• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高强度聚焦超声消融治疗局限性前列腺癌患者时全腺消融与部分腺消融的比较

Whole gland versus partial gland ablation in patients with localized prostate cancer treated by high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation.

作者信息

Lee Hae Sung, Song Sang Hun, Lee Hakmin, Hong Sung Kyu

机构信息

Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Prostate Int. 2024 Dec;12(4):213-218. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2024.09.001. Epub 2024 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.prnil.2024.09.001
PMID:39735197
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11681343/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Focal therapy is considered one of the treatment options for localized prostate cancer (PCa), particularly for low or very-low-risk patients. In this study, we compared the mid-term oncological outcomes in localized PCa patients treated with high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 237 patients who underwent HIFU for localized PCa. Patients were divided into two groups based on ablation type: whole gland ablation (WGA) and partial gland ablation (PGA). Follow-up biopsies were performed after one year postoperatively, and the oncological outcomes were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Among the total of 237 patients, 54 subjects were treated by WGA and 183 subjects by PGA. After one year postoperatively, follow-up biopsies were conducted on 199 patients, revealing residual cancer in 21.4% of WGA group and 15.3% of PGA group. Additionally, clinically significant (CS) cancer was observed in 14.3% of WGA group and 8.3% of PGA group. Survival analyses revealed significantly longer failure-free ( < 0.001) and salvage-free survival ( < 0.001) in WGA group than in PGA group. Similarly, in the intermediate-high risk group, WGA group exhibited longer failure-free ( = 0.005) and salvage-free survival ( < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

HIFU was performed with acceptable oncological outcomes in localized PCa. Despite higher proportion of high-risk patients in WGA group, WGA was associated with significantly better failure-free survival and salvage-free survival. Further prospective and multi-center studies are warranted.

摘要

背景

聚焦治疗被认为是局限性前列腺癌(PCa)的治疗选择之一,尤其是对于低风险或极低风险患者。在本研究中,我们比较了接受高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)治疗的局限性PCa患者的中期肿瘤学结局。

方法

我们回顾性分析了237例接受HIFU治疗局限性PCa的患者。根据消融类型将患者分为两组:全腺消融(WGA)和部分腺消融(PGA)。术后一年进行随访活检,并比较两组的肿瘤学结局。

结果

在总共237例患者中,54例接受了WGA治疗,183例接受了PGA治疗。术后一年,对199例患者进行了随访活检,WGA组21.4%的患者和PGA组15.3%的患者发现有残留癌。此外,WGA组14.3%的患者和PGA组8.3%的患者观察到具有临床意义(CS)的癌症。生存分析显示,WGA组的无失败生存期(<0.001)和无挽救生存期(<0.001)显著长于PGA组。同样,在中高风险组中,WGA组的无失败生存期(=0.005)和无挽救生存期(<0.001)更长。

