = 0.94; 0.95 vs 0.95 kg/d, respectively), The HS treatment increased ( < 0.01) gain per area (618 vs 309 kg/ha) compared to LS. No differences between SR were observed for carcass characteristics ( ≥ 0.12 The meat's chemical composition was not different ( ≥ 0.37) between treatments. Overall, the snaplage residue stocking rate did not affect the finishing phase performance of beef heifers, but the greater stocking rate (7.0 AU/ha) increased gain per land area.
青贮残渣因其高纤维含量有助于维持瘤胃健康,而成为育肥系统中一种潜在的替代粗饲料来源。然而,动物的生产性能将取决于其采食量和所提供的营养价值。本研究旨在评估不同载畜率的小母牛以青贮残渣作为育肥阶段唯一纤维来源时的生产性能。处理方式包括两种载畜率(SR):i)低载畜率(LS;3.5个动物单位/公顷)和ii)高载畜率(HS;7.0个动物单位/公顷),这是通过改变围场大小获得的。杂交肉牛小母牛(n = 48;初始体重 = 276 ± 23千克)被分配到16个围场(每个围场3头小母牛)。每天06:00自由采食精饲料(玉米占87%、豆粕占3.5%、棉籽粕占3.9%、尿素占1.2%、矿物质占4%;干物质基础)。数据采用SAS的MIXED程序进行分析。在残渣量方面不存在载畜率×时间效应(P = 0.88)。高载畜率的总残渣量低于低载畜率(P < 0.01),且总残渣量随时间减少(P < 0.01)。在行为特征方面不存在载畜率×时间效应(P ≥ 0.16)。高载畜率和低载畜率在平均残渣采食量(P = 0.34;分别为0.44千克/天和0.48千克/天)、精饲料采食量(P = 0.84;分别为7.72千克/天和7.78千克/天)以及日增重(ADG;P = 0.94;分别为0.95千克/天和0.95千克/天)上没有差异。与低载畜率相比,高载畜率处理提高了单位面积增重(分别为618千克/公顷和309千克/公顷,P < 0.01)。在胴体特征方面未观察到载畜率之间的差异(P ≥ 0.12)。各处理之间肉的化学成分没有差异(P ≥ 0.37)。总体而言,青贮残渣载畜率不影响肉牛小母牛育肥阶段的生产性能,但较高的载畜率(7.0个动物单位/公顷)提高了单位土地面积的增重。