结论

HIFU治疗局限性PCa的肿瘤学结局可接受。尽管WGA组中高风险患者比例较高,但WGA与显著更好的无失败生存期和无挽救生存期相关。有必要进行进一步的前瞻性多中心研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5da/11681343/b33c23bc89c3/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5da/11681343/75ceb6d0ccdd/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5da/11681343/01be81d78243/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5da/11681343/81b890ee70f9/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5da/11681343/b33c23bc89c3/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5da/11681343/75ceb6d0ccdd/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5da/11681343/01be81d78243/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5da/11681343/81b890ee70f9/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5da/11681343/b33c23bc89c3/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Whole gland versus partial gland ablation in patients with localized prostate cancer treated by high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation.高强度聚焦超声消融治疗局限性前列腺癌患者时全腺消融与部分腺消融的比较
Prostate Int. 2024 Dec;12(4):213-218. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2024.09.001. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
2
High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation for Prostate Cancer: Whole Versus Partial Gland Ablation.高强度聚焦超声消融治疗前列腺癌:全腺体与部分腺体消融。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2022 Feb;20(1):e39-e44. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.09.003. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
3
Oncological Long-term Outcome After Whole-gland High-intensity Focused Ultrasound for Prostate Cancer-21-yr Follow-up.全腺体高强度聚焦超声治疗前列腺癌的肿瘤学长期疗效-21 年随访。
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Jan;8(1):134-140. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.12.016. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
4
Role of Systematic Control Biopsies following Partial Gland Ablation with High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.部分前列腺腺体切除术后高强度聚焦超声治疗临床显著前列腺癌的系统性控制活检的作用。
J Urol. 2021 Nov;206(5):1177-1183. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001934. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
5
Salvage partial gland ablation for recurrent prostate cancer following primary partial gland ablation: Functional and oncological outcomes.原发部分前列腺切除术后复发前列腺癌的挽救性部分前列腺腺叶切除术:功能和肿瘤学结果。
Urol Oncol. 2022 Jul;40(7):343.e1-343.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.03.019. Epub 2022 May 9.
6
Whole-gland ablation of localized prostate cancer with high-intensity focused ultrasound: oncologic outcomes and morbidity in 1002 patients.高强度聚焦超声治疗局限性前列腺癌的全腺体消融:1002 例患者的肿瘤学结局和发病率。
Eur Urol. 2014 May;65(5):907-14. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.04.039. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
7
Partial gland ablation using high-intensity focused ultrasound versus robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a propensity score-matched study.高强度聚焦超声部分腺体消融术与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的比较:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Prostate Int. 2023 Sep;11(3):134-138. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2022.12.001. Epub 2022 Dec 17.
8
Non-Whole-Gland High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound vs Whole-Gland High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Management of Localized Prostate Cancer: 1-Year Oncological and Functional Outcomes.非全腺体高强度聚焦超声与全腺体高强度聚焦超声治疗局限性前列腺癌:1 年肿瘤学和功能结局。
J Endourol. 2019 Feb;33(2):100-106. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0468.
9
Primary Whole-gland Ablation for the Treatment of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: A Focal Therapy Society Best Practice Statement.原发性全腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌:焦点治疗学会最佳实践声明。
Eur Urol. 2023 Dec;84(6):547-560. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.06.013. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
10
Outcomes of partial gland ablation using high intensity focused ultrasound for prostate cancer.高强度聚焦超声前列腺癌部分腺体消融治疗的疗效。
Urol Oncol. 2022 May;40(5):193.e1-193.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.02.007. Epub 2022 Apr 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer statistics, 2023.癌症统计数据,2023 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Jan;73(1):17-48. doi: 10.3322/caac.21763.
2
Impact of Focal Versus Whole Gland Ablation for Prostate Cancer on Sexual Function and Urinary Continence.前列腺癌局部与全腺体消融治疗对性功能和尿控的影响。
J Urol. 2021 Jan;205(1):129-136. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001327. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
3
Active Surveillance of Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer: Long-term Outcomes from a Large Prospective Cohort.1 级前列腺癌的主动监测:来自大型前瞻性队列的长期结果。
Eur Urol. 2020 Jun;77(6):675-682. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.12.017. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
4
Non-Whole-Gland High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound vs Whole-Gland High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Management of Localized Prostate Cancer: 1-Year Oncological and Functional Outcomes.非全腺体高强度聚焦超声与全腺体高强度聚焦超声治疗局限性前列腺癌:1 年肿瘤学和功能结局。
J Endourol. 2019 Feb;33(2):100-106. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0468.
5
Results of Prostate Cancer Screening in a Unique Cohort at 19yr of Follow-up.19 年随访中独特队列的前列腺癌筛查结果。
Eur Urol. 2019 Mar;75(3):374-377. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.053. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
6
Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers in 2018.欧洲癌症发病率和死亡率模式:2018 年 40 个国家和 25 种主要癌症的估计值。
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Nov;103:356-387. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
7
Focal Therapy in Primary Localised Prostate Cancer: The European Association of Urology Position in 2018.原发性局限性前列腺癌的焦点治疗:2018 年欧洲泌尿外科学会立场。
Eur Urol. 2018 Jul;74(1):84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.01.001. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
8
Prospective Multicenter Phase II Study on Focal Therapy (Hemiablation) of the Prostate with High Intensity Focused Ultrasound.高强度聚焦超声前列腺局灶性治疗(部分消融)的前瞻性多中心 II 期研究。
J Urol. 2018 Apr;199(4):983-989. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.10.033. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
9
Comparisons of oncological and functional outcomes among radical retropubic prostatectomy, high dose rate brachytherapy, cryoablation and high-intensity focused ultrasound for localized prostate cancer.根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术、高剂量率近距离放射治疗、冷冻消融术和高强度聚焦超声治疗局限性前列腺癌的肿瘤学和功能结果比较。
Springerplus. 2016 Nov 3;5(1):1905. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3584-4. eCollection 2016.
10
New and Established Technology in Focal Ablation of the Prostate: A Systematic Review.新方法和成熟技术在前列腺局灶性消融治疗中的应用:系统综述。
Eur Urol. 2017 Jan;71(1):17-34. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.044. Epub 2016 Aug 29.